You were saying that it should have been impossible for her to show the Seanchan the gateway.
"The oath against using the OP as a weapon should have prevented Elaida or any captive Aes Sedai from showing the Seanchan Travelling."
Yeah, it COULD have been an Accepted who saw the Travelling weave. It didnt HAVE to be Elaida (or any Aes Sedai) who knew the weave was going to cause death.
Explain the actions of Perrin's Aes Sedai in ToM. The weave Perrin asked them to do was NOT going to cause any direct deaths, yet they refused saying they could not help.
Elaida, oh no you didn't!
04/12/2010 06:38:22 AM
- 1947 Views
The weave will not directly result in death
04/12/2010 06:54:20 AM
- 862 Views
Re: The weave will not directly result in death
04/12/2010 07:08:50 AM
- 777 Views
Wrong for two reasons
04/12/2010 09:10:03 AM
- 935 Views
Re: Wrong for two reasons
05/12/2010 08:39:02 AM
- 684 Views
you're forgetting she was collared.
05/12/2010 09:01:27 AM
- 572 Views
Re: you're forgetting she was collared.
05/12/2010 09:08:30 AM
- 659 Views
uhm, no that's not all you're saying.
05/12/2010 09:14:47 AM
- 662 Views
Yeah I am
05/12/2010 09:17:48 AM
- 591 Views
no. dude i gave you a direct quote from your own statement. that is not what you said
05/12/2010 09:20:14 AM
- 728 Views
Go dude yourself brother.
05/12/2010 09:27:33 AM
- 586 Views
wow i just...wow.
05/12/2010 09:33:41 AM
- 673 Views
Re: wow i just...wow.
05/12/2010 09:45:47 AM
- 665 Views
yes well you genuinely seem to be having a problem comprehending your own statements.
05/12/2010 09:51:18 AM
- 545 Views
Well you genuinely seem to be retarded.
05/12/2010 09:59:19 AM
- 592 Views
I judge this based off your own reactions to other's statements
05/12/2010 10:05:58 AM
- 693 Views
I judge you based on your own statements towards me
05/12/2010 10:16:18 AM
- 624 Views
if all you did was disagree with me, we would not be having this discussion.
05/12/2010 10:25:36 AM
- 534 Views
Seconded "This"^ *NM*
04/12/2010 07:09:17 PM
- 281 Views
the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death
04/12/2010 02:55:13 PM
- 601 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death
05/12/2010 08:43:48 AM
- 682 Views
just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able.
05/12/2010 09:07:08 AM
- 631 Views
Re: just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able.
05/12/2010 09:11:28 AM
- 639 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM*
05/12/2010 09:13:42 AM
- 296 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM*
05/12/2010 09:13:43 AM
- 245 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death
06/12/2010 03:44:33 PM
- 586 Views
This is ridiculous. You can teach any weave, including Balefire. You just can't always use it. *NM*
05/12/2010 06:37:16 AM
- 253 Views
You can teach a weave so long as YOU believe that the weave won't be a weapon. Elaida knows better *NM*
05/12/2010 09:13:57 AM
- 295 Views
This is false, we've seen battle weaves taught since the start of the series.
05/12/2010 01:49:13 PM
- 558 Views
Right? and every AS seems to know how to make a fireball and call lightning
05/12/2010 02:44:45 PM
- 549 Views
There's another way she could have avoided it
05/12/2010 11:37:09 AM
- 586 Views
Re: There's another way she could have avoided it
05/12/2010 01:51:06 PM
- 941 Views