Active Users:922 Time:15/11/2024 08:15:13 AM
No, He's giving me way more than I want. NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
I understand how omniscient voice works. What I DON'T want from that writing voice is editorializing. I have no need of and don't want to know how the narrator feels about anyone's thoughts. All I want is the pure thought. This is along the same lines as learning that the narrator thinks that a particular thought from say Elayne is slutty, or one from Nynaeve is timid or whatever. Bad bad writing. An omniscient narrator should do ONLY narration, no commenting, editorializing or any other 3rd party stuff. I really don't care and really really really don't want to know what the narrator thinks, only what the characters think. Interpretation should be left to the reader, and reader alone.

NaCl(climbs down from the soapbox )H2O +<img class=' />

edit: eliminated the stupid mo smiley
This message last edited by NaClH2O on 09/09/2009 at 05:29:11 PM
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1168 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 651 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 669 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 586 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 588 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 648 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 643 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 596 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 567 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 618 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 717 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 597 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 555 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 527 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 636 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 529 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 505 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 587 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 723 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 650 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 588 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 575 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 588 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 540 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 529 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1029 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 613 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 567 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 517 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 569 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 531 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 619 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 603 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 568 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 546 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 556 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 522 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 597 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 646 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 629 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 563 Views

Reply to Message