I'm anticipating a bit of a mess on first use of this, since its more complicated then Hypocopping and that was a mess the first couple times too, so a quick reminder before we move into reveal phase. That code you give, something between half a dozen and 30 characters long, needs to have a key of a credible and singular nature, and that code needs to have your role name, or a very unambiguous equivalent, in it. This is going to be a mass roleclaim, designed for effective simultaneous reveal, if you try to escape that by being vague or misleading, you'll probably be lynched. So, if your code breaks down to "Roled" or "Investigator" or "Cocktail" etc, I highly suggests you redo it before anyone reveals their role.
Code posted (Chronological)
Isaac - IPUFODTUDKQRWTRIONEFOR
Ranagrande - k ? ? ) é + k é ½ ; ) ( A 1
Beetnemesis - WBRDCXRPOFTWCFCAHPYMINO
Yunalesca - YIMIFPOOFYMOSATFAJ
Kronin al'Sulc - LUGOVO?DS and CKAQONPIHOPX
Kylia Skydancer - VRIOFXMILMRZ
Fox and Ravens - 6C10565/6865846567747972
? - JHCKB95.D9F1H5 and A1MA1AAM-JHCKB95.D9F1H5
White Flame of Tar Valon - pM80tIJ1
Napoleon62 - Vanilla
.
.
.
Incidentally the last of the un-posted can go ahead and directly roleclaim, no code is needed and as this happens to be a list of our less frequent posters, I think I speak for everyone when saying we've no desire for further delay. Once the RCing begins, we're roughly proceeding backwards, but don't wait until its exactly your turn, or we'll get bogged down, don't try to be the last to reveal or delay, don't discuss other people's claims until you've decoded your own, frankly, try not to discuss them at all until everyone is done, we are waiting to reveal until everyone has their's in, even if that means a bit of delay.
Code Decryption -
Remember, your code must be decrypted, and please don't don't give a key or a hint and leave it at that from laziness or challenge. Don't just state your role either. The point of this exercise is to roleclaim so as to prove your roleclaim was made without prior knowledge of anyone else's. Sorry to keep banging the drum on this, but I want to avoid mistakes and I also want the noose firmly established and draped so no one can escape by claiming uncertainty, if you're not sure what we're doing, you need to say so before people start claiming. If you've made more than one code, you'll need to decrypt all of them, not just the most recent. And you need to step through your method, you can go forwards or backwards, whichever works for you, but you need to walk through it, and you should mention any hints or clues to the key you put in your message. This is unlikely to be a brief message, so to speed things up I strongly advise you prepare it in advance, I sent mine off as a NB to FT right after I encrypted it, so all I should need to do copy and paste, you probably should consider something similiar.
Claims and Decrypts
Napoleon62
Hasn't Decrypted Yet
Beetnemesis
Fox and Ravens
Isaac
Kronin al'Sulc
Kylia Skydancer
Ranagrande
White Flame of Tar Valon
Yunalesca
?
Code posted (Chronological)
Isaac - IPUFODTUDKQRWTRIONEFOR
Ranagrande - k ? ? ) é + k é ½ ; ) ( A 1
Beetnemesis - WBRDCXRPOFTWCFCAHPYMINO
Yunalesca - YIMIFPOOFYMOSATFAJ
Kronin al'Sulc - LUGOVO?DS and CKAQONPIHOPX
Kylia Skydancer - VRIOFXMILMRZ
Fox and Ravens - 6C10565/6865846567747972
? - JHCKB95.D9F1H5 and A1MA1AAM-JHCKB95.D9F1H5
White Flame of Tar Valon - pM80tIJ1
Napoleon62 - Vanilla
.
.
.
Incidentally the last of the un-posted can go ahead and directly roleclaim, no code is needed and as this happens to be a list of our less frequent posters, I think I speak for everyone when saying we've no desire for further delay. Once the RCing begins, we're roughly proceeding backwards, but don't wait until its exactly your turn, or we'll get bogged down, don't try to be the last to reveal or delay, don't discuss other people's claims until you've decoded your own, frankly, try not to discuss them at all until everyone is done, we are waiting to reveal until everyone has their's in, even if that means a bit of delay.
Code Decryption -
Remember, your code must be decrypted, and please don't don't give a key or a hint and leave it at that from laziness or challenge. Don't just state your role either. The point of this exercise is to roleclaim so as to prove your roleclaim was made without prior knowledge of anyone else's. Sorry to keep banging the drum on this, but I want to avoid mistakes and I also want the noose firmly established and draped so no one can escape by claiming uncertainty, if you're not sure what we're doing, you need to say so before people start claiming. If you've made more than one code, you'll need to decrypt all of them, not just the most recent. And you need to step through your method, you can go forwards or backwards, whichever works for you, but you need to walk through it, and you should mention any hints or clues to the key you put in your message. This is unlikely to be a brief message, so to speed things up I strongly advise you prepare it in advance, I sent mine off as a NB to FT right after I encrypted it, so all I should need to do copy and paste, you probably should consider something similiar.
Claims and Decrypts
Napoleon62
Hasn't Decrypted Yet
Beetnemesis
Fox and Ravens
Isaac
Kronin al'Sulc
Kylia Skydancer
Ranagrande
White Flame of Tar Valon
Yunalesca
?
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
This message last edited by Isaac on 23/09/2010 at 09:02:22 PM
RAFO Mafia 18 - Day 2: Mystery on the High Seas
15/09/2010 05:39:03 AM
- 1775 Views
ARRRRRRR *NM*
15/09/2010 06:44:52 AM
- 572 Views
Omg. This reply cracked me up so bad.
15/09/2010 12:34:38 PM
- 943 Views
Arrrgggh
15/09/2010 12:50:18 PM
- 912 Views

