Active Users:1285 Time:23/11/2024 06:45:09 AM
Yes. RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 04/11/2009 06:15:08 PM
I don't believe in slavery, and especially not when it is used to change a conscious being with free will into an automaton. The Seanchan sacrifice a lot of what I consider to be human attributes in exchange for order.

Even worse, Tuon and other sul'dam are channelers, as well. According to their standards, even if they choose not to learn, they are still "unclean". She is very much a hypocrit.

Understanding their history doesn't excuse their inhumanity, and I'm not too impressed with peace achieved by tyranny - that is esentially what the Seanchan impose.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Is anyone angered by the Seanchan and a'dam? - 30/10/2009 11:14:00 PM 1449 Views
Yes, but not me - 30/10/2009 11:32:45 PM 712 Views
Re: Yes, but not me - 31/10/2009 12:49:42 AM 655 Views
I hated him - 31/10/2009 12:57:52 AM 648 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam - 30/10/2009 11:39:45 PM 825 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam - 30/10/2009 11:45:29 PM 666 Views
Except the Seanchan are not spoiled chidlren who mistake "wishful thinking" for a plan - 31/10/2009 04:48:45 AM 699 Views
Or he could have used the Choedan Kal - 31/10/2009 12:21:42 PM 655 Views
What Choedan Kal? *NM* - 31/10/2009 10:15:24 PM 254 Views
The big shiney ball thing he destroyed at the end of the book - 01/11/2009 07:50:15 PM 604 Views
Destroyed. My point exactly. *NM* - 06/11/2009 04:40:16 AM 240 Views
For what? - 31/10/2009 12:03:57 AM 652 Views
I dont think it's compulsion. - 31/10/2009 12:16:00 AM 594 Views
Actually, I think it's the other way around. - 31/10/2009 12:21:49 AM 566 Views
He did the same thing with Cady - 31/10/2009 12:25:51 AM 580 Views
Personally, I thought he was using the TP to do those things. - 04/11/2009 07:37:31 PM 539 Views
It wasn't Compulsion...Sanderson just sort of messed up IMO - 04/11/2009 11:38:38 PM 483 Views
No - 31/10/2009 12:06:13 AM 607 Views
Why not Highlords in Tear? - 31/10/2009 02:10:07 AM 691 Views
You dont really get it. - 31/10/2009 12:23:35 PM 539 Views
That is just POV trap - 31/10/2009 04:20:07 PM 529 Views
Flawed Argument - 31/10/2009 08:54:05 PM 526 Views
Not at all. Their position is perfectly justified by their experiences. - 31/10/2009 04:29:25 AM 635 Views
The a'dam and leashing of channelers does not change the fact that the OP can be misued... - 31/10/2009 09:17:20 AM 624 Views
Which is why people should NOT be MORE angered toward Seanchan than toward WT. - 31/10/2009 06:22:13 PM 521 Views
That's complete hogwash. - 31/10/2009 10:23:50 PM 572 Views
Think it through - 31/10/2009 10:25:08 PM 655 Views
I have... - 31/10/2009 11:05:20 PM 622 Views
Re: I have... - 01/11/2009 02:27:20 AM 788 Views
Well that was rather silly. - 31/10/2009 12:27:03 PM 494 Views
Several valid points... - 31/10/2009 05:17:09 PM 584 Views
The sul'dam should be destroyed - 31/10/2009 05:14:06 AM 547 Views
The people themselves shouldn't be. - 31/10/2009 05:26:08 AM 526 Views
^ *NM* - 31/10/2009 05:33:04 AM 232 Views
Only the Empress can remove the custom - 31/10/2009 05:48:09 AM 542 Views
Due to their conditioning. - 31/10/2009 06:03:32 AM 556 Views
Random - 31/10/2009 10:26:34 AM 534 Views
Agreed - 31/10/2009 02:52:33 PM 525 Views
Yes. - 04/11/2009 06:15:08 PM 479 Views

Reply to Message