Now women in action that I'm familiar with:
Xena: probably the best example of a non frail looking woman in a lead action role. However, her outfit probably made her look bigger but thats beside the point, its the overall impression that matters.
Buffy: extremely frail looking. That was part of the story that a slayer can look frail but be magically strong but even so her thinness and extreme (apparent) frailty was at times distracting.
Nikita (current version): Inititally I thought she looked thin and frail but Maggie Q has really won me over and I really like her a lot.
I've never been one who considers women somehow inferior to men. Yes, on average, women are physically weaker than men. That's just nature. Things like this have a purpose in nature. So, with that said, I never understood how anyone could view women as somehow "weaker" than men. Men have no inherent superiority over women. But, generally, the human race has ruled by strength. This probably led to thinking that women were inferior. When this thinking is slowly corrected, which I believe it largely has, it can led to something I call "over-correction." We have perhaps become so vigorous in our attempt to make up for our past that we go overboard. This brings me around to my topic of women in action roles. Namely, that we have given women abilities that they do not possess.
Let me clarify. Have you ever heard of reverse-racism? I believe this is the same concept. In this present culture, we have gone beyond the equilibrium and have actually become somewhat condescending to women. Case in point: I finally got around to watching Captain America (2011) on DVD. There is a scene where new Army recruits have shown up for basic training. In this scene, Hayley Atwell, playing Officer Peggy Carter, cold-cocks this new recruit and lays he out flat, like you see in a dozen war movies depicting basic training. The problem with this scene? Hayley Atwell is all 5'6" and about 110 pounds. She hits this guy with a closed fist and he's knocked out flat. I'm sorry, but this woman has no super powers. Most likely, the guy's head would have turned with the punch and it might have stung. And she would have probably broken her hand.
This got me thinking about all the other action movies I've seen featuring sexy, thin actresses playing action heroes. Can you imagine an typical Hollywood actress getting into a fist fight with a MMA fighter? I don't care how much martial arts training a character has, she would get torn apart by a professional figher. Yet, we constantly see small, thin women beat big, burly fighters in fist fights. Isn't that a little condescending to women? We went from saying that women are inferior creatures to that they can beat us big, bad men in a fist fight. How realistic is that? When I see previews for this new movie called "Haywire," I just have to shake my head.
Again, women are in no way inferior to men, other than basic genetic stuff that nobody has any control over, and vice versa. I know it's just movies and tv shows. It's fantasy, I get it. But I don't like the reasoning behind it. It almost feels like the entertainment industry leaders are winking at the audience. Perhaps they are simply cashing in on the fact that maybe women want to see a movie where a woman kicks ass. Whatever the reason, I think it's pretty condescending. But yeah, that's just me.
Let me clarify. Have you ever heard of reverse-racism? I believe this is the same concept. In this present culture, we have gone beyond the equilibrium and have actually become somewhat condescending to women. Case in point: I finally got around to watching Captain America (2011) on DVD. There is a scene where new Army recruits have shown up for basic training. In this scene, Hayley Atwell, playing Officer Peggy Carter, cold-cocks this new recruit and lays he out flat, like you see in a dozen war movies depicting basic training. The problem with this scene? Hayley Atwell is all 5'6" and about 110 pounds. She hits this guy with a closed fist and he's knocked out flat. I'm sorry, but this woman has no super powers. Most likely, the guy's head would have turned with the punch and it might have stung. And she would have probably broken her hand.
This got me thinking about all the other action movies I've seen featuring sexy, thin actresses playing action heroes. Can you imagine an typical Hollywood actress getting into a fist fight with a MMA fighter? I don't care how much martial arts training a character has, she would get torn apart by a professional figher. Yet, we constantly see small, thin women beat big, burly fighters in fist fights. Isn't that a little condescending to women? We went from saying that women are inferior creatures to that they can beat us big, bad men in a fist fight. How realistic is that? When I see previews for this new movie called "Haywire," I just have to shake my head.
Again, women are in no way inferior to men, other than basic genetic stuff that nobody has any control over, and vice versa. I know it's just movies and tv shows. It's fantasy, I get it. But I don't like the reasoning behind it. It almost feels like the entertainment industry leaders are winking at the audience. Perhaps they are simply cashing in on the fact that maybe women want to see a movie where a woman kicks ass. Whatever the reason, I think it's pretty condescending. But yeah, that's just me.
A thought about women in action roles
17/01/2012 10:42:28 PM
- 1397 Views
The actress in Haywire is a former MMA fighter.
17/01/2012 11:13:03 PM
- 750 Views
How many men did she beat in those fights?
18/01/2012 01:47:04 AM
- 691 Views
Haywire may not be the best example
17/01/2012 11:33:31 PM
- 738 Views
So: Action roles should have bigger women.
18/01/2012 03:29:38 AM
- 760 Views
Actually, Buffy is worse because it implies women need magic to be useful.
18/01/2012 05:34:09 AM
- 757 Views
Joyce comes to mind. And Tara - she hardly ever uses her magic. Oh, and Darla.
18/01/2012 10:58:57 PM
- 647 Views
I really doubt the outfit did much to make Xena look big.
18/01/2012 06:53:59 PM
- 601 Views
Lucy Lawless is pretty much Amazonian.
19/01/2012 09:28:11 AM
- 902 Views
It's true that she's not as tiny as others.
19/01/2012 05:46:59 PM
- 610 Views
"Not as tiny as the others" is about the best you can say for her.
19/01/2012 08:54:03 PM
- 602 Views
Re: A thought about women in action roles
18/01/2012 04:13:27 AM
- 621 Views
Indeed. See for example, any Robin Hood made in the last 20 years. Maid Marian HAS to fight. *NM*
18/01/2012 05:35:19 AM
- 289 Views
Re: A thought about women in action roles
18/01/2012 07:50:28 PM
- 752 Views
She is some kind of super hero in super hero movie, is't she? *NM*
19/01/2012 07:30:50 AM
- 330 Views
I don't think she's technically supposed to have super powers.
19/01/2012 08:58:40 PM
- 615 Views
I thought Sarah Connor in T2: Judgment Day was a realistic portrayal of the action heroine.
20/01/2012 05:57:08 AM
- 609 Views
So did anyone actually see Haywire this weekend?
23/01/2012 02:34:43 PM
- 636 Views
It just depends on how much you're willing to accept.
23/01/2012 04:23:36 PM
- 638 Views
You're nitpicking and drawing an arbitrary line. All action is ridiculously unbelievable. *NM*
24/01/2012 04:53:40 AM
- 347 Views
Maybe. I just feel there's a distinction between "one in a million" and "impossible."
24/01/2012 03:53:35 PM
- 652 Views