I think in these examples you cited the channelers lost their ability to channel, because someone else violently broke a weave (especially a shield) by them, while they were channeling. This obviously doesn't seem to be the "officially" precise stilling weave, but rather like a forced explosion of the ability to channel (in this respect rather similar to burning out). However, this form of stilling someone seems quite risky, because it requires that your opponent channels, and it probably might kill him.
I only dimly remember this, but doesn't Siuan even indicate that she was stilled by a circle of AS in a process that took some time. So, apparently the real stilling is a bit more complicated, because it's basically a very delicate "surgically" removal of the ability to channel.
Since Rand & Co. likely don't know how this exactly works (or e.g. Cadsuane doesn't want to give it away), it would explain why they don't do it.
I only dimly remember this, but doesn't Siuan even indicate that she was stilled by a circle of AS in a process that took some time. So, apparently the real stilling is a bit more complicated, because it's basically a very delicate "surgically" removal of the ability to channel.
Since Rand & Co. likely don't know how this exactly works (or e.g. Cadsuane doesn't want to give it away), it would explain why they don't do it.
Still the Darkfriends.
03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM
- 1979 Views
Makes sense, but...
03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM
- 736 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how
03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM
- 962 Views
Re: Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know h
04/10/2009 12:55:55 AM
- 1240 Views
Is this the real stilling?
04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM
- 1089 Views
It's real stilling
04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM
- 690 Views
Re: It's real stilling
04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM
- 1253 Views
Re: It's real stilling
04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM
- 708 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM*
04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM
- 272 Views
Not in my opinion
05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM
- 985 Views
How does that respond to what I said?
05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM
- 571 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said?
05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM
- 596 Views
I disagree.
04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM
- 657 Views
Re: I disagree.
05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM
- 661 Views
Then...
05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM
- 562 Views
Re: Then...
05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM
- 581 Views
I'd like you to clear this up...
06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM
- 624 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up...
06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM
- 773 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up...
07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM
- 667 Views
Sounds good, but the Aes Sedai aren't known for making the most logical decisions. Nice Post *NM*
03/10/2009 07:47:36 PM
- 306 Views
oops i meant to put "aren't" but i accidently put are. It's edited now. Sorry for any confusion *NM*
03/10/2009 10:26:50 PM
- 292 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends.
04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM
- 796 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends.
04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM
- 647 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends.
04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM
- 1324 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth
04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM
- 580 Views
The only thing worse than ignoring morality for pragmatism is moralizing a non-moral issue
04/10/2009 09:36:43 PM
- 691 Views