Active Users:1151 Time:23/11/2024 12:37:58 AM
I think you are getting your hopes up unjustifiably. Narg Send a noteboard - 26/09/2012 07:59:37 PM
I guess I don't see how this adds to Demandred's character development at all. This says almost nothing about Demandred and a lot about Rand. We already knew that Lews Therin was arrogant. It doesn't give Demandred any less of a cartoon bad guy reason for becoming what he has become.

Demandred is still the comic book character that went over to the Shadow because his pride couldn't stand being in Lews Therin's shadow any longer. So what if Lews Therin was kind of a prick in the way he kept outshining him? Demandred's motivation for trying to bring about the end of all creation as we know it is still that Lews Therin was a little bit better than him and a prick.

Demandred may turn out to be a highlight in the book, but only because he has perhaps laid some awesomely competent plans, not because his backstory is suddenly richer.



A little learning is a dangerous thing.
Reply to message
AMOL chapter 1: Demandred - 26/09/2012 05:56:20 PM 1783 Views
I found this utterly refreshing. A Forsaken who isn't 100% villain, and LTT who wasn't 100% the hero - 26/09/2012 06:50:40 PM 1205 Views
But... - 26/09/2012 07:57:20 PM 1073 Views
I think you are getting your hopes up unjustifiably. - 26/09/2012 07:59:37 PM 869 Views
Getting my hopes up that RJ improved his portrayal of villains, yes. - 26/09/2012 09:20:50 PM 1067 Views
That's just ridiculous... - 27/09/2012 02:09:42 AM 772 Views
Quit being such a Forsaken FanBoy - 27/09/2012 12:55:41 AM 764 Views
I think you're going to be disappointed - 27/09/2012 07:17:30 AM 1094 Views
Undoubtedly I will be... - 27/09/2012 07:59:46 AM 907 Views
Re: Undoubtedly I will be... - 27/09/2012 09:16:29 AM 981 Views
The duel with Lanfear killed hundreds of innocent bystanders? - 27/09/2012 03:40:14 PM 833 Views
Re: The duel with Lanfear killed hundreds of innocent bystanders? - 27/09/2012 03:45:22 PM 843 Views
Re: AMOL chapter 1: Demandred - 26/09/2012 09:35:29 PM 964 Views

Reply to Message