I'd argue as much or more for charitable reading. - Edit 1
Before modification by Burr at 27/01/2013 03:58:54 PM
On the basis that, even if the communicator is an idiot of the highest degree, charitable reading transforms their babble into something more worthwhile to society.
But it'd be even better to say that each party should pull as much weight as they can (even if it is more than their fair share), or else they are each doing themselves a disservice.
But it'd be even better to say that each party should pull as much weight as they can (even if it is more than their fair share), or else they are each doing themselves a disservice.