Active Users:1107 Time:22/11/2024 08:00:16 AM
Both, in certain areas. nossy Send a noteboard - 04/09/2009 08:09:26 PM
There are a lot of healthy food that doesn't cost that much to eat. With smart shopping fresh produce isn't expensive. Wheat bread cost the same as white bread and even the fancy multi grain bread isn't that much more expensive.

But multi-grain IS more expensive, and wheat is the same as eating white in most cases. So what if multi-grain is more? Well, think about multiplying that times all 50 of the items you're buying. If the healthy option is a couple bucks more expensive in every case, it adds up.

And convenient foods are crap, so you have to think ahead to be healthy, in most cases. That's not always easy.
Reply to message
Wow! Weight and Diet info for women in America. - 04/09/2009 07:11:28 PM 1206 Views
Scary but hardly surprising - 04/09/2009 07:29:59 PM 522 Views
Re: Scary but hardly surprising - 04/09/2009 07:34:46 PM 581 Views
Is healthy food more expensive or just less convenient? - 04/09/2009 08:00:45 PM 475 Views
Both, in certain areas. - 04/09/2009 08:09:26 PM 549 Views
yes. - 07/09/2009 12:06:42 AM 571 Views
Well also... - 07/09/2009 12:05:48 AM 632 Views
Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject. - 04/09/2009 08:06:19 PM 663 Views
Re: Here is an article my friend posted on Facebook about the subject. - 04/09/2009 08:10:30 PM 523 Views
But when did "beautiful" come to mean "beloved"? - 04/09/2009 09:37:41 PM 510 Views
No I mean beautiful - 05/09/2009 07:00:23 AM 758 Views
Hrm - 04/09/2009 07:43:12 PM 607 Views
I also thought the 5'7" 100 pound size 8 was wack. - 04/09/2009 07:46:49 PM 577 Views
*shrugs* I dn't know too much about weight and such from the woman perspective. - 04/09/2009 07:53:01 PM 560 Views
Sareitha is right about the range - 04/09/2009 08:11:22 PM 588 Views
Re: Sareitha is right about the range - 04/09/2009 08:13:06 PM 553 Views
You're not 5'8" - 04/09/2009 08:02:32 PM 493 Views
Yes I am. - 04/09/2009 08:06:33 PM 521 Views
Yes she is. - 06/09/2009 04:02:52 PM 647 Views
To be fair, - 06/09/2009 04:05:55 PM 612 Views
ha! - 06/09/2009 04:07:45 PM 633 Views
5'8" here... - 05/09/2009 02:28:52 AM 536 Views
Yes. - 04/09/2009 08:50:41 PM 488 Views
Are they British sizes? - 04/09/2009 09:01:01 PM 492 Views
It would make more sense... - 04/09/2009 09:17:20 PM 463 Views
I wondered that too - 04/09/2009 09:37:54 PM 525 Views
Wait do British sizes start at 6? - 06/09/2009 04:06:31 PM 609 Views
Uh I'm not actually sure - 06/09/2009 08:03:29 PM 736 Views
Yes though - 07/09/2009 12:03:11 AM 582 Views
No, American. - 04/09/2009 09:40:36 PM 846 Views
Er, that was me. - 04/09/2009 09:41:15 PM 535 Views
Did you mean 14 British is huge? - 04/09/2009 09:43:37 PM 564 Views
Okay, let's be relative. - 04/09/2009 09:47:21 PM 532 Views
Erm.... - 05/09/2009 01:08:16 AM 557 Views
I have to doubt some of their facts. - 04/09/2009 08:13:43 PM 490 Views
Some stats do seem a bit extreme... - 04/09/2009 09:23:10 PM 477 Views
well, someone who is 5'4" and 140 lbs isn't a size 14, I don't think... - 05/09/2009 12:26:34 AM 579 Views
It's not. - 06/09/2009 05:29:27 AM 661 Views
O.O *NM* - 04/09/2009 08:15:25 PM 267 Views
interesting and scary... - 05/09/2009 12:28:05 AM 508 Views
100 lbs is a lot smaller than a size 8...more like a 0/2/4 *NM* - 05/09/2009 12:59:36 AM 263 Views
I actually - 06/09/2009 04:08:24 PM 592 Views
My niece weighs 90lbs - 06/09/2009 10:04:51 PM 569 Views
exactly! *NM* - 07/09/2009 12:03:35 AM 280 Views

Reply to Message