Active Users:1139 Time:22/11/2024 08:56:50 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: Tough. Rebekah Send a noteboard - 16/11/2013 07:41:49 PM

View original postOthers have already said what I was going to say, but I wanted to offer support anyway.

Aw, thanks.
View original postI don't think you're being at all unreasonable, but I probably wouldn't think legal proceedings were worth it (I'm lazy). Maybe wait w/o making a stink until one of the holiday lets actually turns out to be horrible - then you'd have a case if you wanted to make it?

I suspect that's what we'll end up doing, but the nosy neighbour thinks she's got some tricks up her sleeve that she won't tell me about.
*MySmiley*

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
Reply to message
What would you do? Rebekah - 15/11/2013 07:33:08 PM 2203 Views
Hrm. Sareitha Sedai - 15/11/2013 08:30:22 PM 890 Views
Re: Hrm. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 09:57:02 AM 910 Views
Don't they need to apply for planning permission to do that? Aviendha - 15/11/2013 10:10:35 PM 958 Views
Also doesn't she need to apply for change of use to holiday let from residential? Aviendha - 15/11/2013 10:12:59 PM 908 Views
For the door, yes. For the holiday let, I don't think so. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 09:58:30 AM 909 Views
Hm. Tricky, that. Legolas - 15/11/2013 10:38:57 PM 982 Views
Re: Hm. Tricky, that. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 09:59:57 AM 970 Views
If there is anything you can do to fight it, do so Wibble - 16/11/2013 01:25:28 AM 998 Views
Yes. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 10:03:03 AM 945 Views
The most reasonable thing would be to cut a bitch. LiterateDog - 16/11/2013 02:47:42 AM 1010 Views
this sounds fully reasonable, yeah. temeraire - 16/11/2013 03:22:46 AM 1014 Views
Quite. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 10:06:43 AM 861 Views
Cutting a bitch is always an answer. *NM* @my - 20/11/2013 02:20:06 PM 634 Views
Tough. nossy - 16/11/2013 10:15:21 AM 925 Views
Re: Tough. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 07:41:49 PM 868 Views
Perhaps I don't grasp the gravity of the situation. Palatine - 16/11/2013 03:52:15 PM 928 Views
It's more irritating that grave, but I do worry about security to an extent. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 07:47:02 PM 837 Views
Re: I hear you. Palatine - 17/11/2013 03:50:44 PM 997 Views
Re: I hear you. Rebekah - 18/11/2013 05:03:15 PM 910 Views
do you let your child play unsupervised now? random thoughts - 16/11/2013 06:46:08 PM 843 Views
Not precisely. Rebekah - 16/11/2013 08:01:54 PM 792 Views
Uh...isn't the nature of ownership that you can do what you want to with your property? Tom - 16/11/2013 10:27:05 PM 788 Views
Not always, according to what title deeds and zoning restrictions say. *NM* Rebekah - 16/11/2013 10:32:20 PM 402 Views
Well, then you do some research before you start a shit storm with your neighbors. *NM* Tom - 18/11/2013 03:42:43 PM 417 Views
Which obviously we have done, Tim being who he is and all. *NM* Rebekah - 18/11/2013 04:49:45 PM 430 Views
Well, so what is the neighbor doing wrong? *NM* Tom - 18/11/2013 05:50:25 PM 438 Views
It depends on interpretation, from what I understand. Rebekah - 18/11/2013 07:17:03 PM 860 Views
Well, I'm not licensed in Scotland Tom - 19/11/2013 03:04:02 PM 809 Views
How is a short-term holiday rental not a business? LiterateDog - 19/11/2013 06:01:50 PM 937 Views
For zoning purposes it's being used as a residence. Don't be daft. Tom - 20/11/2013 02:24:54 PM 833 Views
It's not being used as a residence. No-one is living there. Rebekah - 20/11/2013 04:26:05 PM 888 Views
The essence of the question was "Would you think it worth the bother to seek an injunction?" Tim - 19/11/2013 07:01:30 PM 1025 Views
I am a fan of British English usually, but not in the case of "flat". And yes, I'd go for interdict Tom - 20/11/2013 02:27:19 PM 831 Views
Another lovely piece of Language peculiar to Scots Law... majander - 27/11/2013 04:34:23 PM 958 Views
Though I always thought interdict was the Pope excommunicating an entire nation. *NM* Tom - 20/11/2013 02:30:23 PM 444 Views
Yes, but subject to limitations. Tim - 19/11/2013 07:03:40 PM 1153 Views
Yes, restrictive covenants. And those things can be unreasonable and still legal. Tom - 20/11/2013 02:29:45 PM 842 Views
I would get the garden monitored with a camera Sports_Gambler - 17/11/2013 04:00:51 AM 862 Views
Not a possiblity. *NM* Rebekah - 18/11/2013 07:17:35 PM 497 Views
I can't see much you can do really... Sports_Gambler - 19/11/2013 03:01:40 AM 885 Views
Does the building have a factor? majander - 19/11/2013 11:38:43 AM 832 Views
Yes indeed. Rebekah - 19/11/2013 07:13:06 PM 808 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes