Because, presumably, Elaida's Foretelling should have had some hint of that. Plus, a confrontation with Rand will presumably be two-way, whereas Elaida's Prophesy seems to indicate just that Egwene will be pissed about something, and Rand will be informed of it.
The more I look at it, and the more I consider the fact the scene is placed as a book opener...
The picture it paints is that things won't go so smoothly between Rand and Egwene for a while yet.
"The Amyrlin's anger" suggests Egwene will be the one pissed off then (and as I said elsewhere, Elaida's foretelling kind of confirms the topic of anger concerns Taim and the BT, and by extension Egwene might link this with previous "disappearances" of sisters, and call Rand to account on this. Rand might tell Egwene the sisters who follow him are doing this by choice, and several have given their oath to follow him, and he might see no reason to grant a request that those sisters be relieved of their oath to return to the Tower).
Then Rand and Egwene appear to have a confrontation coming, this one most likely happening quite later in the game (it's most likely after he's been "dead", as the Land will still be divided by the return after that, meaning it won't yet be "as one", and the Seanchan conflict isn't yet solved by that point...). It seems to suggest Rand and Egwene might have allied then (or Egwene and the Asha'man, anyway), but they won't see eye-to-eye during the Last Battle. The twist there is that it's no longer Egwene who is angry, it's Rand who is confronting not only Egwene, but the women with her, including a Seanchan woman. Interesting that Jordan chose "women", and not "Aes Sedai". As the dream is Egwene's own, she might have said "other sisters" or AS had the women with her been such. It doesn't mean they aren't, but it could be a united front of women Rand confronts there... it could even symbolize the alliance Egwene dreamed of... of Windfinders, WO, Kin, AS. And Seanchan, apparently.
There are still good puzzles ahead... one of them is that dream of Egwene when a female hawk (obviously a Seanchan or a Paendrag... so Tuon or Berelain, most likely Tuon) touches her, and they become tied... A'dam? Warder bond? Purely symbolic? "Tied" and touching seems to speak of more than making an alliance.
The resolution of the Seanchan stuff looks to be dramatic too, which is why it worked so well as a red herring that it was to happen during the attack on the Tower: before the Seanchan woman comes to say that they much help each other, Egwene cannot see beyond the clouds and the ledge on the cliff on which she stands collapses and she hangs by her fingertips. This really doesn't look like the result of negotiations... Egwene will be in a rather desperate position when she has to accept or refuse that she and the Seanchan woman mutually help each other.
There is another dream of Egwene that speaks of problems in forging an alliance of male and female AS: that wall of black and white discs she struggles to climb but that proves insurmountable.
I think it's quite possible Rand and Egwene disagree about the Seanchan. When she learns they refused Rand's truce, Egwene, considering they have Travelling, might disagree they should risk them at their backs (and now able to pop up anywhere) during the LB. Rand might end having to reason Egwene that they cannot join forces to wage war on the Seanchan now, as TG is on the verge of starting, while Egwene argues after the Tower attack they can't afford not to, not when they'll have to fight the Shadow soon. Rand might end up telling Egwene that if she wages war on the Seanchan, he won't help. Of course, the sides could just as easily be reversed, with Egwene refusing to send the Tower to join Rand to fight the Seanchan.
In any case, it sounds possible there's a kind of Latra Posae (coming from Egwene, of from Rand's side) replay before Rand and Egwene finally ally for good in AMOL.
I could see Jordan going this way. Rand has had an epiphany, but that's not enough, and not the end. He's gonna have to work hard to mend the bridges. Things aren't gonna get solved magically because now he wishes the bridges to be mended. He estranged himself, and it probably will take some time and effort before he stops paying for his attitude and his kind of tyranical leadership before his epiphany. It would cheapen his epiphany a lot if just the fact of having it redeemed everything.
This message last edited by DomA on 28/09/2010 at 03:19:07 AM
Jason's review... Looks like DomA was right (Review is now removed)
25/09/2010 05:40:18 AM
- 3424 Views
Re: Jason's review (spoilerish thoughts from me, so BEWARE!). Looks like DomA was right
25/09/2010 06:00:46 AM
- 1249 Views
Everyone seems to think Rand will talk to Egwene, but a male channeler also makes sense
25/09/2010 10:44:18 PM
- 995 Views
No Elayne hopefully, but again it looks like Egwene has everything fall in her lap
25/09/2010 08:10:54 AM
- 1162 Views
No Elayne hopefully, but again it looks like Egwene has everything fall in her lap
25/09/2010 08:11:37 AM
- 886 Views
Perrin will probably gather the wolves...
