Active Users:843 Time:25/11/2024 12:15:50 PM
I looked hard to find that reading before I posted, and couldn't see it, but it's there now. - Edit 1

Before modification by Joel at 17/01/2010 05:35:27 PM

Of course, I don't know of many other countries that originate from a slave revolt, so in that regard "first" may be fairly meaningless. It's also possible they're just referring to cases of colonial independence in which the newly independent state was not primarily inhabited and dominated by European colonists, as was the case with the United States and a fair number of Latin-American states. The situation of the white colonists in the American colonies may have been such as to warrant revolution, but it certainly wasn't comparable to the situation of the indigenous inhabitants of most European colonies both before and after that time.

I still think it's ambiguously worded (it can mean those colonists were the first to successfully revolt, and also happened to be slaves, or it could mean first successful slave revolt) but the context definitely supports for your reading. And like you, my mental list of "successful slave revolts against colonial masters" is fairly short; maybe my mind just didn't want to go that direction.

Return to message