Active Users:1221 Time:22/11/2024 03:36:56 PM
Let's look at forecasts Isaac Send a noteboard - 12/01/2011 04:24:46 AM
This, by the way, is the new format for forecasts, a bit longer and more detailed but I felt it was silly to have people calculate this for themselves every time, so averages are included. I also wanted to talk about what can be done with this info. Which we'll do beneath it by section but obviously the first thing is that, with a couple of exception, all the info can be extrapolated from the first table, which is merely a sum of player info. The second table is merely the VP pot portion for each area (planets, income, etc) divided up by the totals of those things. Income and Wealth are merely flipped to be easier to use... your future R2P1 report will include your approximate VP total too, or to be more accurate, your Proportional VP.

Forecast Report
Players 7
VP Pot 2,400
Votes 72
Military 46
Planets 8
Assets 30
Stock 60
Income 39,900
Wealth 87,384

Victory Point Distribution
5.0 VP per Vote
7.8 VP per Legion
30.0 VP per Planet
8.0 VP Per Primary Asset
4.0 VP per Stock
166.3 MS Per VP
364.1 MS per VP

Averages
Avg Votes: 10.3
Avg Military: 6.6
Avg Planets: 1.1
Avg Assets: 4.3
Avg Stock: 8.6
Avg Income: 5,700
Avg Wealth: 12,483

Additional Info
Sum of Attrbiutes 56
Avg Attrib Score 2.7
Avg Combined Score 5.3
Locations in Play 55
Militia Units 10

VP requirements by Rank
Barony 343
Viscount 400
Count 457
Marquis 514
Duke 571
Archduke 629
Prince 686


First, the ranks, as mentioned the player's ultimate goal is to have as much VP as possible at the end of the game. These are broken between 7 ranks distributed between Baron and Prince, this is not a first through seventh place, five players could all score count. Getting a rank is effectively a reflection of how much of your personal goals and the VP Pot you achieved. There are currently 3100 VP in play - 1000 plus 300 per player. of that, 750 plus 150 per player, or 1800 VP, distribute proportionally, with a current average of 257 VP. If you stay average and achieve all your personal goals that would be 337, just a couple points shy of a barony and most players will receive at least a few VP. In other words, stay average and achieve your goals and you'll make Baron... which is a 'win'. If almost every single VP point in play is gained, and evenly distributed, it would be 442, well into Viscount territory - remember, 25% of the VP Pot goes to individual awards like having the most votes or legions or luxuries. If a player joins, or resigns, these numbers shift. Ranks are assigned between Baron and Prince, with Baron being simply the VP pot divided by number of players - in this case 343, and with Prince being double that, at 686, the five in-between ranks are evenly spread between them. This is covered in detail in Winning the Game

So effectively there are 3 prime ways to be victorious. First, that actual majority of votes to become Chancellor. Second, achieving any rank at all is a win, and third, obviously the higher your score, your rank, the better you did.

With that aside complete, let's talk about another new section, reprinted:

Additional Info
Sum of Attributes 56
Avg Attrib Score 2.7
Avg Combined Score 5.3
Locations in Play 55
Militia Units 10

Everyone has an 8 right now, but that will change, and player will know what the total is... this can be handy info since if you see the score is one less than it should be, based on sold schools, someone probably just jumped to a 5, you'll have to keep track of how many school slots sold on your own of course, this merely sums peoples abilities in their chunk of my spreadsheet. The next two are merely that divided by players, and then doubled, there for information purposes, that average should climb to 3 in the next few rounds.

Locations in play requires a note. Whereas Primary Assets keeps track of all the luxuries and standard assets owned by players and planets does the same, this actually lists all the current real locations, not including Katain and a couple NPC worlds that are 'building', it includes any place that can currently be attacked by a player - homeworlds, electors, etc but would not include auction items, it would include those 'unowned' luxuries and assets that got liquidated while they cycle around to return to play. After the extra raids end major NPC's come into play - Great houses or other large groups who aren't trying for Chancellor. We'll have more on this in round 3 and introduce the 'Grudge' rules then. These exist primarily to keep players from going on non-stop re-liquidation crusades or passing a few valuable assets around for 'liquidation farming', e.g. a couple players select two or three things with a high Liquid Value and share them by leaping conquest forces to one each round, liquidating it and leaping to the next while someone else lands on it and does the same, over and over, potential doing this every round, or even multiple times a round. Generally Locations in play will not exceed player owned locations by too much, but it will be greater. Currently, the players control roughly 40 locations - mixed between planets, electors, primary assets, etc.