Re: Arrrgggh
15/09/2010 01:29:15 PM
- 990 Views

plus...
15/09/2010 01:50:44 PM
- 877 Views
Voting Record
18/09/2010 05:41:39 AM
- 886 Views
Moving along
15/09/2010 02:47:27 PM
- 1129 Views
knife hand? *confused* *NM*
15/09/2010 10:25:01 PM
- 502 Views
Re: RAFO Mafia 18 - Day 2: Mystery on the High Seas
15/09/2010 04:06:10 PM
- 932 Views
Re: RAFO Mafia 18 - Day 2: Mystery on the High Seas
15/09/2010 06:23:19 PM
- 1025 Views
my current suspects
15/09/2010 09:52:52 PM
- 1032 Views
How is that a tactic? *NM*
15/09/2010 10:21:04 PM
- 524 Views
Day 2 EVENT: In High Spirits
18/09/2010 04:53:47 AM
- 978 Views
I think 'Aye' is probably the best choice, Vote: Aye
18/09/2010 05:24:24 AM
- 800 Views
I can
18/09/2010 05:35:29 AM
- 899 Views
Nay
18/09/2010 05:25:57 AM
- 940 Views
Any debate? Anyone in favor of Nay?
18/09/2010 07:53:56 AM
- 940 Views
We need to come up with a plan
19/09/2010 05:59:26 AM
- 919 Views
Well, here's who voted for BA:
19/09/2010 08:04:26 AM
- 899 Views
? is the logical target
19/09/2010 08:56:53 AM
- 889 Views
Re: ? is the logical target
20/09/2010 02:10:49 AM
- 919 Views
Re: ? is the logical target
20/09/2010 03:14:22 AM
- 869 Views
Who are your candidates for lynch?
20/09/2010 03:58:04 AM
- 908 Views
I don't have any. Especially after my fail of a push for BA
20/09/2010 04:35:23 AM
- 852 Views
I think I have a plan
20/09/2010 06:33:29 AM
- 1038 Views
...erm...
20/09/2010 07:37:16 AM
- 1010 Views
Crypto tricks
20/09/2010 10:13:23 AM
- 948 Views
Some thoughts...
19/09/2010 01:21:56 PM
- 816 Views
this is the first time its happened while i've been playing atleast
19/09/2010 04:52:13 PM
- 849 Views
It looks like we're proceeding with the plan so a few reminders
20/09/2010 06:35:21 PM
- 978 Views
Hmm. I don't think I did this exactly how you wanted, with the key and whatnot.
20/09/2010 06:41:22 PM
- 917 Views
Re: Hmm. I don't think I did this exactly how you wanted, with the key and whatnot.
20/09/2010 07:13:22 PM
- 889 Views
Re: Hmm. I don't think I did this exactly how you wanted, with the key and whatnot.
21/09/2010 12:04:49 AM
- 860 Views
So if I'm understanding this properly...
21/09/2010 01:38:34 AM
- 868 Views
That is correct. *NM*
21/09/2010 01:44:37 AM
- 527 Views
im still not clear on the key thing.
21/09/2010 04:38:53 PM
- 881 Views
Okay
21/09/2010 05:28:23 PM
- 901 Views
Re: Okay
21/09/2010 07:43:39 PM
- 855 Views
You wanted to hint at it, not say it..... *NM*
21/09/2010 07:46:10 PM
- 531 Views
horsefeathers
21/09/2010 07:55:44 PM
- 834 Views

