A thought that occured to me, and I'd like your opinion...
Phelix Send a noteboard - 18/12/2009 07:38:29 PM
IIRC, Wilders/Sparkers tend to be stronger than women who learn to touch the source. Correct me if I'm wrong on that.
Now, we also know that because the Tower was not actively recruiting, the majority of women who can channel are not found by the Tower.
If sparkers tend to be stronger than learners, and the majority are not associated with the Tower because they simply were not found, then the bulk of the women who should occupy the "average/strong" level were not found.
We also know that the majority of women who begin channeling on their own die of it. I cannot recall if it's 2/3 or 3/4 of women who touch the source without guidance die of it. The ones that survive often have blocks (as RPA mentioned in his reply above).
EDIT: It's actually 4/5 of women who touch the source without training die of it.
So, from those thoughts, I would suggest that the bulk of the women that would be considered "strong" by the Tower died from lack of training.
Now, we also know that because the Tower was not actively recruiting, the majority of women who can channel are not found by the Tower.
If sparkers tend to be stronger than learners, and the majority are not associated with the Tower because they simply were not found, then the bulk of the women who should occupy the "average/strong" level were not found.
We also know that the majority of women who begin channeling on their own die of it. I cannot recall if it's 2/3 or 3/4 of women who touch the source without guidance die of it. The ones that survive often have blocks (as RPA mentioned in his reply above).
EDIT: It's actually 4/5 of women who touch the source without training die of it.
So, from those thoughts, I would suggest that the bulk of the women that would be considered "strong" by the Tower died from lack of training.
I was Phelix on wotmania, I will always be Phelix in the "real" world, and now I am Phelix on RAFO.
You will make all kinds of mistakes; but as long as you are generous and true and also fierce you cannot hurt the world or even seriously distress her.- Churchill
*MySmiley*
You will make all kinds of mistakes; but as long as you are generous and true and also fierce you cannot hurt the world or even seriously distress her.- Churchill
*MySmiley*
This message last edited by Phelix on 18/12/2009 at 08:07:55 PM
The One Power Bell Curve: Proof that it is not centered on 50% of the strongest channeler's strength
18/12/2009 08:37:55 AM
- 1423 Views
I always thought the curve was one sided
18/12/2009 01:17:32 PM
- 815 Views
The Curve only refers to the channeling population, not to non-channelers.
18/12/2009 01:56:25 PM
- 819 Views
I would say that your sample is flawed.
18/12/2009 05:02:02 PM
- 887 Views
It doesn't matter...
18/12/2009 10:02:38 PM
- 750 Views
But, it sort of does.
18/12/2009 10:43:08 PM
- 808 Views
So you're saying that no modern Aes Sedai are even of average strength?
18/12/2009 10:51:01 PM
- 896 Views
The Tower is restricted to the middle...
18/12/2009 05:35:03 PM
- 971 Views
Two things...
18/12/2009 09:28:25 PM
- 806 Views
The culling theory...
18/12/2009 09:36:34 PM
- 754 Views
The culling theory applies to the ENTIRE population, not just Aes Sedai...
18/12/2009 09:42:31 PM
- 877 Views
Several more things...
18/12/2009 11:26:19 PM
- 901 Views
You don't understand your own model...
18/12/2009 11:38:05 PM
- 921 Views
So RJ was wrong about Bell Curve distribution?
19/12/2009 06:03:24 PM
- 814 Views
So, Aviendha trumps RJ? A woman who, as late as tGS, doesn't know what she's doing with the OP?
19/12/2009 06:12:42 PM
- 802 Views
Age-Related Sample Bias
18/12/2009 06:41:03 PM
- 766 Views
I have no problem with that...but it implies that the average woman today isn't at 50% of Lanfear...
18/12/2009 09:46:00 PM
- 887 Views
Partially agreed...
18/12/2009 10:13:46 PM
- 788 Views
Well, the Aes Sedai are the only group that we have detailed strength info about...
18/12/2009 10:26:48 PM
- 886 Views
Sharina is AS ... she'd be dead in a few years if she hadn't gone to the Tower *NM*
28/12/2009 01:08:20 AM
- 865 Views
A thought that occured to me, and I'd like your opinion...
18/12/2009 07:38:29 PM
- 768 Views
Is it just my bad memory or is one of the wondergirls not a sparker?
18/12/2009 10:12:59 PM
- 756 Views
Easier sulution, and real example.
18/12/2009 10:03:20 PM
- 821 Views
And that is indeed the solution I feel most comfortable with...
18/12/2009 10:08:40 PM
- 778 Views
Re: And that is indeed the solution I feel most comfortable with...
19/12/2009 11:39:31 AM
- 1013 Views
Dude, Seriously?
18/12/2009 10:19:25 PM
- 790 Views
Indeed, and that's why I propose that...
18/12/2009 10:31:23 PM
- 786 Views
So RJ used two separate scales, one actual one relative, to explain the same thing?
18/12/2009 11:33:20 PM
- 748 Views

Yes, "Bell Curve" does not mean Gausian. Or normal distribution.
19/12/2009 11:24:10 PM
- 767 Views
I'm sorry, but I've never heard of a non-Gaussian bell curve. Can you prove its existence? *NM*
20/12/2009 03:24:22 AM
- 439 Views
Maybe people in my field just use the term in a non-technical way. We do things with ...
21/12/2009 07:24:43 PM
- 726 Views
That's because outliers in IQ tests are excluded form the curve. *NM*
18/12/2009 11:31:23 PM
- 444 Views
Re: The One Power Bell Curve: Proof that it is not centered on 50% of the strongest channeler's stre
19/12/2009 06:02:34 PM
- 719 Views
Mathmatically this is very close to the system I proposed in another thread
27/12/2009 01:23:51 AM
- 727 Views
Re: The One Power Bell Curve:
27/12/2009 10:05:33 PM
- 885 Views
What makes you think Alviarin is "middling"?
27/12/2009 10:28:13 PM
- 1084 Views