Active Users:457 Time:26/11/2024 06:48:33 AM
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM
is that plate armor NEEDS to dent. It needs to cushion the blow and conduct a transfer of energy. Unless c-dar absorbs all the energy you put into it (if I remember correctly, it doesn't), it's going to be worse than metal.


And, regardless, it's just not an efficient process. Others have pointed out the flaws with both production and who would wear it. There's no point in giving it to the generals (they aren't on the lines), and you can't produce it in high enough quantities to make it worth distributing to the common solider.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
This message last edited by LadyLorraine on 13/02/2012 at 02:38:18 PM
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1409 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 856 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 456 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 760 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 859 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 417 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 757 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 952 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 746 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 457 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 731 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 857 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 389 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 924 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 796 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 761 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 758 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 805 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 845 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 688 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 757 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 660 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 798 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 642 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 657 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 773 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 647 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 642 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 532 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 750 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 685 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 701 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 803 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 642 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 660 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 755 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 737 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 702 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 606 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 737 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 628 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 754 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 920 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 649 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 624 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 764 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 658 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 653 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 823 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 646 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 632 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 697 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 424 Views

Reply to Message