I think Brandon hinted that there is a way to defeat the Rod itself, not the whole Aes Sedai process around taking the Oath.
For some months now I have the following theory:
- to swear the Oath again, the Aes Sedai are un-swearing them;
- since Mesaana didn't swear any Oath, we actually don't know what happens when you are un-swearing them while never swearing in the first place;
- my theory is that such process creates a Oath-negative effect for the channeler, and when the channeler actually swears the Oath, its effect is cancelled by the Oath-negative effect;
- this may actually be tied to the physics of the Rod and so Brandon's words hold true.
For some months now I have the following theory:
- to swear the Oath again, the Aes Sedai are un-swearing them;
- since Mesaana didn't swear any Oath, we actually don't know what happens when you are un-swearing them while never swearing in the first place;
- my theory is that such process creates a Oath-negative effect for the channeler, and when the channeler actually swears the Oath, its effect is cancelled by the Oath-negative effect;
- this may actually be tied to the physics of the Rod and so Brandon's words hold true.
I'm not sure it would work though. Unless she knew specifically how to word her pretend unbinding to set up a negative Oath effect.
"And it breaks my heart to look around, and see the unimpressed; who can't believe the emperor is dressed"~Fastball
2-7-1
2-7-1
This message last edited by Gher on 18/07/2010 at 02:01:41 AM
How did Mesaana beat the Oath Rod?
- 17/07/2010 10:26:42 AM
3635 Views
That isn't tricking the oath rod, the way I'm understanding his answer. That's tricking humans *NM*
- 17/07/2010 10:29:52 AM
402 Views
I don't think
- 17/07/2010 05:29:59 PM
1138 Views
As mentioned above, your theory is not about defeating Oath Rod.
- 17/07/2010 06:42:38 PM
875 Views
That's an interesting theory
- 18/07/2010 02:01:23 AM
864 Views
Re: As mentioned above, your theory is not about defeating Oath Rod.
- 20/07/2010 02:02:05 PM
778 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't
- 20/07/2010 04:04:28 PM
985 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't
- 20/07/2010 06:02:40 PM
758 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't
- 20/07/2010 07:26:20 PM
743 Views
I think this is a tricky issue
- 18/07/2010 05:50:50 PM
873 Views
Re: I think this is a tricky issue
- 18/07/2010 07:28:51 PM
896 Views
Perhaps she pressed, and held the on/off switch, so that the Oaths never triggered? *NM*
- 19/07/2010 09:50:13 PM
382 Views
Or she didn't swear on it, because she's a servant.
- 18/07/2010 11:05:08 PM
828 Views
but BS would not have told us to think about defeating the oath rod then....
- 19/07/2010 04:10:56 PM
662 Views
What about the True Power?
- 19/07/2010 06:30:57 AM
794 Views
A true power invisible glove is better than a one power invisible glove. *NM*
- 20/07/2010 07:46:48 PM
386 Views
I doubt Mesaana stands high enough to have TP access right now. She's probably the lowest FS. *NM*
- 20/07/2010 07:55:31 PM
379 Views
Yeah I realize what I presented was kinda the opposite of what I was going for.
- 20/07/2010 02:15:46 AM
745 Views
I just thought of the most obvious way around it.
- 20/07/2010 06:17:34 PM
806 Views
Wouldn't work
- 20/07/2010 08:03:52 PM
732 Views
I agree, but...
- 20/07/2010 08:20:33 PM
821 Views
This makes me wonder what would happen to a woman in a Link
- 20/07/2010 08:37:12 PM
720 Views
Re: Wouldn't work
- 20/07/2010 09:11:50 PM
1094 Views
I think the OR is tied to a channelers connection to the OP and nothing else
- 20/07/2010 09:22:51 PM
732 Views
Re: I think the OR is tied to a channelers connection to the OP and nothing else
- 20/07/2010 09:44:12 PM
796 Views
Off-topic question:
- 21/07/2010 09:07:12 PM
647 Views
I'm fairly certain that the ability can't be sensed until they are very close to touching
- 21/07/2010 09:29:54 PM
714 Views