it only appears that way if you look at only those two kings.
LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 02/12/2010 02:23:03 PM
look across the whole of history and you'll see that the love of the people doesn't relate to the money you spend on your court, but rather its appearance to the people. Yes, that does require the expenditure of money, but the people don't go "Oh well, look at all that gold he's spending on decorating his court while we starve!!!"
they go "look how majestic our king is, those french and spanish will be bloody well jealous about how grand our king and his court are!!!"
If this majesty starves the people, they won't be happy. Toward the end of his reign, when he was bleeding England dry from his flagrant expenditures, he was NOT a popular king. They quickly began to regret losing him during the unsettling years between him and Elizabeth, but that's more a "but Henry wasn't burning us!!"
Yes, money is part of the factoring that creates the apperance, but it is not what the people look at and if a king overspends and they suffer, the people will not look over it. French Revolution, anyone?
they go "look how majestic our king is, those french and spanish will be bloody well jealous about how grand our king and his court are!!!"
If this majesty starves the people, they won't be happy. Toward the end of his reign, when he was bleeding England dry from his flagrant expenditures, he was NOT a popular king. They quickly began to regret losing him during the unsettling years between him and Elizabeth, but that's more a "but Henry wasn't burning us!!"

Yes, money is part of the factoring that creates the apperance, but it is not what the people look at and if a king overspends and they suffer, the people will not look over it. French Revolution, anyone?
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Brilliant my ass
30/11/2010 07:08:46 PM
- 1481 Views
Nobles are interchangeable....
30/11/2010 07:32:50 PM
- 917 Views
for the large part, RJ's nobles weren't particularly deep either.
30/11/2010 08:15:07 PM
- 891 Views
Re: Brilliant my ass
30/11/2010 10:31:24 PM
- 831 Views
So owing money is so bad it's punishable with a fate worse than death?
01/12/2010 11:02:18 AM
- 811 Views
Re: So owing money is so bad it's punishable with a fate worse than death?
01/12/2010 11:05:37 AM
- 733 Views
Re: So owing money is so bad it's punishable with a fate worse than death?
02/12/2010 03:25:28 PM
- 714 Views
I really do not see how being given new lands and a new chance is "worse than death".
02/12/2010 04:13:53 PM
- 812 Views
Re: Brilliant my ass
01/12/2010 12:57:34 AM
- 804 Views
Interesting
01/12/2010 11:04:26 AM
- 702 Views
Re: Interesting
01/12/2010 11:07:02 AM
- 708 Views
Notice how people liked Henry VIII more than they liked Henry VII
01/12/2010 11:15:03 AM
- 706 Views
because of his "Kingly" behavior, in comparison to VII's lack thereof.
01/12/2010 08:26:26 PM
- 762 Views
I think you're making my point for me
02/12/2010 06:34:17 AM
- 705 Views
Re: I think you're making my point for me
02/12/2010 08:09:33 AM
- 677 Views
it only appears that way if you look at only those two kings.
02/12/2010 02:23:03 PM
- 699 Views
wasnt king henry VIII really fat, or was that another henry?*NM* *NM*
02/12/2010 04:33:50 AM
- 378 Views
He was not particularly fat until he was older.
02/12/2010 02:17:43 PM
- 749 Views