I don't believe in slavery, and especially not when it is used to change a conscious being with free will into an automaton. The Seanchan sacrifice a lot of what I consider to be human attributes in exchange for order.
Even worse, Tuon and other sul'dam are channelers, as well. According to their standards, even if they choose not to learn, they are still "unclean". She is very much a hypocrit.
Understanding their history doesn't excuse their inhumanity, and I'm not too impressed with peace achieved by tyranny - that is esentially what the Seanchan impose.
Even worse, Tuon and other sul'dam are channelers, as well. According to their standards, even if they choose not to learn, they are still "unclean". She is very much a hypocrit.
Understanding their history doesn't excuse their inhumanity, and I'm not too impressed with peace achieved by tyranny - that is esentially what the Seanchan impose.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Is anyone angered by the Seanchan and a'dam?
- 30/10/2009 11:14:00 PM
1436 Views
Yes, but not me
- 30/10/2009 11:32:45 PM
703 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam
- 30/10/2009 11:39:45 PM
802 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam
- 30/10/2009 11:45:29 PM
654 Views
Except the Seanchan are not spoiled chidlren who mistake "wishful thinking" for a plan
- 31/10/2009 04:48:45 AM
688 Views
Or he could have used the Choedan Kal
- 31/10/2009 12:21:42 PM
646 Views
What Choedan Kal? *NM*
- 31/10/2009 10:15:24 PM
249 Views
For what?
- 31/10/2009 12:03:57 AM
642 Views
if he was it wasn't on purpose. I think he was just actively trying to use his ta'verenness *NM*
- 31/10/2009 12:15:32 AM
257 Views
I dont think it's compulsion.
- 31/10/2009 12:16:00 AM
582 Views
Actually, I think it's the other way around. 
- 31/10/2009 12:21:49 AM
557 Views
- 31/10/2009 12:21:49 AM
557 Views
I don't care for Tuon at all. I'd be okay if her and the Seanchan were obliterated. *NM*
- 31/10/2009 12:44:22 AM
254 Views
And how is that any different from me with Egwene (except she & I are the same race)? *NM*
- 31/10/2009 04:51:17 AM
260 Views
Why not Highlords in Tear?
- 31/10/2009 02:10:07 AM
678 Views
You dont really get it.
- 31/10/2009 12:23:35 PM
529 Views
Not at all. Their position is perfectly justified by their experiences.
- 31/10/2009 04:29:25 AM
621 Views
The a'dam and leashing of channelers does not change the fact that the OP can be misued...
- 31/10/2009 09:17:20 AM
617 Views
Which is why people should NOT be MORE angered toward Seanchan than toward WT.
- 31/10/2009 06:22:13 PM
509 Views
That's complete hogwash.
- 31/10/2009 10:23:50 PM
558 Views
Using the word "Hogwash" is inviting flames, but I will be nice about it
- 01/11/2009 05:44:16 AM
581 Views
Re: Using the word "Hogwash" is inviting flames, but I will be nice about it
- 05/11/2009 02:54:52 AM
877 Views
Well that was rather silly.
- 31/10/2009 12:27:03 PM
486 Views
And a generation later, the same old problem arises. New channelers, with no one to stop them.
- 31/10/2009 10:28:35 PM
514 Views
Several valid points...
- 31/10/2009 05:17:09 PM
564 Views
I wonder what if Egwene happen to be a child kidnapped at Flame and sent to WT
- 31/10/2009 06:30:34 PM
570 Views
The sul'dam should be destroyed
- 31/10/2009 05:14:06 AM
529 Views
The people themselves shouldn't be.
- 31/10/2009 05:26:08 AM
511 Views
Only the Empress can remove the custom
- 31/10/2009 05:48:09 AM
532 Views
Due to their conditioning.
- 31/10/2009 06:03:32 AM
545 Views
She will 
(and ya, sul'dam become sul'dam from age 13-18 usually) *NM*
- 31/10/2009 06:12:48 AM
250 Views
(and ya, sul'dam become sul'dam from age 13-18 usually) *NM*
- 31/10/2009 06:12:48 AM
250 Views
I think the a'dam is the perfect solution for Blacks and the Shaido 'Wise Ones'.
- 01/11/2009 02:51:27 AM
589 Views
Yes.
- 04/11/2009 06:15:08 PM
464 Views