Active Users:805 Time:25/11/2024 11:56:25 AM
I looked hard to find that reading before I posted, and couldn't see it, but it's there now. Joel Send a noteboard - 17/01/2010 05:34:58 PM
Of course, I don't know of many other countries that originate from a slave revolt, so in that regard "first" may be fairly meaningless. It's also possible they're just referring to cases of colonial independence in which the newly independent state was not primarily inhabited and dominated by European colonists, as was the case with the United States and a fair number of Latin-American states. The situation of the white colonists in the American colonies may have been such as to warrant revolution, but it certainly wasn't comparable to the situation of the indigenous inhabitants of most European colonies both before and after that time.

I still think it's ambiguously worded (it can mean those colonists were the first to successfully revolt, and also happened to be slaves, or it could mean first successful slave revolt) but the context definitely supports your reading. And like you, my mental list of "successful slave revolts against colonial masters" is fairly short; maybe my mind just didn't want to go that direction.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 17/01/2010 at 05:35:27 PM
Reply to message
Why is Limbaugh such an a$$hole? - 16/01/2010 06:15:27 AM 834 Views
Simple - 16/01/2010 01:10:39 PM 448 Views
Bingo. - 17/01/2010 03:11:02 AM 353 Views
Support your claim with evidence - 16/01/2010 05:46:09 PM 401 Views
give me the link for the transcript word for word - 17/01/2010 07:41:10 AM 438 Views
Do your own research, preferably before posting to begin with - 17/01/2010 10:39:47 AM 762 Views
I appreciate what you're doing here - 17/01/2010 10:53:44 AM 386 Views
Facts are important things - 17/01/2010 11:37:01 AM 355 Views
Yes, they are. Let me clarify: are you defending Pat Robertson as well? - 17/01/2010 03:47:48 PM 383 Views
No - 17/01/2010 05:01:58 PM 380 Views
Re: Do your own research, preferably before posting to begin with - 18/01/2010 12:17:32 PM 533 Views
I thought Robertson was the biggest douchebag of all, and an idiot as well. - 16/01/2010 06:05:15 PM 383 Views
Sounds like it boils down to the old charges of atheism in the French Revolution. - 17/01/2010 03:04:45 AM 377 Views
The key word in that sentence is "the first slaves". - 17/01/2010 05:18:49 PM 353 Views
I looked hard to find that reading before I posted, and couldn't see it, but it's there now. - 17/01/2010 05:34:58 PM 361 Views
Re: Why is Keith Olbermann such an a$$hole? *NM* - 16/01/2010 06:29:14 PM 144 Views
You must understand: Robertson is not from a religious family turned to politics, but the opposite. - 17/01/2010 02:54:29 AM 377 Views
grr.. thinking hard. must bash joel... - 17/01/2010 09:10:05 AM 473 Views
Go Vikings? I mean, Cowboys... no, wait, Vikings.... - 17/01/2010 09:14:27 AM 361 Views
I am still waiting - 17/01/2010 05:39:40 AM 374 Views

Reply to Message