Active Users:940 Time:23/11/2024 10:46:30 AM
Re: Then... fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM

In my original post I said that stilling requires a channeler capable of precision weaving i.e. razor sharp flows. There is no evidence that a channeler weaker than Egwene or Elayne can pull off such deft weaves (and there are many quotes available on this issue), and thus Moiraine couldn't either.

Hmmm...

What you said was...
However, I think it's a strength thing too. In my opinion you have to be able to destroy another channeler's conduit to the Source. Therefore I don't think someone like Moiraine could still another channeler, unless that channeler was Morgase or Sorilea, and maybe not even then. Very strong channelers like Egwene and Nynaeve can make razor sharp shields backed up with a lot of saidar, so that when they hit you they just rip into your connection to the Source, and leave you ruined forever.

It seemed pretty clear you were talking about strength. Hence the confusion.
This message last edited by fionwe1987 on 06/10/2009 at 12:25:38 AM
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 1979 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 583 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 306 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 736 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 962 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1088 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 690 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1253 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 708 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 272 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 985 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 571 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 596 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 541 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 592 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 657 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 661 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 562 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 581 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 639 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 573 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 624 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 773 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 667 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 607 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 702 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 691 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 762 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 572 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 796 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 647 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1324 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 669 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 747 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1258 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 580 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 682 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1354 Views

Reply to Message