Active Users:365 Time:04/04/2025 12:04:57 AM
No, He's giving me way more than I want. NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
I understand how omniscient voice works. What I DON'T want from that writing voice is editorializing. I have no need of and don't want to know how the narrator feels about anyone's thoughts. All I want is the pure thought. This is along the same lines as learning that the narrator thinks that a particular thought from say Elayne is slutty, or one from Nynaeve is timid or whatever. Bad bad writing. An omniscient narrator should do ONLY narration, no commenting, editorializing or any other 3rd party stuff. I really don't care and really really really don't want to know what the narrator thinks, only what the characters think. Interpretation should be left to the reader, and reader alone.

NaCl(climbs down from the soapbox )H2O +<img class=' />

edit: eliminated the stupid mo smiley
This message last edited by NaClH2O on 09/09/2009 at 05:29:11 PM
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1258 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 733 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 766 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 679 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 675 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 735 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 724 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 683 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 657 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 708 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 808 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 684 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 652 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 616 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 696 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 618 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 582 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 671 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 807 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 744 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 669 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 664 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 678 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 632 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 614 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1121 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 697 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 648 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 601 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 648 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 614 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 718 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 689 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 656 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 633 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 640 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 604 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 679 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 734 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 718 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 647 Views

Reply to Message