Paul is saying what he always has: The commander-in-chief needs Congress' permission to command
Joel Send a noteboard - 03/09/2013 02:08:34 AM
View original postPlease point to how what they are saying matches what you are saying. By the way the WH is claiming that they don't need the approval of congress to act so it will be hard to claim later that he was bound by congress. Hell he bombs other countries on regular basis without congressional approval. He even bomber the moon.
Which, again, gives Obamas hasty "red line" pledge the escape clause he desperately wants in the face of overwhelming popular opposition. Lieberman and King are not saying he needs congressional assent, granted, but ARE saying he is obligated to ignore Congress and do the very thing the rest of their party threatened impeachment for doing without congressional approval. So, as lame as Obamas abrupt flip flop is, the "loyal" opposition mirroring it with a flip flop of their own is even lamer. He can at least claim intimidation from polling or make an appeal to constitutional balance of power: What is their excuse for saying the very thing they called impeachable for months is now a constitutional duty?
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
So... a limited strike on Syria ?
- 29/08/2013 04:31:07 PM
1098 Views
Re: So... a limited strike on Syria ?
- 29/08/2013 10:43:15 PM
638 Views
I think you're wrong.
- 30/08/2013 04:44:53 AM
619 Views
I don't really care
- 30/08/2013 10:35:55 AM
619 Views
You can't effectively bomb Chemical and biological weapons stockpiles without using a nuke.
- 30/08/2013 02:01:38 PM
657 Views
Looks like the buck inexplicably stops at Congress
- 31/08/2013 11:23:20 PM
576 Views
Well it sets a good precedent anyway
- 01/09/2013 12:13:05 AM
549 Views
Unsure; I like the War Powers Resolution approach, though I am unsure of its constitutionality.
- 01/09/2013 01:49:15 AM
729 Views
Nice theory, to bad it is crap
- 01/09/2013 06:23:31 PM
553 Views
Again, Rand Paul is loony left now?
- 01/09/2013 10:15:17 PM
765 Views
Again you seem to have read most the words but completely missed the point
- 02/09/2013 06:48:26 PM
700 Views
Rand Paul=/=MSNBC
- 02/09/2013 09:30:50 PM
560 Views
No... not quite. Youre really are quite skilled at missing the point aren't you?
- 02/09/2013 11:20:02 PM
604 Views
Oh, no, I got the point.
- 03/09/2013 01:48:01 AM
603 Views
The only "point" you have is the talking points, and you hit them all, facts be damned. *NM*
- 03/09/2013 02:56:06 AM
241 Views
Considering the WPRs constitutionality and agreeing Obama is being cowardly are not talking points.
- 03/09/2013 03:52:44 AM
705 Views
Re: Considering the WPRs ... talking points. (had to snip it due to length)
- 03/09/2013 05:49:08 PM
635 Views
"The only 'point' you have is the talking points...;" clearly those were not the sole points,
- 03/09/2013 10:08:43 PM
658 Views
Nah, I'm good, I've said what I wanted. I'm sure we'll get the opportunity to disagree again 
- 04/09/2013 05:58:47 AM
694 Views
- 04/09/2013 05:58:47 AM
694 Views
Fox and Joe Lieberman=/=MSNBC either.
- 02/09/2013 10:21:16 PM
704 Views
Again you seem to have read most the words but completely missed the point
- 03/09/2013 01:17:29 AM
525 Views
Paul is saying what he always has: The commander-in-chief needs Congress' permission to command
- 03/09/2013 02:08:34 AM
539 Views
I see what the problem is
- 04/09/2013 01:07:08 PM
560 Views
More like the left hive does not know what the right hive is doing; Republicans are NOT cat herders.
- 04/09/2013 09:57:07 PM
636 Views
Yeah, I don't like any of it.
- 01/09/2013 12:40:35 AM
582 Views
Glad to hear you think he should more like Bush and asked congrees first
- 01/09/2013 06:27:03 PM
521 Views
How about no strike per the American people? Period. Fucking idiots in Washington.
- 01/09/2013 05:01:13 AM
610 Views
Re: How about no strike per the American people? Period. Fucking idiots in Washington.
- 01/09/2013 04:06:13 PM
652 Views
To be fair, that was what the American people said in 1940
- 02/09/2013 05:19:46 AM
564 Views
That comparison is not valid.
- 05/09/2013 09:25:38 PM
586 Views
Again, "I am not saying this situation is remotely like that one."
- 05/09/2013 10:48:39 PM
550 Views