Active Users:831 Time:15/11/2024 10:03:28 AM
Re: Why everyone's loving Seanchan? Datakim Send a noteboard - 19/02/2010 05:41:53 PM

I really believe that this would have been the ideal thing to do. There will probably be a compromise of some sorts in the next two books, but to cripple the Seanchan would have made sense and been my action if I was Rand.


Very true. Rand originally intended to destroy the palace and the ships with balefire, then rain fire on the whole city causing panic and mass death. He chose not to go through with his attack, because the people in Ebou Dar showed him compassion when he got sick. He was unable to hurt them.

My question would be, why the heck was he planning on attacking the city itself in the first place? How does that make any sense? I mean all he would have had to do is wipe out the leadership and major military installations. There was never any need for him to hurt a single non-combatant.

He could have taken out only Tuon, disrupting the Seanchan leadership. Destroyed all the ships which would have freed the Sea Folk to ferry food freely and quickly. And struck major and decisive blows to the army itself, demonstrating the ability to crush the Seanchan and forcing them back to the negotiation table.

I never understood why attacking the mostly civilian capital was even an option. Another sign of Rand being crazy lunatic at that point I guess.
Reply to message
Will Rand bow to the Crystal Throne? - 16/02/2010 07:03:12 PM 2044 Views
Re: Will Rand bow to the Crystal Throne? - 16/02/2010 07:07:51 PM 1080 Views
Like I said below.... - 16/02/2010 07:33:59 PM 879 Views
I lean towards somethng like this as a result of the end of tGS. - 16/02/2010 08:24:20 PM 1046 Views
Yeah, Rand doesn't have many options left - 16/02/2010 09:13:26 PM 776 Views
Ignore this ... double post.... - 16/02/2010 09:13:35 PM 716 Views
So you think him submitting to the Seanchan is a good thing? - 17/02/2010 07:25:13 PM 957 Views
It's WoT. You win by surrendering. Metaphysical judo, if you will. - 17/02/2010 11:03:22 PM 843 Views
Re: It's WoT. You win by surrendering. Metaphysical judo, if you will. - 17/02/2010 11:41:11 PM 793 Views
Re: It's WoT. You win by surrendering. Metaphysical judo, if you will. - 18/02/2010 03:23:39 AM 744 Views
Re: It's WoT. You win by surrendering. Metaphysical judo, if you will. - 18/02/2010 03:38:04 AM 826 Views
Perhaps if they reform, other rulers will accept them. - 18/02/2010 05:59:16 AM 810 Views
Re: I lean towards somethng like this as a result of the end of tGS. - 18/02/2010 07:18:44 AM 782 Views
Why everyone's loving Seanchan? - 18/02/2010 02:41:07 PM 767 Views
Re: Why everyone's loving Seanchan? - 19/02/2010 07:48:07 AM 804 Views
I've been saying since wotmania that they are no worse than anyone else. - 19/02/2010 03:23:22 PM 795 Views
the entire system of Seekers isn't an abuse of power? Bethamin winds up fleeing due to her fear of - 20/02/2010 12:13:52 AM 831 Views
Agree - 20/02/2010 01:04:26 AM 863 Views
Re: Agree - 20/02/2010 03:46:03 PM 767 Views
Re: Why everyone's loving Seanchan? - 19/02/2010 04:27:13 PM 681 Views
Re: Why everyone's loving Seanchan? - 19/02/2010 05:41:08 PM 712 Views
Re: Why everyone's loving Seanchan? - 19/02/2010 05:41:53 PM 853 Views
Re: Will Rand bow to the Crystal Throne? - 16/02/2010 09:51:36 PM 909 Views
I think it's a false prophecy - 17/02/2010 12:39:23 AM 869 Views
"Bow, or be bowed." *NM* - 18/02/2010 03:39:04 PM 490 Views
Submit to Fortuona - 02/03/2010 10:02:31 AM 694 Views
Just A Possibility - 02/03/2010 09:52:20 PM 729 Views

Reply to Message