I really believe that this would have been the ideal thing to do. There will probably be a compromise of some sorts in the next two books, but to cripple the Seanchan would have made sense and been my action if I was Rand.
Very true. Rand originally intended to destroy the palace and the ships with balefire, then rain fire on the whole city causing panic and mass death. He chose not to go through with his attack, because the people in Ebou Dar showed him compassion when he got sick. He was unable to hurt them.
My question would be, why the heck was he planning on attacking the city itself in the first place? How does that make any sense? I mean all he would have had to do is wipe out the leadership and major military installations. There was never any need for him to hurt a single non-combatant.
He could have taken out only Tuon, disrupting the Seanchan leadership. Destroyed all the ships which would have freed the Sea Folk to ferry food freely and quickly. And struck major and decisive blows to the army itself, demonstrating the ability to crush the Seanchan and forcing them back to the negotiation table.
I never understood why attacking the mostly civilian capital was even an option. Another sign of Rand being crazy lunatic at that point I guess.
Will Rand bow to the Crystal Throne?
16/02/2010 07:03:12 PM
- 2044 Views
I lean towards somethng like this as a result of the end of tGS.
16/02/2010 08:24:20 PM
- 1046 Views
So you think him submitting to the Seanchan is a good thing?
17/02/2010 07:25:13 PM
- 957 Views
It's WoT. You win by surrendering. Metaphysical judo, if you will.
17/02/2010 11:03:22 PM
- 843 Views
Re: It's WoT. You win by surrendering. Metaphysical judo, if you will.
17/02/2010 11:41:11 PM
- 793 Views
Re: It's WoT. You win by surrendering. Metaphysical judo, if you will.
18/02/2010 03:23:39 AM
- 744 Views
Re: It's WoT. You win by surrendering. Metaphysical judo, if you will.
18/02/2010 03:38:04 AM
- 826 Views
Re: It's WoT. You win by surrendering. Metaphysical judo, if you will.
19/02/2010 03:18:35 PM
- 867 Views
Re: I lean towards somethng like this as a result of the end of tGS.
18/02/2010 07:18:44 AM
- 782 Views
Re: I lean towards somethng like this as a result of the end of tGS.
18/02/2010 01:22:49 PM
- 786 Views
Why everyone's loving Seanchan?
18/02/2010 02:41:07 PM
- 767 Views
As I said - all of Randland's political systems have strengths and weaknesses.
18/02/2010 05:46:40 PM
- 644 Views
I've been saying since wotmania that they are no worse than anyone else.
19/02/2010 03:23:22 PM
- 794 Views
Re: I've been saying since wotmania that they are no worse than anyone else.
19/02/2010 06:13:08 PM
- 712 Views
Re: I've been saying since wotmania that they are no worse than anyone else.
19/02/2010 07:37:25 PM
- 845 Views
the entire system of Seekers isn't an abuse of power? Bethamin winds up fleeing due to her fear of
20/02/2010 12:13:52 AM
- 831 Views
No, they're the only group that seems to pay more than lip service to the concept of responsibility
20/02/2010 03:37:58 PM
- 733 Views
You asked for an example of abuse of power. The Seekers are a clear abuse no better than any
20/02/2010 04:42:06 PM
- 1090 Views
Thanks for the perspective of outsiders and the behavior of a Darkfriend. THAT's good info!
24/02/2010 01:26:39 PM
- 1006 Views
Re: Why everyone's loving Seanchan?
19/02/2010 04:27:13 PM
- 681 Views
Re: Why everyone's loving Seanchan?
19/02/2010 05:41:53 PM
- 852 Views