Active Users:196 Time:17/04/2025 02:32:27 AM
Both, in certain areas. nossy Send a noteboard - 04/09/2009 08:09:26 PM
There are a lot of healthy food that doesn't cost that much to eat. With smart shopping fresh produce isn't expensive. Wheat bread cost the same as white bread and even the fancy multi grain bread isn't that much more expensive.

But multi-grain IS more expensive, and wheat is the same as eating white in most cases. So what if multi-grain is more? Well, think about multiplying that times all 50 of the items you're buying. If the healthy option is a couple bucks more expensive in every case, it adds up.

And convenient foods are crap, so you have to think ahead to be healthy, in most cases. That's not always easy.
Reply to message
Wow! Weight and Diet info for women in America. - 04/09/2009 07:11:28 PM 1279 Views
Scary but hardly surprising - 04/09/2009 07:29:59 PM 596 Views
Re: Scary but hardly surprising - 04/09/2009 07:34:46 PM 655 Views
Is healthy food more expensive or just less convenient? - 04/09/2009 08:00:45 PM 554 Views
Both, in certain areas. - 04/09/2009 08:09:26 PM 624 Views
yes. - 07/09/2009 12:06:42 AM 652 Views
Well also... - 07/09/2009 12:05:48 AM 705 Views
Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject. - 04/09/2009 08:06:19 PM 748 Views
Re: Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject. - 04/09/2009 08:10:30 PM 597 Views
But when did "beautiful" come to mean "beloved"? - 04/09/2009 09:37:41 PM 593 Views
No I mean beautiful - 05/09/2009 07:00:23 AM 830 Views
Hrm - 04/09/2009 07:43:12 PM 683 Views
I also thought the 5'7" 100 pound size 8 was wack. - 04/09/2009 07:46:49 PM 652 Views
*shrugs* I dn't know too much about weight and such from the woman perspective. - 04/09/2009 07:53:01 PM 639 Views
Sareitha is right about the range - 04/09/2009 08:11:22 PM 659 Views
Re: Sareitha is right about the range - 04/09/2009 08:13:06 PM 605 Views
You're not 5'8" - 04/09/2009 08:02:32 PM 575 Views
Yes I am. - 04/09/2009 08:06:33 PM 596 Views
Yes she is. - 06/09/2009 04:02:52 PM 721 Views
To be fair, - 06/09/2009 04:05:55 PM 681 Views
ha! - 06/09/2009 04:07:45 PM 709 Views
5'8" here... - 05/09/2009 02:28:52 AM 614 Views
Yes. - 04/09/2009 08:50:41 PM 562 Views
Are they British sizes? - 04/09/2009 09:01:01 PM 575 Views
It would make more sense... - 04/09/2009 09:17:20 PM 533 Views
I wondered that too - 04/09/2009 09:37:54 PM 595 Views
Wait do British sizes start at 6? - 06/09/2009 04:06:31 PM 693 Views
Uh I'm not actually sure - 06/09/2009 08:03:29 PM 807 Views
Yes though - 07/09/2009 12:03:11 AM 666 Views
No, American. - 04/09/2009 09:40:36 PM 915 Views
Er, that was me. - 04/09/2009 09:41:15 PM 608 Views
Did you mean 14 British is huge? - 04/09/2009 09:43:37 PM 641 Views
Okay, let's be relative. - 04/09/2009 09:47:21 PM 602 Views
Erm.... - 05/09/2009 01:08:16 AM 638 Views
I have to doubt some of their facts. - 04/09/2009 08:13:43 PM 559 Views
Some stats do seem a bit extreme... - 04/09/2009 09:23:10 PM 554 Views
well, someone who is 5'4" and 140 lbs isn't a size 14, I don't think... - 05/09/2009 12:26:34 AM 652 Views
It's not. - 06/09/2009 05:29:27 AM 736 Views
O.O *NM* - 04/09/2009 08:15:25 PM 292 Views
interesting and scary... - 05/09/2009 12:28:05 AM 576 Views
100 lbs is a lot smaller than a size 8...more like a 0/2/4 *NM* - 05/09/2009 12:59:36 AM 291 Views
I actually - 06/09/2009 04:08:24 PM 661 Views
My niece weighs 90lbs - 06/09/2009 10:04:51 PM 640 Views
exactly! *NM* - 07/09/2009 12:03:35 AM 309 Views

Reply to Message