25/09/2010 09:57:06 AM
- 1068 Views
this "we like it because it's family" stuff is worrisome
25/09/2010 10:18:22 AM
- 1039 Views
After his COT review, a less then gushing review isn't great
25/09/2010 11:42:39 AM
- 980 Views
But he is specifically trying to avoid being overly fanboyish BECAUSE of that CoT review. *NM*
27/09/2010 04:19:21 PM
- 499 Views
Damn, his COT review was infinitely more enthusiastic. What could it all mean? *NM*
25/09/2010 01:06:00 PM
- 515 Views
But his CoT review was also more enthusiastic than his KoD and TGS reviews *NM*
25/09/2010 01:07:15 PM
- 522 Views
Hmm, interesting point. Could a guilty conscience be setting in? *NM*
25/09/2010 01:26:30 PM
- 476 Views
I'm guessing Olver will sacrifice his Snakes and Foxes game his father made for him *NM*
25/09/2010 06:09:10 PM
- 655 Views
I haven't read the review but...
25/09/2010 07:22:48 PM
- 1501 Views
That's not what I meant...
25/09/2010 08:25:42 PM
- 1096 Views
It's odd, I didn't see any reference to Rand descending from DM in his review.
25/09/2010 08:39:33 PM
- 935 Views
It was the very last line...
25/09/2010 08:55:49 PM
- 1036 Views
Re: It was the very last line...
25/09/2010 09:03:14 PM
- 922 Views
Re: It was the very last line...
25/09/2010 10:09:58 PM
- 1170 Views
I blame JordanCon too.
26/09/2010 02:17:50 AM
- 1064 Views
Regarding the WOTFAQ, Tam,
26/09/2010 10:04:40 PM
- 978 Views
Regarding Brandon's messing up of the timelines...
25/09/2010 11:34:06 PM
- 1064 Views
To me it's two different things
26/09/2010 01:48:13 AM
- 1156 Views
I remember the timeline was discussed much at TL prior to TGS release.
26/09/2010 03:04:24 AM
- 991 Views
Re: I remember the timeline was discussed much at TL prior to TGS release.
26/09/2010 08:31:00 PM
- 1076 Views
KOD and TOM show where TGS could have been 'fixed'
26/09/2010 10:27:04 AM
- 959 Views
The review is back up...
27/09/2010 01:59:50 AM
- 936 Views
It wasn't quite identical... It was missing the line about Rand walking down from DM
27/09/2010 06:42:47 AM
- 939 Views
The line about Rand wasn't there when I read the review Saturday morning either. *NM*
27/09/2010 01:57:00 PM
- 428 Views
It was...
27/09/2010 04:22:24 PM
- 793 Views
I must have missed it then. It does fit with Tor's not releasing Chapter 1 early. *NM*
27/09/2010 05:06:36 PM
- 439 Views
What do you mean?
27/09/2010 11:33:15 PM
- 849 Views
I read somewhere that they'd release two different chapters this time. Could well be wrong though. *NM*
28/09/2010 02:15:28 AM
- 460 Views
Olver
27/09/2010 11:34:40 AM
- 1088 Views
doubt he'll die. Jason's review is too much of a spoiler if he actually dies *NM*
27/09/2010 11:46:16 AM
- 478 Views
One problem with the idea of a Rand-Egwene meeting in Chapter 1 beyond timeline issues
27/09/2010 10:29:15 PM
- 871 Views
Not true...
28/09/2010 01:00:40 AM
- 860 Views
Good call. I assumed, and still do, that the two events are one in the same.
28/09/2010 01:10:13 AM
- 939 Views
I don't think so...
28/09/2010 01:47:40 AM
- 788 Views
Re: I don't think so...
28/09/2010 03:07:08 AM
- 1681 Views
Not true indeed... and....
28/09/2010 02:24:00 AM
- 1097 Views