Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this?
RandAllThor Send a noteboard - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM
Are you willing to be the one who makes sure the poster actually has a pre-release copy? Or are you just willing to make more work for someone else? If you are actually willing to do the actual work, how pray tell will you do that? What kind of proof can the reviewers provide? Scanned copyright page? anybody can fake those. ISBN #? already published. Get real man.
I don't think any proof should be necessary at all (see my comment about how wotmania was filled with spoiler-free reviews for at least the last three books with no negative effects to speak of). No system for prooving something like this would be foolproof in today's day and age, of course.
Umm...You ever heard of Napster? All it would take would be one quote from the book and TOR would be completely within it's rights to shut RAFO down. Are YOU personally willing to be legally responsible for something that someone posts here? Sorry but I'm not. And sure, anybody at any time can post anything here. But by providing a spot for pirates to post what they want, the situation changes to "abetting and encouraging".
I'm missing the Napster connection here. RAFO has stipulated that reviews be spoiler/content-free, so noone would be allowed to post quotes from the book. One's impressions about a book, CD, movie, or any other copyrighted work are not copyrightable as far as I know. On a side note, do you really think every RAFO member would be personally liable to Tor if one member posted one quote from the book?
If the admins have a serious concern about legal liability, I say don't allow the reviews. If the only serious concern is one of authenticity/credibility, though, I don't see the problem. RAFO isn't vauching for the reviews in any way, and no WoT sites that I know of have been made laughing stocks in the past over silly or just plain inaccurate reviews.
This message last edited by RandAllThor on 22/09/2009 at 12:23:36 PM
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board?
20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM
- 1583 Views
No, if people want to review the book, they can do it on their own blogs. *NM*
20/09/2009 09:27:18 AM
- 423 Views
Yes. Visitors who don't want them should simply avoid reading them. *NM*
20/09/2009 02:42:15 PM
- 488 Views
If it's going to be in a separate section, and it's spoiler free, why is "NO" even an option?
20/09/2009 05:04:11 PM
- 846 Views
Absolutley! ^ If they don't want to read that section then it shouldn't be a problem. *NM*
21/09/2009 04:24:37 AM
- 448 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board?
20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM
- 734 Views
Yes-- reviews are an essential part of any fanpage-- People have the option not to read them though *NM*
20/09/2009 06:53:42 PM
- 416 Views
Why is No even an option? there supposedly wont be spoilers duh *NM*
20/09/2009 11:40:37 PM
- 410 Views
Yes. If a review is clearly marked as such, please who don't want to read it don't have to. *NM*
21/09/2009 12:59:54 PM
- 828 Views
If they are quarantined in an announced post, I don't see and problem for me, so yes I guess
21/09/2009 01:09:41 PM
- 788 Views
No
21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM
- 805 Views
I think you missread the rules...
21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM
- 1267 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work?
22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM
- 772 Views
I'm strongly against it
22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM
- 910 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list
22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM
- 846 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it
22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM
- 776 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this?
22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM
- 742 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this?
22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM
- 907 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it
22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM
- 930 Views
I had no idea about these legalities.
22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM
- 729 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities.
22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM
- 634 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak.
22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM
- 702 Views
Ever hear of Napster?
22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM
- 697 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself.
23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM
- 823 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself.
23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM
- 979 Views