Active Users:298 Time:11/04/2025 05:51:51 AM
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM
is that plate armor NEEDS to dent. It needs to cushion the blow and conduct a transfer of energy. Unless c-dar absorbs all the energy you put into it (if I remember correctly, it doesn't), it's going to be worse than metal.


And, regardless, it's just not an efficient process. Others have pointed out the flaws with both production and who would wear it. There's no point in giving it to the generals (they aren't on the lines), and you can't produce it in high enough quantities to make it worth distributing to the common solider.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
This message last edited by LadyLorraine on 13/02/2012 at 02:38:18 PM
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1482 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 945 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 499 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 846 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 947 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 457 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 838 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 1036 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 829 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 495 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 811 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 954 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 424 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 1008 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 879 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 848 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 846 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 882 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 930 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 775 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 849 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 736 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 874 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 723 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 739 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 854 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 734 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 722 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 571 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 839 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 785 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 786 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 895 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 729 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 747 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 847 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 820 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 781 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 690 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 796 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 710 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 841 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 1004 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 723 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 709 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 861 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 743 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 741 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 913 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 726 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 717 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 779 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 462 Views

Reply to Message