but the pro-life (or anti-abortion) argument was the reason they gave for not allowing an abortion
moondog Send a noteboard - 15/11/2012 10:00:14 PM
Those of you who know me well, know that I am pro-life. This is not a "preserve the life of the baby" type of situation. This is a preserve the life of the mother situation. She was 17 weeks along. She was not going to be able to carry anywhere near term. Let's understand this. The baby was going to die either way....either through waiting or through the abortion procedure.
Instead, the mother's life was at immediate & distinct danger. Of course, in situations such as this, the child's life would have to be sacrified to save that of the mother. This is not an example of "pro-life" decision making.
I'm not against abortion in the case of the mother's life being in jeopardy. Why have both of them die instead of just one? But just to state it, for every one of these types of instances, how many are elective procedures? You don't set rules according to the most rare of instnaces. You set rules based on the majority, and make allowances for the exceptions.
~Jeordam
Instead, the mother's life was at immediate & distinct danger. Of course, in situations such as this, the child's life would have to be sacrified to save that of the mother. This is not an example of "pro-life" decision making.
I'm not against abortion in the case of the mother's life being in jeopardy. Why have both of them die instead of just one? But just to state it, for every one of these types of instances, how many are elective procedures? You don't set rules according to the most rare of instnaces. You set rules based on the majority, and make allowances for the exceptions.
~Jeordam
they specifically told this woman she could not have an abortion because "this is a Catholic country". meaning, their religious doctrine forbids them from performing it under any circumstances. i'm sure when the investigation is done, they will come up with some other reason but from all the reports about this case. from what i've read, there *is* an exception for the life of the mother but for whatever reason, the hospital did not follow this.
also, as the cliche goes there are always exceptions to the rule. it's all fine and dandy to put certain limitations on abortions, but as this case shows, sometimes the exception *does* need to be made. and you can't allow yourself to be overwhelmed by a majority decision when the exception is quite literally a life-and-death situation for everyone involved.
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa
"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
woman dies after doctors deny her a life-saving abortion
- 14/11/2012 06:58:31 PM
1307 Views
this is so terribly sad. keeping abortions legal is important. *NM*
- 14/11/2012 07:09:00 PM
248 Views
Well, I guess to expedite the process of argument and counter-argument, I'll post an article an
- 14/11/2012 07:28:01 PM
578 Views
you're right, i should have posted the actual article instead of an editorial. thanks!
- 14/11/2012 08:14:42 PM
728 Views
so terrible... i will never understand how this crap is considered "pro-life." *NM*
- 15/11/2012 01:15:56 AM
338 Views
Maybe this is more a testament to the quality of care in that hospital than an arguemnt for abortion *NM*
- 15/11/2012 01:49:00 PM
260 Views
Can you elaborate?
- 16/11/2012 04:07:48 PM
500 Views
Do you have access to her medical charts?
- 16/11/2012 08:44:45 PM
507 Views
The infection was from the fetus inside of her. That is not disputed.
- 16/11/2012 10:14:52 PM
462 Views
This wasn't pro-life, but more a case of anti-thinking
- 15/11/2012 06:28:55 PM
529 Views
but the pro-life (or anti-abortion) argument was the reason they gave for not allowing an abortion
- 15/11/2012 10:00:14 PM
609 Views
Once you know for certain that the mother is dying, it is too late.
- 16/11/2012 04:11:25 PM
518 Views
Statistically speaking...
- 15/11/2012 07:03:51 PM
531 Views
Psst.
- 15/11/2012 09:43:35 PM
560 Views
Re: Statistically speaking...
- 15/11/2012 10:56:35 PM
513 Views
Where's the due process?
- 15/11/2012 11:35:39 PM
592 Views
First, prove that the fetus is a "ONE".
- 16/11/2012 04:14:34 PM
469 Views
That argument is specious
- 16/11/2012 08:36:07 PM
483 Views
But you cannot call another living person an "environment." Only for parasites.
- 16/11/2012 10:16:18 PM
450 Views
Yes I can, look up the word environment
- 17/11/2012 11:49:55 AM
583 Views
Win some, lose some
- 15/11/2012 11:29:32 PM
625 Views
Some facts for you - from the article Stephen linked in his reply above, and from general knowledge.
- 16/11/2012 09:38:32 PM
602 Views
That is the most rational argument put forth thus far, HOWEVER
- 17/11/2012 07:06:58 PM
534 Views
Wow.
- 17/11/2012 07:28:23 PM
555 Views
Nah, I don't *try* to insult anyone (most of the time) , though I seem to do so fairly regularly. *NM*
- 18/11/2012 07:41:43 PM
267 Views
Re: That is the most rational argument put forth thus far, HOWEVER
- 17/11/2012 08:07:19 PM
650 Views
Nice decision to turn to insults. Print out your post and let it join your head, up your ass.
- 18/11/2012 07:50:18 PM
549 Views
The difference between Ireland and the UK is about 0.006%
- 17/11/2012 08:31:45 PM
581 Views
It illustrates that the "life of the mother" argument is rare to the point of irrelevance. *NM*
- 18/11/2012 07:45:36 PM
257 Views
And yet this case makes it irrefutably relevant. *NM*
- 20/11/2012 05:18:23 PM
240 Views
No, it really does not. Because the situation is so rare as to not be worth even discussing...
- 21/11/2012 03:24:01 PM
474 Views
In your opinion - in mine, and I suspect others here, it is not.
- 22/11/2012 12:03:20 AM
525 Views
I am not debating opinion, you can't debate opinion, I am trying to point out facts.
- 22/11/2012 05:29:24 PM
460 Views