Active Users:432 Time:04/04/2025 07:08:42 PM
Thanks to 4th Edition, sadly not. Werthead Send a noteboard - 10/01/2012 01:55:04 AM
My gaming group tried 4E and it split the group down the middle. Several players, mostly people who preferred non-D&D games and only played D&D to appease everyone else, really liked 4E and declared they would only play 4E from that point on if we wanted to play D&D (not coincidentally, they were also big WoW fans).

The rest of us didn't like 4E, though we spent about 3 months playing it and trying to make it work. We compromised by playing some other games for a while, but D&D had always been our default game and every time we went back to it things would bog down into edition wars. The other players weren't even willing to try Pathfinder. So in the end the group splintered apart.

Ironically, I don't think 4E is a particularly bad rules-set and take no pleasure from its failure. In fact, it would make an excellent rules-set for a MALAZAN RPG (where even common grunts can take on gods and survive). It just isn't really the same game as D&D, and throws too much out in an attempt to be relevant and modern.
Reply to message
D&D 5th Edition... Hard to believe how many years this has been going. - 09/01/2012 10:47:30 PM 1563 Views
We still play 3.5 - 09/01/2012 11:05:52 PM 1014 Views
Nerd! *NM* - 09/01/2012 11:13:04 PM 558 Views
Yessssssss - 10/01/2012 08:51:04 AM 1039 Views
I use 3.5 rules too... - 13/01/2012 05:50:58 PM 1049 Views
Thanks to 4th Edition, sadly not. - 10/01/2012 01:55:04 AM 917 Views
Hey now! - 10/01/2012 08:50:02 AM 950 Views
I found this blog entry enlightening: - 10/01/2012 01:41:12 PM 1054 Views
Dunno about the "Old-School Revival," but Pathfinder is definitely pretty popular - 10/01/2012 02:21:37 PM 962 Views
I started playing when 2E came out. - 10/01/2012 03:01:45 PM 1066 Views
Same here. - 11/01/2012 02:20:41 AM 916 Views
Re: Dunno about the "Old-School Revival," but Pathfinder is definitely pretty popular - 10/01/2012 04:34:39 PM 981 Views
If you want to know more, read this thread. - 11/01/2012 02:42:06 PM 1000 Views
Cool, thanks. *NM* - 11/01/2012 03:40:46 PM 509 Views
I can't wait to see the Edition Wars™ flare up again. - 10/01/2012 02:55:27 PM 1134 Views
True story: - 10/01/2012 04:39:47 PM 1043 Views
I still play 3.5 - 10/01/2012 04:31:27 PM 1009 Views
The last time I played an AD&D CRPG, it had THAC0. - 10/01/2012 07:47:47 PM 972 Views
Baldur's Gate, woo! - 11/01/2012 03:49:49 PM 900 Views
That was a Warrior trait, not a human one. - 11/01/2012 07:18:09 PM 1057 Views
That sounds insanely unintuitive. *NM* - 11/01/2012 07:37:37 PM 524 Views
That's 2nd Edition. - 11/01/2012 10:59:34 PM 872 Views
I repeat what FT said, that was 2nd edition. *NM* - 12/01/2012 04:20:28 AM 471 Views
AD&D represent! *throws up half-orc gang signs* *NM* - 13/01/2012 01:50:06 AM 604 Views
Throwing up a half-eaten rat is not throwing up a gang sign... *NM* - 13/01/2012 05:26:47 AM 525 Views
What about a half-eaten halfling? - 13/01/2012 02:41:06 PM 1004 Views
*facedesk* *NM* - 13/01/2012 03:45:05 PM 459 Views
(-:,` *NM* - 17/01/2012 09:02:26 PM 514 Views
Been re-reading The Sleeping Dragon, have you? - 25/01/2012 05:29:15 PM 979 Views
I honestly have no idea what you're talking about. - 25/01/2012 06:41:46 PM 1018 Views
A joke in Joel Rosenbergs "The Sleeping Dragon." - 25/01/2012 07:13:26 PM 1050 Views
*sign* *NM* - 13/01/2012 02:41:57 PM 523 Views
*hollas* - 25/01/2012 05:30:45 PM 896 Views
GURPS is still in 4E. - 25/01/2012 05:58:34 PM 939 Views
What? I've barely had the opportunity to play 4th Edition yet. - 11/01/2012 02:38:50 AM 881 Views
Dude.. I still remember the 1st edition books.. - 11/01/2012 12:54:27 PM 1071 Views

Reply to Message