Active Users:341 Time:05/04/2025 06:04:07 PM
Re: Then... fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM

In my original post I said that stilling requires a channeler capable of precision weaving i.e. razor sharp flows. There is no evidence that a channeler weaker than Egwene or Elayne can pull off such deft weaves (and there are many quotes available on this issue), and thus Moiraine couldn't either.

Hmmm...

What you said was...
However, I think it's a strength thing too. In my opinion you have to be able to destroy another channeler's conduit to the Source. Therefore I don't think someone like Moiraine could still another channeler, unless that channeler was Morgase or Sorilea, and maybe not even then. Very strong channelers like Egwene and Nynaeve can make razor sharp shields backed up with a lot of saidar, so that when they hit you they just rip into your connection to the Source, and leave you ruined forever.

It seemed pretty clear you were talking about strength. Hence the confusion.
This message last edited by fionwe1987 on 06/10/2009 at 12:25:38 AM
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 2061 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 658 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 340 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 802 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 1048 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1162 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 775 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1329 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 781 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 304 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 1071 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 649 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 676 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 617 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 681 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 726 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 743 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 639 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 656 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 718 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 658 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 698 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 861 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 744 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 689 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 792 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 767 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 826 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 656 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 875 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 730 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1410 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 744 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 821 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1361 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 655 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 769 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1441 Views

Reply to Message