Militia - much like locations this indicates militia units that are currently assigned somewhere, does not necessarily indicate how many the player's control but in fact, player's control exactly 10 militia at the moment. NPCs won't generally use militia unless the location has them, so if someone has liquidates a place with militia, the NPC owner will have them, though there is no rule preventing NPC originated locations from having militia, I don't expect some pirate base (poor planet for instance) to have militia, just legions.

So a few things for players to consider - and I think, probably to discuss. Nothing requires players to ever say a single thing in the thread besides a minimum "Here" once a round before phase 1 ends - though it is strategically wise in my opinion to start talking more to each other in the thread, and I should note that general activity is a factor in Prestige VP awards. Everyone is very active of course, I have received about 70~80 NB's thus far in the game and would expect that to be fairly normal for rounds, I would suggest trying to post at least as much text into the game as you NB me :P
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
This message last edited by Isaac on 12/01/2011 at 04:25:35 AM
Reply to message
Dune: Round 2 - 11/01/2011 03:33:07 AM 1228 Views
Crisis - 11/01/2011 03:33:39 AM 772 Views
Forecast - 11/01/2011 03:34:03 AM 744 Views
Auction Log and Results - 11/01/2011 03:34:21 AM 963 Views
Player Vote Tracker - 11/01/2011 03:34:38 AM 800 Views
Votes! Grand Ball and Chancellor's Challenge have been passed - 11/01/2011 05:06:36 PM 862 Views
Pirate Vote Tracker - 13/01/2011 07:41:42 PM 672 Views
Court Gossip Log - 11/01/2011 03:35:11 AM 921 Views
Incidentally... - 12/01/2011 05:50:01 AM 908 Views
CHOAM Auction Round 2 Phase 1 - 11/01/2011 03:35:53 AM 901 Views
E2B - Agricultural Fief - 1 Militia (Min Bid 2000 MS, Inc 50 MS) - 11/01/2011 04:17:53 AM 869 Views
2000 MS - Edited because of mistype, read 200 MS originally. *NM* - 11/01/2011 11:33:08 PM 616 Views
2050 MS *NM* - 13/01/2011 01:58:12 AM 377 Views
2100 MS *NM* - 13/01/2011 11:38:52 AM 467 Views
EDIT: 2100 MS - Invalid bid, my stupidity - 13/01/2011 11:43:24 AM 750 Views
Wait, what is 9 PM EST time in GMT +2? this one closed before my second bid, right? *NM* - 13/01/2011 11:40:26 AM 398 Views
I checked it. thats 4 AM my time. - 13/01/2011 11:42:50 AM 695 Views
Ouch - 13/01/2011 12:17:33 PM 702 Views
Too bad we don't have a chat room- that'd be perfect for outcry *NM* - 13/01/2011 04:47:34 PM 873 Views
Rich Planet - Parmentier, Min Bid 3000 MS, 50 MS increment - 11/01/2011 04:20:34 AM 925 Views
3000 MS *NM* - 11/01/2011 02:26:00 PM 441 Views
3100 MS *NM* - 11/01/2011 03:13:03 PM 421 Views
3300 MS *NM* - 11/01/2011 04:00:49 PM 486 Views
3350 MS *NM* - 11/01/2011 10:58:22 PM 426 Views
3400 MS *NM* - 11/01/2011 11:30:49 PM 496 Views
3450 MS *NM* - 12/01/2011 12:50:32 AM 494 Views
Pah, minimum bids. 3600 MS *NM* - 12/01/2011 02:28:44 AM 508 Views