It's alright. So long as no one actually tries to decode it. :/ *NM*
21/09/2010 08:00:17 PM
- 542 Views
I'm glad I'm dead so I don't have to bother with this.
*NM*
21/09/2010 11:28:46 PM
- 486 Views

List of Codes and Roleclaims (Table)
21/09/2010 11:25:37 AM
- 1019 Views
So I shouldn't code my Role now? *NM*
21/09/2010 01:45:10 PM
- 477 Views
A couple Questions
21/09/2010 08:53:29 PM
- 878 Views
On this whole decryption thing though...
21/09/2010 10:28:57 PM
- 955 Views
Any idea when we are gonna start decrypting?
22/09/2010 01:44:39 AM
- 863 Views
Wait why does it say and between my codes?
22/09/2010 11:00:51 PM
- 867 Views
what now?
22/09/2010 09:27:09 PM
- 805 Views
Napoleon needs to roleclaim now
22/09/2010 09:51:56 PM
- 936 Views
Arg... REALLY sorry people.
23/09/2010 08:16:00 PM
- 905 Views
You definitely do not get that in eveeeery game
23/09/2010 09:14:46 PM
- 937 Views
Why is that so suspicious?
23/09/2010 10:02:23 PM
- 887 Views
It's suspicious because it's not true
23/09/2010 10:17:43 PM
- 948 Views
Cause people tend to accentuate the negative, they seek to form patterns, and they like exaggerating *NM*
24/09/2010 05:07:13 AM
- 597 Views
Re: You definitely do not get that in eveeeery game
23/09/2010 10:27:31 PM
- 947 Views
Everyone can start decrypting now
23/09/2010 09:01:24 PM
- 905 Views
Ok, I'll go ahead and do mine too
23/09/2010 11:16:29 PM
- 948 Views
I was too lazy to verify beyond oxygen and flourine
24/09/2010 12:45:09 AM
- 951 Views
Re: I was too lazy to verify beyond oxygen and flourine
24/09/2010 02:44:11 AM
- 889 Views
eh, what the heck
24/09/2010 03:04:29 AM
- 789 Views
Just out of curiosity, why do you say townie? RB could just as easily be scum, if not more so. *NM*
24/09/2010 05:13:50 AM
- 538 Views
Just out of curiosity, why do you say townie? RB could just as easily be scum, if not more so. *NM*
24/09/2010 05:13:51 AM
- 408 Views
other factors make me think otherwise
24/09/2010 06:07:31 AM
- 780 Views
right, mine
24/09/2010 10:37:45 AM
- 941 Views
Re: right, mine
24/09/2010 10:43:26 AM
- 887 Views
EPWOP
24/09/2010 10:55:42 AM
- 898 Views
Re: EPWOP
24/09/2010 12:47:47 PM
- 932 Views
Okay, that squares
24/09/2010 01:14:31 PM
- 864 Views
Re: Okay, that squares
24/09/2010 01:22:42 PM
- 942 Views
I was lazy... I used the INTERNET
24/09/2010 06:04:26 AM
- 783 Views
Re: I was lazy... I used the INTERNET
24/09/2010 02:29:29 PM
- 856 Views
While we're waiting on White Flame
25/09/2010 08:59:09 PM
- 998 Views
Re: While we're waiting on White Flame
25/09/2010 10:47:47 PM
- 854 Views
EBWOP
25/09/2010 10:48:31 PM
- 848 Views
It's probably also worth noting
25/09/2010 11:17:19 PM
- 891 Views
Re: While we're waiting on White Flame
26/09/2010 02:47:14 AM
- 924 Views
Vote: Fox and Ravens
26/09/2010 03:15:38 AM
- 964 Views
Eh. The RC's always mess me up
26/09/2010 03:43:54 AM
- 825 Views
Yes, they can be tricky
26/09/2010 04:00:52 AM
- 855 Views
Re: Yes, they can be tricky
26/09/2010 04:33:40 AM
- 914 Views
not to mention...
26/09/2010 04:55:30 AM
- 882 Views
Vote: Fox and Ravens *NM*
26/09/2010 02:31:43 PM
- 556 Views
I mean can we just lynch him without going through the procedure if he'll just give up?
26/09/2010 07:33:38 PM
- 1024 Views

Somebody want to hammer?
26/09/2010 09:02:17 PM
- 912 Views