Active Users:1120 Time:22/11/2024 02:12:03 PM
Oh, I don't believe she plagiarised it. Werthead Send a noteboard - 23/04/2012 10:16:34 PM
BR was a lot more obscure in the USA than Europe (we got a DVD release and it became a cult success almost immediately, whilst the USA had to wait quite a few years, making the timing dubious) so I actually believe her when she says she didn't steal the idea from BR. I believe she actually said she used THE RUNNING MAN (much more familiar to American audiences) as inspiration but mixed it in with American reality television.

So I don't agree with that part of Tom's argument. What I was referring to (my title was unclear, apologies) was the suggestion that it was simply better.
Reply to message
Hunger Games vs. Battle Royale - 23/04/2012 02:11:03 AM 1068 Views
I don't wanna defend HG all that much... - 23/04/2012 08:44:00 AM 752 Views
This - 23/04/2012 03:41:17 PM 746 Views
Agree with all of this as well. *NM* - 23/04/2012 10:07:21 PM 332 Views
That premise is the equivalent of public domain - it's so unoriginal you can't call plagiarism - 23/04/2012 03:40:26 PM 915 Views
You're such a fucking idiot. *NM* - 23/04/2012 04:22:47 PM 364 Views
*NM* - 23/04/2012 05:14:55 PM 300 Views
In this case, the suggestion is justified (at least with the books) - 23/04/2012 06:03:08 PM 776 Views
Superiority is not evidence of plagiarism (and arguably more evident of the opposite) - 23/04/2012 07:15:35 PM 678 Views
Oh, I don't believe she plagiarised it. - 23/04/2012 10:16:34 PM 736 Views
Is it really fair to compare the two books of BR to the first book of THG alone? - 23/04/2012 09:22:18 PM 747 Views
There's only one BATTLE ROYALE novel. - 23/04/2012 10:18:27 PM 676 Views
Me likey both - 23/04/2012 09:33:16 PM 733 Views
Re: Hunger Games vs. Battle Royale - 23/04/2012 11:22:34 PM 675 Views
I posit: THG raised awareness of Battle Royale - 25/04/2012 08:22:16 PM 753 Views
My only comment is: - 27/04/2012 10:10:49 AM 1124 Views
i don't understand this hunger games stuff - 01/05/2012 10:22:04 PM 884 Views

Reply to Message