Active Users:326 Time:10/04/2025 11:03:16 PM
No, He's giving me way more than I want. NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
I understand how omniscient voice works. What I DON'T want from that writing voice is editorializing. I have no need of and don't want to know how the narrator feels about anyone's thoughts. All I want is the pure thought. This is along the same lines as learning that the narrator thinks that a particular thought from say Elayne is slutty, or one from Nynaeve is timid or whatever. Bad bad writing. An omniscient narrator should do ONLY narration, no commenting, editorializing or any other 3rd party stuff. I really don't care and really really really don't want to know what the narrator thinks, only what the characters think. Interpretation should be left to the reader, and reader alone.

NaCl(climbs down from the soapbox )H2O +<img class=' />

edit: eliminated the stupid mo smiley
This message last edited by NaClH2O on 09/09/2009 at 05:29:11 PM
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1261 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 737 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 769 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 682 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 677 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 738 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 726 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 683 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 659 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 714 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 813 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 689 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 656 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 620 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 698 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 620 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 584 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 673 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 809 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 746 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 671 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 666 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 681 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 634 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 617 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1124 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 702 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 650 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 603 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 650 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 616 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 721 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 690 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 660 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 636 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 642 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 607 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 682 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 736 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 720 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 650 Views

Reply to Message