Active Users:482 Time:05/04/2025 06:23:00 PM
Is this the real stilling? Etzel Send a noteboard - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM
I think in these examples you cited the channelers lost their ability to channel, because someone else violently broke a weave (especially a shield) by them, while they were channeling. This obviously doesn't seem to be the "officially" precise stilling weave, but rather like a forced explosion of the ability to channel (in this respect rather similar to burning out). However, this form of stilling someone seems quite risky, because it requires that your opponent channels, and it probably might kill him.

I only dimly remember this, but doesn't Siuan even indicate that she was stilled by a circle of AS in a process that took some time. So, apparently the real stilling is a bit more complicated, because it's basically a very delicate "surgically" removal of the ability to channel.

Since Rand & Co. likely don't know how this exactly works (or e.g. Cadsuane doesn't want to give it away), it would explain why they don't do it.
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 2061 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 659 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 340 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 804 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 1049 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1163 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 776 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1330 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 781 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 304 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 1072 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 649 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 677 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 618 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 681 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 728 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 744 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 639 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 658 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 718 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 660 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 700 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 863 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 745 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 690 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 792 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 767 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 827 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 658 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 876 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 731 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1412 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 744 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 821 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1363 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 656 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 769 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1441 Views

Reply to Message