Active Users:945 Time:23/11/2024 10:45:53 AM
Is this the real stilling? Etzel Send a noteboard - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM
I think in these examples you cited the channelers lost their ability to channel, because someone else violently broke a weave (especially a shield) by them, while they were channeling. This obviously doesn't seem to be the "officially" precise stilling weave, but rather like a forced explosion of the ability to channel (in this respect rather similar to burning out). However, this form of stilling someone seems quite risky, because it requires that your opponent channels, and it probably might kill him.

I only dimly remember this, but doesn't Siuan even indicate that she was stilled by a circle of AS in a process that took some time. So, apparently the real stilling is a bit more complicated, because it's basically a very delicate "surgically" removal of the ability to channel.

Since Rand & Co. likely don't know how this exactly works (or e.g. Cadsuane doesn't want to give it away), it would explain why they don't do it.
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 1979 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 583 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 306 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 736 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 962 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1088 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 690 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1253 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 708 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 272 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 985 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 571 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 595 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 541 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 592 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 657 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 661 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 562 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 581 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 638 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 573 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 624 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 773 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 667 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 607 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 702 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 691 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 762 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 572 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 796 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 647 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1324 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 669 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 747 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1258 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 580 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 682 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1354 Views

Reply to Message