I don't understand why so many people were worried that their Medicare was going to evaporate. If anything, the bill appears to be expanding it?
A large segment of the media and the establishment have been crying bloody murder over any reform whatsoever, labeling it as fascist, communist, socialist, and any other words (which in tandem make zero sense since many of those are diametrically opposed to one another) which they believe hold shock value and might stick. One of the many avenues of attack was that the Democrats were looking to "take your Medicare and use it to fund socialized medicine" (completely ignoring the fact that Medicare is socialized medicine and the only bill which was ever proposed that involved getting rid of Medicare was a Republican one, to boot).
It's a consequence of the modern era where people can choose their own brand of information, where opinion and conjecture is injected into it and referred to as the "news" - they choose what invalidates and exaggerates their own opinion to begin with, rather that being informed of the reality of the situation.
This message last edited by Jragghen on 22/03/2010 at 07:52:46 PM
Obamacare: Explained?
22/03/2010 07:21:44 PM
- 672 Views
Someone had a good link earlier...
22/03/2010 07:32:36 PM
- 514 Views
Thanks
23/03/2010 03:48:04 AM
- 294 Views
They don't, or at least not in this bill. That'll have to be a new bill.
23/03/2010 09:22:19 AM
- 315 Views
What the bill does, and when each part gets implemented
22/03/2010 07:42:26 PM
- 583 Views
This is wonderful thank you. I've already picked my favorite.
22/03/2010 07:47:59 PM
- 333 Views
Fear, uncertainty, and doubt
22/03/2010 07:52:29 PM
- 371 Views
this is why I believe in dictatorships
22/03/2010 08:05:14 PM
- 317 Views
It's all populism, really
23/03/2010 03:51:31 AM
- 311 Views
OOoo I like that idea.
23/03/2010 04:20:48 AM
- 319 Views
Re: OOoo I like that idea.
23/03/2010 03:01:08 PM
- 318 Views
Senators don't constantly campaign though.
23/03/2010 04:20:51 PM
- 304 Views
I don't think that's the point though...
23/03/2010 09:35:29 PM
- 335 Views
To the extent the framers intended an elitist legislature, they erred, IMHO.
29/03/2010 01:43:34 PM
- 417 Views
At one point some of the concerns were valid.
23/03/2010 06:03:29 AM
- 493 Views
Re: At one point some of the concerns were valid.
23/03/2010 03:05:58 PM
- 381 Views
We can't pay for the subsidies; even after the tax hike they increase debt in the short term.
23/03/2010 04:12:14 PM
- 410 Views
Re: We can't pay for the subsidies; even after the tax hike they increase debt in the short term.
23/03/2010 09:40:53 PM
- 411 Views
Can't find that link in this thread, but the CBO seems to agree with you, not me.
23/03/2010 11:47:29 PM
- 621 Views
I don't agree
24/03/2010 08:52:12 PM
- 408 Views
"Free market" is a VERY big phrase.
25/03/2010 07:32:06 AM
- 316 Views
Re: This is wonderful thank you. I've already picked my favorite.
22/03/2010 08:04:50 PM
- 315 Views
Re: This is wonderful thank you. I've already picked my favorite.
22/03/2010 08:07:39 PM
- 311 Views
Re: This is wonderful thank you. I've already picked my favorite.
22/03/2010 08:28:10 PM
- 317 Views
The $900 billion is essentially just government subsidies: Healthcare's gotten THAT expensive.
23/03/2010 06:23:01 AM
- 328 Views
you make it sound like this is the end-all bill.
23/03/2010 12:01:20 PM
- 309 Views
I doubt we'll see another bill after the reconciliation bill.
23/03/2010 02:05:59 PM
- 316 Views
no, the "now or doomed" mindset is not why I'm willing to wait
23/03/2010 03:23:21 PM
- 322 Views
Well, if you really are waiting for them to fix it later you'll wait a long time.
23/03/2010 04:33:25 PM
- 293 Views
It's quite simple.
23/03/2010 04:23:45 PM
- 371 Views
And what does government-run health care have to do with this bill?
23/03/2010 04:25:28 PM
- 330 Views