Yes I'm aware of your attitude about Wisconsin, it comes so vividly to mind because it was the last time I watched you fly so off the handle on the board. You're passionate about it, which is find, but also terribly blind. You sound like a man screaming about how the enemy bombed a city and that that by itself justifies the war and every time its pointed that his side has done it before too finds some excuse, "It was different", "It was long ago", "That isn't the same". What's horrible is that you regularly drop huge openings for me with your cherry-picking. "They didn't pass it as a budget bill"? Not passing budget items as budget and vice-versa. Might I remind you that it was via Reconciliation (that process for budget items) that Obamacare was finally passed.
Reid has regularly been asked to put funding Obamacare or repealing Obamacare up to a straight vote, he's declined, but you expect Boehner to do something similar?
All of your arguments keep getting reduced to cherry-picking, double standards, and ad hominem. Obamacare got passed under shady procedural methods and could not be passed again today, I doubt it could even get a majority in the senate. I don't know why you and some others think that once something is passed it is forever but that's your whole basis. The GOP has been demanding another vote on this for 3 years, I can think of no other law where it supporters would be afraid to let it be voted on again. And that's the Left's whole argument, that the rights demands that this be voted on again when last time it couldn't even be passed without resulting to reconciliation is somehow immoral.
i never said once something is passed it's forever. i have argued here and on the other thread that your side has had three years to pass something that does not require completely undoing Obamacare. instead they've taken 42 votes and counting which are doomed to fail on defunding and repeal, and offered nothing of substance to replace it. you should know how law making works since you've claimed to have written several bills over your lifetime. the House has to put something up that the Senate can agree to if they want it to be made into law. when the Senate says from the beginning that the House's bill is DOA, and gets a veto threat before they've even submitted the bill for consideration, it should be an indication that they should try harder to put something out there which has a chance of actually getting discussed.
darrell issa himself said his dream plan to replace Obamacare would be to have a federal exchange for people to buy insurance to try to lower rates, discontinue pre-existing condition denials for new coverage, and prevent insurance companies from dropping patients. pretty much the three biggest things Obamacare was designed to do, he says would be in his dream legislation. so i ask yet again: what is so terrible about Obamacare that it requires punishing the entire country and threatening world economic instability? if i am cherry picking, then you are wearing rose colored glasses for not seeing how destructive your party is being with their quixotic attempt to make the actual majority of americans bend to their collective will.
"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman