Active Users:346 Time:10/04/2025 07:55:38 PM
Thanks to 4th Edition, sadly not. Werthead Send a noteboard - 10/01/2012 01:55:04 AM
My gaming group tried 4E and it split the group down the middle. Several players, mostly people who preferred non-D&D games and only played D&D to appease everyone else, really liked 4E and declared they would only play 4E from that point on if we wanted to play D&D (not coincidentally, they were also big WoW fans).

The rest of us didn't like 4E, though we spent about 3 months playing it and trying to make it work. We compromised by playing some other games for a while, but D&D had always been our default game and every time we went back to it things would bog down into edition wars. The other players weren't even willing to try Pathfinder. So in the end the group splintered apart.

Ironically, I don't think 4E is a particularly bad rules-set and take no pleasure from its failure. In fact, it would make an excellent rules-set for a MALAZAN RPG (where even common grunts can take on gods and survive). It just isn't really the same game as D&D, and throws too much out in an attempt to be relevant and modern.
Reply to message
D&D 5th Edition... Hard to believe how many years this has been going. - 09/01/2012 10:47:30 PM 1566 Views
We still play 3.5 - 09/01/2012 11:05:52 PM 1015 Views
Nerd! *NM* - 09/01/2012 11:13:04 PM 558 Views
Yessssssss - 10/01/2012 08:51:04 AM 1042 Views
I use 3.5 rules too... - 13/01/2012 05:50:58 PM 1054 Views
Thanks to 4th Edition, sadly not. - 10/01/2012 01:55:04 AM 918 Views
Hey now! - 10/01/2012 08:50:02 AM 952 Views
I found this blog entry enlightening: - 10/01/2012 01:41:12 PM 1057 Views
Dunno about the "Old-School Revival," but Pathfinder is definitely pretty popular - 10/01/2012 02:21:37 PM 965 Views
I started playing when 2E came out. - 10/01/2012 03:01:45 PM 1069 Views
Same here. - 11/01/2012 02:20:41 AM 919 Views
Re: Dunno about the "Old-School Revival," but Pathfinder is definitely pretty popular - 10/01/2012 04:34:39 PM 984 Views
If you want to know more, read this thread. - 11/01/2012 02:42:06 PM 1002 Views
Cool, thanks. *NM* - 11/01/2012 03:40:46 PM 510 Views
I can't wait to see the Edition Wars™ flare up again. - 10/01/2012 02:55:27 PM 1138 Views
True story: - 10/01/2012 04:39:47 PM 1044 Views
I still play 3.5 - 10/01/2012 04:31:27 PM 1013 Views
The last time I played an AD&D CRPG, it had THAC0. - 10/01/2012 07:47:47 PM 975 Views
Baldur's Gate, woo! - 11/01/2012 03:49:49 PM 903 Views
That was a Warrior trait, not a human one. - 11/01/2012 07:18:09 PM 1060 Views
That sounds insanely unintuitive. *NM* - 11/01/2012 07:37:37 PM 525 Views
That's 2nd Edition. - 11/01/2012 10:59:34 PM 875 Views
I repeat what FT said, that was 2nd edition. *NM* - 12/01/2012 04:20:28 AM 472 Views
AD&D represent! *throws up half-orc gang signs* *NM* - 13/01/2012 01:50:06 AM 605 Views
Throwing up a half-eaten rat is not throwing up a gang sign... *NM* - 13/01/2012 05:26:47 AM 526 Views
What about a half-eaten halfling? - 13/01/2012 02:41:06 PM 1007 Views
*facedesk* *NM* - 13/01/2012 03:45:05 PM 460 Views
(-:,` *NM* - 17/01/2012 09:02:26 PM 515 Views
Been re-reading The Sleeping Dragon, have you? - 25/01/2012 05:29:15 PM 981 Views
I honestly have no idea what you're talking about. - 25/01/2012 06:41:46 PM 1021 Views
A joke in Joel Rosenbergs "The Sleeping Dragon." - 25/01/2012 07:13:26 PM 1052 Views
*sign* *NM* - 13/01/2012 02:41:57 PM 524 Views
*hollas* - 25/01/2012 05:30:45 PM 898 Views
GURPS is still in 4E. - 25/01/2012 05:58:34 PM 940 Views
What? I've barely had the opportunity to play 4th Edition yet. - 11/01/2012 02:38:50 AM 884 Views
Dude.. I still remember the 1st edition books.. - 11/01/2012 12:54:27 PM 1074 Views

Reply to Message