They're pretty abitrary for non-LiqVal items *NM* - 12/01/2011 02:56:49 AM 447 Views
I think he was just Pahing the fact that we're bidding the minimum increments *NM* - 12/01/2011 02:34:42 PM 496 Views
Quite probably - this seems a good point to mentioning Horizontal scroll in bidding wars - 12/01/2011 02:59:56 PM 701 Views
But I like horizontal scroll! *NM* - 12/01/2011 03:13:41 PM 456 Views
Exactly. I'm trying to destroy the status quo. - 13/01/2011 06:06:18 AM 731 Views
3650 MS *NM* - 12/01/2011 07:47:15 AM 500 Views
3700 MS *NM* - 12/01/2011 02:33:41 PM 437 Views
3750 MS *NM* - 12/01/2011 04:23:05 PM 458 Views
3850 MS *NM* - 12/01/2011 07:04:46 PM 413 Views
3900 MS *NM* - 13/01/2011 01:57:57 AM 375 Views
Cut that out! 4400 MS! *NM* - 13/01/2011 06:17:52 AM 365 Views
I'm tempted to offer 4450... But not now. - 13/01/2011 11:35:00 AM 781 Views
I will though. 4450 MS. *NM* - 13/01/2011 02:18:03 PM 469 Views
4500 MS *NM* - 13/01/2011 04:04:46 PM 390 Views
HZ scroll - last bid 4500 *NM* - 13/01/2011 06:29:59 PM 476 Views
4550 MS *NM* - 14/01/2011 11:46:43 PM 467 Views
Round 1 Phase 1 has begun - 11/01/2011 04:57:21 AM 757 Views
Let's look at forecasts - 12/01/2011 04:24:46 AM 1086 Views
Court Gossip - 11/01/2011 05:40:30 AM 813 Views
Vote: Hold Grand Ball *NM* - 11/01/2011 02:27:56 PM 435 Views
Vote: Hold Grand Ball *NM* - 11/01/2011 04:09:16 PM 472 Views
Vote: Hold Grand Ball *NM* - 11/01/2011 05:05:51 PM 465 Views
Vote: Hold Grand Ball *NM* - 11/01/2011 11:32:35 PM 465 Views
Hmmm. Debate? - 11/01/2011 05:20:59 PM 725 Views
Yeaah - 11/01/2011 05:47:12 PM 791 Views
Re: Yeaah - 11/01/2011 06:23:44 PM 788 Views
Well, as for the Crisis- is everyone pretty firm in what they're voting for? Dunno if I am - 12/01/2011 05:45:11 AM 707 Views
Well I wouldn't mind listening to some persuasive arguments, if anybody has some to offer. - 12/01/2011 05:51:48 AM 757 Views
This crisis is a no-brainer. - 12/01/2011 03:12:21 PM 752 Views
Good analysis. - 12/01/2011 04:06:20 PM 697 Views
Court Gossip - Chancellor’s Challenge - 12/01/2011 09:20:43 AM 1118 Views
Vote: Accept Chancellor’s Challenge *NM* - 12/01/2011 02:31:59 PM 454 Views
Vote: Accept Challenge *NM* - 12/01/2011 04:06:51 PM 391 Views
Vote: Accept Chancellor's Challenge. (Erm...?) - 12/01/2011 05:46:38 PM 748 Views
I was attacked by the Bandits of Surewood Forest - 12/01/2011 07:08:16 PM 763 Views
I think "pirates" just means "NPC raiders" - 12/01/2011 07:35:04 PM 653 Views
According to Court Gossip, it would be the Brigands of Bendar - 12/01/2011 09:45:36 PM 758 Views
I was attacked by the Brigands of Bendar last night. - 13/01/2011 07:17:27 PM 687 Views
Vote: Accept Chancellor's Challenge. *NM* - 12/01/2011 07:05:23 PM 494 Views
Vote: Accept Challenge *NM* - 12/01/2011 08:08:48 PM 454 Views
Pirate Name: Pirates of Carib Ion Sea *NM* - 12/01/2011 09:51:25 PM 425 Views
(Others should do this, too) - 13/01/2011 07:31:09 AM 684 Views
I thought that as Adjutant General you could simply report our conclusions. *NM* - 14/01/2011 06:02:38 AM 433 Views
