On the basis that, even if the communicator is an idiot of the highest degree, charitable reading transforms their babble into something more worthwhile to society.
But it'd be even better to say that each party should pull as much weight as they can (even if it is more than their fair share), or else they are each doing themselves a disservice.
But it'd be even better to say that each party should pull as much weight as they can (even if it is more than their fair share), or else they are each doing themselves a disservice.
||||||||||*MySmiley*
Only so evil.
Only so evil.
This message last edited by Burr on 27/01/2013 at 03:58:54 PM
Implication
- 24/01/2013 11:31:45 PM
637 Views
Quit trying to weasel out of foolish posts with sophomoric writing. *NM*
- 25/01/2013 12:19:21 AM
166 Views
Wow.... seriously? I didn't think I would have to explain.... *NM*
- 25/01/2013 12:41:17 AM
282 Views
I've always thought that the impetus is on the communicator.
- 25/01/2013 03:23:00 PM
497 Views
I'd argue as much or more for charitable reading.
- 27/01/2013 03:55:09 PM
464 Views