Personally I'm not that fussed about chronology - but I appreciate your point that TGS wasn't in Jordan's style.
To me it's part of the fact that we won't have the books that Jordan would have written - we'll have to live with the next best thing instead.
When BS announced he was splitting the books I was really dubious - I remembered RJ's quote that the book couldn't be split because there would be one long introduction then a crazy amount of action and it wouldn't be balanced. Given the circimstances, I'm not sure BS could have split the story any other way than the way he did without writing a book that would have disappointed most readers. I felt that most of the more minor points of view were necessary to the plot. And the structure of TGS worked with his approach to storytelling which has always been more about pace.
Anyway, after BS has finished the series I'm planning on re-reading the last three books in as close to chronological order (storywise) as I can. I want to see how the books might have been had they been structured the way RJ had planned. Might be a fun thing to plan for 2012?
To me it's part of the fact that we won't have the books that Jordan would have written - we'll have to live with the next best thing instead.
When BS announced he was splitting the books I was really dubious - I remembered RJ's quote that the book couldn't be split because there would be one long introduction then a crazy amount of action and it wouldn't be balanced. Given the circimstances, I'm not sure BS could have split the story any other way than the way he did without writing a book that would have disappointed most readers. I felt that most of the more minor points of view were necessary to the plot. And the structure of TGS worked with his approach to storytelling which has always been more about pace.
Anyway, after BS has finished the series I'm planning on re-reading the last three books in as close to chronological order (storywise) as I can. I want to see how the books might have been had they been structured the way RJ had planned. Might be a fun thing to plan for 2012?
Jason's review... Looks like DomA was right 
(Review is now removed)
- 25/09/2010 05:40:18 AM
3423 Views
(Review is now removed)
- 25/09/2010 05:40:18 AM
3423 Views
Re: Jason's review (spoilerish thoughts from me, so BEWARE!). Looks like DomA was right
- 25/09/2010 06:00:46 AM
1248 Views
- 25/09/2010 06:00:46 AM
1248 Views
Everyone seems to think Rand will talk to Egwene, but a male channeler also makes sense
- 25/09/2010 10:44:18 PM
994 Views
No Elayne hopefully, but again it looks like Egwene has everything fall in her lap
- 25/09/2010 08:10:54 AM
1161 Views
- 25/09/2010 08:10:54 AM
1161 Views
No Elayne hopefully, but again it looks like Egwene has everything fall in her lap
- 25/09/2010 08:11:37 AM
886 Views
- 25/09/2010 08:11:37 AM
886 Views
Perrin will probably gather the wolves...
- 25/09/2010 09:57:06 AM
1067 Views
this "we like it because it's family" stuff is worrisome
- 25/09/2010 10:18:22 AM
1039 Views
After his COT review, a less then gushing review isn't great
- 25/09/2010 11:42:39 AM
979 Views
But he is specifically trying to avoid being overly fanboyish BECAUSE of that CoT review. *NM*
- 27/09/2010 04:19:21 PM
498 Views
Damn, his COT review was infinitely more enthusiastic. What could it all mean? *NM*
- 25/09/2010 01:06:00 PM
515 Views
But his CoT review was also more enthusiastic than his KoD and TGS reviews *NM*
- 25/09/2010 01:07:15 PM
521 Views
Hmm, interesting point. Could a guilty conscience be setting in? *NM*
- 25/09/2010 01:26:30 PM
476 Views
I'm guessing Olver will sacrifice his Snakes and Foxes game his father made for him *NM*
- 25/09/2010 06:09:10 PM
655 Views
I haven't read the review but...
- 25/09/2010 07:22:48 PM
1499 Views
That's not what I meant...
- 25/09/2010 08:25:42 PM
1096 Views
It's odd, I didn't see any reference to Rand descending from DM in his review.
- 25/09/2010 08:39:33 PM
935 Views
It was the very last line...
- 25/09/2010 08:55:49 PM
1035 Views
Re: It was the very last line...
- 25/09/2010 09:03:14 PM
922 Views
Re: It was the very last line...
- 25/09/2010 10:09:58 PM
1169 Views
I blame JordanCon too.
- 26/09/2010 02:17:50 AM
1062 Views
Regarding the WOTFAQ, Tam,
- 26/09/2010 10:04:40 PM
977 Views
Regarding Brandon's messing up of the timelines...
- 25/09/2010 11:34:06 PM
1063 Views
To me it's two different things
- 26/09/2010 01:48:13 AM
1154 Views
I remember the timeline was discussed much at TL prior to TGS release.
- 26/09/2010 03:04:24 AM
991 Views
Re: I remember the timeline was discussed much at TL prior to TGS release.
- 26/09/2010 08:31:00 PM
1074 Views
KOD and TOM show where TGS could have been 'fixed'
- 26/09/2010 10:27:04 AM
959 Views
A suggestion?
- 26/09/2010 11:39:08 AM
1089 Views
The review is back up...
- 27/09/2010 01:59:50 AM
935 Views
It wasn't quite identical... It was missing the line about Rand walking down from DM
- 27/09/2010 06:42:47 AM
938 Views
The line about Rand wasn't there when I read the review Saturday morning either. *NM*
- 27/09/2010 01:57:00 PM
428 Views
It was...
- 27/09/2010 04:22:24 PM
792 Views
I must have missed it then. It does fit with Tor's not releasing Chapter 1 early. *NM*
- 27/09/2010 05:06:36 PM
439 Views
What do you mean?
- 27/09/2010 11:33:15 PM
848 Views
I read somewhere that they'd release two different chapters this time. Could well be wrong though. *NM*
- 28/09/2010 02:15:28 AM
460 Views
Olver
- 27/09/2010 11:34:40 AM
1088 Views
doubt he'll die. Jason's review is too much of a spoiler if he actually dies *NM*
- 27/09/2010 11:46:16 AM
478 Views
One problem with the idea of a Rand-Egwene meeting in Chapter 1 beyond timeline issues
- 27/09/2010 10:29:15 PM
870 Views
Not true...
- 28/09/2010 01:00:40 AM
859 Views
Good call. I assumed, and still do, that the two events are one in the same.
- 28/09/2010 01:10:13 AM
938 Views
Not true indeed... and....
- 28/09/2010 02:24:00 AM
1096 Views