Active Users:559 Time:01/11/2026 02:07:02 AM
So what's your point about activism? Cannoli Send a noteboard - 11/02/2022 10:54:21 AM

View original post
I remember a time when some board members here used to ramble on about judicial activism, and sticking to the text of the Constitution.

After the recent order from the Supreme Court, would these folks like to prate on a little more about these values? Or is the hypocrisy too much even for them to bear?


Where is the hypocrisy? What text of the Constitution does this violate? Basically, the Supreme Court is telling the District Court not to interfere with the decision of the elected officials of the state. The Constitution gives the power to determine things like this to the states, not the federal courts.

Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
Judicial activism - 09/02/2022 09:33:40 PM 1082 Views
Can you reference - 09/02/2022 09:38:55 PM 798 Views
Agrees with Jeo *NM* - 09/02/2022 09:44:46 PM 420 Views
Here - 09/02/2022 11:27:15 PM 764 Views
So I can't read it - 09/02/2022 11:52:04 PM 754 Views
Here's the opinion itself - 10/02/2022 08:51:27 AM 852 Views
I don't understand that.. - 12/02/2022 06:53:06 PM 733 Views
we actually agree on this - 12/02/2022 07:04:56 PM 724 Views
Not just in 2022, though - 12/02/2022 07:10:48 PM 743 Views
Having grown up watching Cronkite, Huntley-Brinkley I concur with your point. - 12/02/2022 07:46:26 PM 758 Views
Yep *NM* - 12/02/2022 08:03:19 PM 417 Views
well I feel stupid - 10/02/2022 04:08:10 AM 760 Views
You're referring to an entirely different case... see my reply to Jeo for the details on this one. - 10/02/2022 09:03:40 AM 774 Views
Oops - 10/02/2022 03:32:33 PM 746 Views
Purpose achieved! I win again! *NM* - 12/02/2022 06:54:36 PM 401 Views
So what's your point about activism? - 11/02/2022 10:54:21 AM 785 Views
Hilarious that *you* would be whining about judicial activism. Shameless. *NM* - 12/02/2022 06:06:12 PM 420 Views
I have no issue with judicial activism, dolt. - 12/02/2022 07:06:49 PM 758 Views
Not your best analogy. - 12/02/2022 08:47:04 PM 743 Views
Actually, I consider it one of my best analogies. - 12/02/2022 09:19:40 PM 697 Views
you've made better - 12/02/2022 10:23:39 PM 735 Views
I dunno - 12/02/2022 10:34:57 PM 719 Views
why do you think this is an example of judicial activism? - 14/02/2022 09:01:40 PM 991 Views
I like how you don't even attempt to have a reasonable discussion - 16/02/2022 03:01:57 PM 739 Views
This amused me. *NM* - 16/02/2022 03:36:31 PM 409 Views
As it should - 16/02/2022 05:43:28 PM 768 Views
I'm sure you do - 16/02/2022 04:21:09 PM 700 Views
Your point is to troll - 16/02/2022 05:41:26 PM 750 Views
I'm truly devastated... - 17/02/2022 06:00:01 AM 721 Views
Will this continue? - 17/02/2022 04:07:11 PM 715 Views
No - 17/02/2022 07:11:12 PM 788 Views
Popcorn is always required! - 18/02/2022 03:14:01 PM 764 Views
Nobody ever offers to do a grilling, it is always popcorn. - 18/02/2022 06:51:17 PM 705 Views
One does not have a rational discussion if something is fundamentally "perverse" - 17/02/2022 12:21:32 AM 755 Views
I'm glad you can't resist me - 17/02/2022 07:09:43 PM 719 Views
Are you doing “well” in this dread of Winter? - 17/02/2022 08:05:04 PM 727 Views
Re: Judicial activism - 19/05/2022 11:16:24 PM 904 Views
He just doesn't understand what judicial activism means. - 20/05/2022 03:55:24 PM 702 Views

Reply to Message