4 players have to "confirm" the names HINT HINT - 14/01/2011 08:21:23 AM 626 Views
Yeah, I did so below. I was explaining why I didn't do so earlier. *NM* - 14/01/2011 07:15:00 PM 465 Views
"Pirate Name: Pirates of Carib Ion Sea" Yes, 4 of you have to do this for each pirate group *NM* - 14/01/2011 04:05:29 AM 393 Views
Pirate Name: Pirates of Carib Ion Sea *NM* - 14/01/2011 05:33:45 AM 430 Views
Pirate Name: Bandits of Surewood Forest *NM* - 14/01/2011 05:34:11 AM 397 Views
Pirate Name: Brigands of Bendar *NM* - 14/01/2011 05:34:38 AM 445 Views
Pirate Name: Brigands of Bendar *NM* - 14/01/2011 01:53:23 PM 458 Views
Pirate Name: Bandits of Surewood Forest *NM* - 14/01/2011 01:53:03 PM 422 Views
Pirate Name: Pirates of Carib Ion Sea *NM* - 14/01/2011 01:52:43 PM 421 Views
Pirate Name: Pirates of Carib Ion Sea - 14/01/2011 06:47:25 PM 701 Views
I think that makes 4 of us for every name. - 15/01/2011 12:02:20 AM 749 Views
Oh, he already has. Nevermind then. - 15/01/2011 12:03:30 AM 903 Views
CHOAM Auction Round 2 Phase 1 - 13/01/2011 02:13:36 AM 847 Views
All reports out now - 13/01/2011 03:08:33 AM 668 Views
Court Gossip - 13/01/2011 04:18:26 AM 681 Views
About bidding - 13/01/2011 01:03:40 PM 899 Views
Pirate Name: Brigands of Bendar *NM* - 13/01/2011 07:40:53 PM 480 Views
Pirate Name: Bandits of Surewood Forest *NM* - 14/01/2011 05:48:23 AM 443 Views
Battle Plans - 14/01/2011 02:44:01 PM 718 Views
As for the money... (and a couple other things) - 14/01/2011 06:05:04 PM 745 Views
I agree with this arrangement. *NM* - 14/01/2011 07:14:16 PM 553 Views
Weird. I thought I replied to this. Hm. Anyway, I could attack one of the pirate Strongholds. *NM* - 14/01/2011 08:17:00 PM 432 Views
Cool. I can get another one. *NM* - 14/01/2011 09:42:53 PM 450 Views
I'll get the third. *NM* - 14/01/2011 10:32:02 PM 398 Views
So yeah, we need 3 volunteers with decent Diplomacy/Intrigue stats - 14/01/2011 09:43:58 PM 704 Views
As stated above, I will be one of them - 15/01/2011 12:54:44 AM 760 Views
So is anyone else investigating pirates? - 16/01/2011 02:28:06 AM 780 Views
I guess I could do one. *NM* - 16/01/2011 02:43:05 AM 431 Views
Which group do you want? - 16/01/2011 04:41:04 AM 705 Views
Late Auction Results - 15/01/2011 02:26:03 AM 783 Views
Looming Crises - Round Ends 9 PM EST Sunday - 15/01/2011 02:27:48 AM 865 Views
Some More Notes - 15/01/2011 03:47:59 AM 705 Views
I'd be all for condensing it into one auction phase - 15/01/2011 04:07:56 AM 771 Views
It'd be fairer for players like Bergioyn who aren't present near the deadline though. - 15/01/2011 04:18:19 AM 750 Views
I think a better solution would be to randomize the deadlines - 15/01/2011 04:47:43 AM 732 Views
That's true enough. *NM* - 15/01/2011 04:56:09 AM 396 Views
That's a possibility - 15/01/2011 05:32:55 AM 678 Views
Hm... - 15/01/2011 07:13:06 AM 782 Views
Okay, expected changes - 15/01/2011 05:29:31 AM 811 Views
Probably a short delay on processing - 16/01/2011 10:37:39 PM 671 Views

Reply to Message