Active Users:981 Time:06/11/2025 05:09:04 PM
So what's your point about activism? Cannoli Send a noteboard - 11/02/2022 10:54:21 AM

View original post
I remember a time when some board members here used to ramble on about judicial activism, and sticking to the text of the Constitution.

After the recent order from the Supreme Court, would these folks like to prate on a little more about these values? Or is the hypocrisy too much even for them to bear?


Where is the hypocrisy? What text of the Constitution does this violate? Basically, the Supreme Court is telling the District Court not to interfere with the decision of the elected officials of the state. The Constitution gives the power to determine things like this to the states, not the federal courts.

Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
Judicial activism - 09/02/2022 09:33:40 PM 855 Views
Can you reference - 09/02/2022 09:38:55 PM 561 Views
Agrees with Jeo *NM* - 09/02/2022 09:44:46 PM 298 Views
Here - 09/02/2022 11:27:15 PM 531 Views
So I can't read it - 09/02/2022 11:52:04 PM 526 Views
Here's the opinion itself - 10/02/2022 08:51:27 AM 614 Views
I don't understand that.. - 12/02/2022 06:53:06 PM 493 Views
we actually agree on this - 12/02/2022 07:04:56 PM 495 Views
Not just in 2022, though - 12/02/2022 07:10:48 PM 507 Views
Having grown up watching Cronkite, Huntley-Brinkley I concur with your point. - 12/02/2022 07:46:26 PM 526 Views
Yep *NM* - 12/02/2022 08:03:19 PM 300 Views
well I feel stupid - 10/02/2022 04:08:10 AM 506 Views
You're referring to an entirely different case... see my reply to Jeo for the details on this one. - 10/02/2022 09:03:40 AM 497 Views
Oops - 10/02/2022 03:32:33 PM 524 Views
Purpose achieved! I win again! *NM* - 12/02/2022 06:54:36 PM 281 Views
So what's your point about activism? - 11/02/2022 10:54:21 AM 559 Views
Hilarious that *you* would be whining about judicial activism. Shameless. *NM* - 12/02/2022 06:06:12 PM 300 Views
I have no issue with judicial activism, dolt. - 12/02/2022 07:06:49 PM 521 Views
Not your best analogy. - 12/02/2022 08:47:04 PM 499 Views
Actually, I consider it one of my best analogies. - 12/02/2022 09:19:40 PM 473 Views
you've made better - 12/02/2022 10:23:39 PM 508 Views
I dunno - 12/02/2022 10:34:57 PM 485 Views
why do you think this is an example of judicial activism? - 14/02/2022 09:01:40 PM 724 Views
I like how you don't even attempt to have a reasonable discussion - 16/02/2022 03:01:57 PM 511 Views
This amused me. *NM* - 16/02/2022 03:36:31 PM 286 Views
As it should - 16/02/2022 05:43:28 PM 518 Views
I'm sure you do - 16/02/2022 04:21:09 PM 493 Views
Your point is to troll - 16/02/2022 05:41:26 PM 527 Views
I'm truly devastated... - 17/02/2022 06:00:01 AM 487 Views
Will this continue? - 17/02/2022 04:07:11 PM 500 Views
No - 17/02/2022 07:11:12 PM 513 Views
Popcorn is always required! - 18/02/2022 03:14:01 PM 546 Views
Nobody ever offers to do a grilling, it is always popcorn. - 18/02/2022 06:51:17 PM 478 Views
One does not have a rational discussion if something is fundamentally "perverse" - 17/02/2022 12:21:32 AM 523 Views
I'm glad you can't resist me - 17/02/2022 07:09:43 PM 474 Views
Are you doing “well” in this dread of Winter? - 17/02/2022 08:05:04 PM 506 Views
Re: Judicial activism - 19/05/2022 11:16:24 PM 647 Views
He just doesn't understand what judicial activism means. - 20/05/2022 03:55:24 PM 463 Views

Reply to Message