Active Users:877 Time:26/11/2024 08:29:49 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Yeah I am malekithe Send a noteboard - 05/12/2010 09:17:48 AM
You were saying that it should have been impossible for her to show the Seanchan the gateway.

"The oath against using the OP as a weapon should have prevented Elaida or any captive Aes Sedai from showing the Seanchan Travelling."


Yeah, it COULD have been an Accepted who saw the Travelling weave. It didnt HAVE to be Elaida (or any Aes Sedai) who knew the weave was going to cause death.

Explain the actions of Perrin's Aes Sedai in ToM. The weave Perrin asked them to do was NOT going to cause any direct deaths, yet they refused saying they could not help.
Reply to message
Elaida, oh no you didn't! malekithe - 04/12/2010 06:38:22 AM 1956 Views
The weave will not directly result in death Helene - 04/12/2010 06:54:20 AM 876 Views
Re: The weave will not directly result in death malekithe - 04/12/2010 07:08:50 AM 789 Views
Wrong for two reasons Voscaia Sedai - 04/12/2010 09:10:03 AM 947 Views
Only two? Usually he's wrong for eight reasons. *NM* Deadsy - 04/12/2010 09:47:37 AM 427 Views
Go jump in a lake malekithe - 05/12/2010 08:32:18 AM 673 Views
I wanted to be polite and mentioned just the major ones *NM* Voscaia Sedai - 05/12/2010 10:44:25 AM 387 Views
Thank you, Voscaia Sedai *NM* Evil_Monkey - 04/12/2010 08:51:58 PM 336 Views
Re: Wrong for two reasons malekithe - 05/12/2010 08:39:02 AM 693 Views
you're forgetting she was collared. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:01:27 AM 581 Views
Re: you're forgetting she was collared. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:08:30 AM 670 Views
uhm, no that's not all you're saying. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:14:47 AM 670 Views
Yeah I am malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:17:48 AM 603 Views
no. dude i gave you a direct quote from your own statement. that is not what you said LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:20:14 AM 739 Views
Go dude yourself brother. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:27:33 AM 600 Views
wow i just...wow. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:33:41 AM 689 Views
Re: wow i just...wow. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:45:47 AM 672 Views
yes well you genuinely seem to be having a problem comprehending your own statements. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:51:18 AM 557 Views
Well you genuinely seem to be retarded. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:59:19 AM 604 Views
I judge this based off your own reactions to other's statements LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 10:05:58 AM 703 Views
I judge you based on your own statements towards me malekithe - 05/12/2010 10:16:18 AM 633 Views
if all you did was disagree with me, we would not be having this discussion. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 10:25:36 AM 546 Views
This is why I replied the way I did *NM* Deadsy - 05/12/2010 10:51:54 AM 300 Views
go read the boooks more closely darius_sedai - 05/12/2010 02:34:11 PM 973 Views
Plain wrong. The weave doesn't kill in itself. Ashaman_Luc - 04/12/2010 02:34:00 PM 771 Views
Wrong malekithe - 05/12/2010 08:40:40 AM 598 Views
This redqueen - 04/12/2010 12:35:04 PM 622 Views
Seconded "This"^ *NM* LadyLorraine - 04/12/2010 07:09:17 PM 288 Views
Thirded "This"^ *NM* Voscaia Sedai - 05/12/2010 10:47:56 AM 341 Views
Re: Fourthed "This"^ *NM* alanna aes sedai - 05/12/2010 08:08:15 PM 296 Views
yep, he was just trolling I guess *NM* Lo'oris - 05/12/2010 01:58:32 PM 295 Views
the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death Ava - 04/12/2010 02:55:13 PM 609 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death malekithe - 05/12/2010 08:43:48 AM 693 Views
just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able. LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:07:08 AM 639 Views
Re: just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able. malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:11:28 AM 648 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM* LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:13:42 AM 301 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM* LadyLorraine - 05/12/2010 09:13:43 AM 249 Views
Yup, I guess that was what Elaida was thinking *NM* malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:15:21 AM 303 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death HyogaRott - 06/12/2010 03:44:33 PM 599 Views
It's actually come up in the books themselves darius_sedai - 04/12/2010 03:00:03 PM 749 Views
Re: Elaida, oh no you didn't! Zeratul - 04/12/2010 03:30:57 PM 651 Views
Elaida could teach them balefire and not break the Oaths. *NM* Gher - 04/12/2010 07:24:55 PM 285 Views
This is ridiculous. You can teach any weave, including Balefire. You just can't always use it. *NM* Marshall - 05/12/2010 06:37:16 AM 260 Views
You can teach a weave so long as YOU believe that the weave won't be a weapon. Elaida knows better *NM* malekithe - 05/12/2010 09:13:57 AM 302 Views
This is false, we've seen battle weaves taught since the start of the series. Lord Haart - 05/12/2010 01:49:13 PM 571 Views
Right? and every AS seems to know how to make a fireball and call lightning darius_sedai - 05/12/2010 02:44:45 PM 563 Views
that's where you are wrong darius_sedai - 05/12/2010 02:43:21 PM 570 Views
Re: Elaida, oh no you didn't! benxtaron - 05/12/2010 08:32:50 AM 780 Views
There's another way she could have avoided it redqueen - 05/12/2010 11:37:09 AM 601 Views
Re: There's another way she could have avoided it Lord Haart - 05/12/2010 01:51:06 PM 953 Views
Re: There's another way she could have avoided it Watcher - 06/12/2010 01:43:45 PM 589 Views
I disagree redqueen - 06/12/2010 02:29:46 PM 626 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes