Active Users:355 Time:18/12/2024 09:30:40 AM
Re: Hm. It doesn't seem like we disagree that much on the 'true partnerships' then. Vodalus Send a noteboard - 10/12/2024 10:46:13 PM

View original postI guess I do see things mostly from an economic perspective, yes. Even on the biggest military issue of all, Taiwan, I get the impression that China is deterred from invading as much or more by the extreme economic damage to the entire world but most of all to themselves which would result from an invasion, than by the actual military deterrence of the US and Taiwan itself.

And Xi wisely let Putin go first to test the waters of irredentism, enabling him to gauge the West’s response. China was supposed to woo Taiwan into a confederacy, a path they were on up until maybe 15 years ago, but the approach nowadays seems to be nothing more sophisticated than knocking Taiwan on the head and dragging her back to a cave to rape her.


View original postRegarding the US goal, that makes more sense than what Trump's goal seems to be and certainly that requires a more multilateral approach, as otherwise the US contributions would just be replaced by those from other countries.

Yeah, I’m fine with putting tariffs on China - all for it, really - but there’s a much better way of doing it than Trump’s plan. Changing the de minimus rules should be done as well. I will say Trump does have a knack for identifying or highlighting certain issues. I just happen to find most of his methods or tactics to deal with said problems counterproductive in the long run. And the inflammatory rhetoric and gratuitous insults don’t help at all. That’s mostly in regard to his foreign relations and trade policies. I kind of gave up on domestic issues a long time ago.


View original postOh absolutely, they're investing all over the place and making many governments indebted to them, but as I said, those are purely transactional relationships without much interest in the partner country's interests. The US and EU aren't exactly angels in their relationships with developing countries either, but they're a lot more accommodating than China.

It cares about Chinese interests, not about Pakistani ones, that's what I said. Nor does it care much about making itself popular among Pakistani citizens. In recent years, people in developing countries have sometimes been talking about how China is willing to invest in their countries without the patronizing attitude of the West, or simply more cheaply than the West - but once those investments have been done and they've spent some time watching how the debts for them cripple their government and China doesn't show the least bit of mercy, that attitude sours quickly. And I do think that things like that would also make a difference if it ever came to military conflict between the US and China and countries had to choose sides.


Hm, to the above I feel like we’re talking past one another a little bit. It seems like you’re applying or projecting a Western mindset on how things work. Or maybe it’s because I’m not. You are treating the general population of a country as the country. My take on things here is that China is working with local and often corrupt elites who are willing partners in offering up good deals to the Chinese, ones they know will fuck over their people and government, and so long as they get their cut they have no qualms about it. In really crude terms, the CCP elite are syndicate bosses, lesser CCP figures and foreign politicians in bed with the CCP are pimps. The general public, whether Chinese or foreign, are simply whores. Whores need only be obedient and productive. That’s not an attitude I hold or condone, mind. It’s merely descriptive. The point being China can get other countries to go along and do things not in their best interest by using leverage and influence. In the Chinese way of thinking, China isn’t just the center of civilization, it’s also the apex of civilization. They have vassals, and vassals should aim to please.


View original postSo if China is really trying to build an alliance, they're really going to need to change their attitude and start working on making friends, rather than just making countries indebted to them. After all, if war breaks out and your would-be allies are mostly tied to you for no better reason than because they owe you money, it gives them all the more reason to defect to the other side and try to get out of repaying the debts...

China is not above demagoguery. It’s using grievance politics to foment anti-Western sentiment pretty much everywhere it invests and in the groupings and forums I listed earlier. It’s gained a fair amount of traction. Recent world events, i.e. Gaza, make it that much easier spread. A lot of this is disseminated in Chinese journalism and opinion articles which are made free to local media in Global South countries.

As to war, I’m not sure it’ll come to that. The Chinese way is generally a subtle and insidious undermining of a foe’s psyche. I could be totally wrong about that, though. There’s no small amount of jingoism running wild on the Chinese internet.

南無阿弥陀仏!
This message last edited by Vodalus on 10/12/2024 at 11:03:16 PM
Reply to message
No Fucks Left to Give Joe tosses Hunter a blanket pardon - 02/12/2024 09:23:33 PM 299 Views
I think if he hadn't said he wouldn't pardon his son, then this would be a non-issue. - 03/12/2024 12:53:15 PM 41 Views
I don't agree with that - it would've been a serious issue still. - 03/12/2024 05:56:18 PM 46 Views
How about this? - 04/12/2024 03:43:52 AM 42 Views
Fully agree. *NM* - 04/12/2024 06:40:15 AM 10 Views
Trump was already going to pardon all the J6 defendants, though. - 04/12/2024 07:18:56 AM 40 Views
Re: Trump was already going to pardon all the J6 defendants, though. - 04/12/2024 02:07:41 PM 38 Views
Ugh, I hate this 'they're all the same' rhetoric. - 04/12/2024 09:22:38 PM 34 Views
I respectfully disagree. - 04/12/2024 11:09:07 PM 36 Views
Seems like we're kind of talking past each other here. - 05/12/2024 11:39:02 PM 31 Views
Trump had quite a few successes in his first term - 06/12/2024 02:45:32 PM 35 Views
You mean his administration and Congress had those successes. - 06/12/2024 10:12:25 PM 44 Views
No, I mean him. *NM* - 07/12/2024 12:38:27 AM 11 Views
Okay, then I guess we're not debating it, as you like. *NM* - 07/12/2024 08:54:03 AM 13 Views
The achievements of the administration are attributed to the President. - 08/12/2024 10:50:43 AM 34 Views
Some people also think the earth is flat. - 08/12/2024 06:29:37 PM 31 Views
Le sigh - 08/12/2024 09:03:01 PM 32 Views
Make up your mind already. - 08/12/2024 10:30:11 PM 30 Views
Re: You mean his administration and Congress had those successes. - 09/12/2024 04:28:58 AM 38 Views
That, and way overpromise on what can actually be achieved by cracking down on China. - 09/12/2024 05:12:49 PM 39 Views
Re: That, and way overpromise on what can actually be achieved by cracking down on China. - 10/12/2024 06:55:27 PM 33 Views
Hm. It doesn't seem like we disagree that much on the 'true partnerships' then. - 10/12/2024 07:52:39 PM 31 Views
Re: Hm. It doesn't seem like we disagree that much on the 'true partnerships' then. - 10/12/2024 10:46:13 PM 32 Views
I mostly agree, with one giant caveat - 05/12/2024 02:56:02 PM 43 Views
Re: I mostly agree, with one giant caveat - 05/12/2024 03:49:00 PM 39 Views
I take a bit of umbrage at that assignment personally - 06/12/2024 12:37:40 AM 38 Views
We've been over this - some of this is true, some is, at a minimum, not proven that I ever saw. - 05/12/2024 11:18:24 PM 36 Views
I know it was factually true - 06/12/2024 12:46:44 AM 41 Views
Sounds like you need to become a whistleblower and go talk to the FBI yourself, then? - 06/12/2024 11:37:00 AM 36 Views
Typically, whistle blower and attorney client privilege are not viewed as compatible. - 06/12/2024 03:57:12 PM 37 Views
I have a clearance - 06/12/2024 05:01:07 PM 39 Views
Re: I have a clearance - 06/12/2024 08:08:50 PM 40 Views
Secret evidence doesn't have to be believed - 07/12/2024 09:31:10 PM 39 Views
Re: Secret evidence doesn't have to be believed - 08/12/2024 03:46:54 PM 33 Views
Seriously? - 06/12/2024 10:28:07 PM 35 Views
Re: Seriously? - 06/12/2024 11:33:59 PM 34 Views
Did you even read that earlier post? - 07/12/2024 08:53:15 AM 37 Views
I can't believe I'm siding with Tom here - 07/12/2024 01:50:15 AM 36 Views
I guess you kinda have to with your profession. - 07/12/2024 07:46:01 PM 33 Views
Re: I guess you kinda have to with your profession. - 07/12/2024 08:07:28 PM 38 Views
See my other reply above then. *NM* - 07/12/2024 09:43:37 PM 12 Views
You're CLEARLY a Harris plant - 06/12/2024 01:07:07 AM 38 Views
Hah, you got me! - 06/12/2024 11:49:19 AM 35 Views
I'd be hesitant to link Biden with the Democrats anymore - 06/12/2024 01:24:44 AM 38 Views
Re: I'd be hesitant to link Biden with the Democrats anymore - 06/12/2024 01:47:08 AM 34 Views

Reply to Message