Active Users:1190 Time:23/11/2024 03:37:05 AM
Larzelere is not the study organizer, though, but someone critical of it. Legolas Send a noteboard - 26/09/2009 07:04:52 PM
My 9-month-old daughter has no idea if she does something that we consider to be "wrong" and she's FAR too young to be yelled at or spanked.

The study organizer said the following:

The best use of spanking, Larzelere said, is in children between the ages of 2 and 6 when milder discipline tactics, such as time out, fail.

In other words, the study basically concluded that (1) you shouldn't immediately spank as a punishment, (2) you should only spank older children who can appreciate the connection between the behavior and the punishment and (3) you don't EVER demean a child verbally - criticize actions and behaviors, not people or their intrinsic qualities.

Either that, or the study got it all wrong - maybe the kids are spanked more BECAUSE they're stupid. :P


The particular study described in the article only worked with very young children, so obviously could not state anything on the topic of spanking older children. The conclusions you state are mostly Larzelere's.
Reply to message
Apparently spanking makes children stupid. - 26/09/2009 12:25:34 PM 1000 Views
Spanking? - 26/09/2009 12:34:41 PM 585 Views
Re: Spanking? - 26/09/2009 12:36:24 PM 630 Views
Negative memories aren't all bad. Parents just need to be consistent, yet loving. *NM* - 26/09/2009 02:06:07 PM 293 Views
Indeed. *NM* - 26/09/2009 02:41:39 PM 286 Views
I dunno.. - 26/09/2009 02:49:50 PM 577 Views
I do believe this study was created to prove the point, not test it. - 26/09/2009 03:25:54 PM 600 Views
What are your grounds for that belief? - 26/09/2009 04:11:37 PM 598 Views
Duke University is one of the best universities in the United States - 26/09/2009 05:11:21 PM 591 Views
Yeah, I have heard of it. - 26/09/2009 05:56:30 PM 563 Views
I agree with her, and here's why - 26/09/2009 06:28:53 PM 563 Views
You are apparently pretty ignorant about psychology if you think it is pseudo-science. - 27/09/2009 01:09:02 AM 546 Views
Bah. It's not falsifiable. - 27/09/2009 01:09:37 PM 640 Views
Karl Popper had a turquoise willy. Falsify THAT with your CERNomatic juiceharp, Galileo. *NM* - 27/09/2009 03:05:44 PM 274 Views
hehe. *NM* - 27/09/2009 04:24:54 PM 282 Views
I would agree... and... - 27/09/2009 01:45:48 AM 517 Views
More likely their comparing two effects and claiming correlation - 27/09/2009 02:32:42 PM 538 Views
Clearly that's why all of our old people are so stupid. - 26/09/2009 04:09:52 PM 573 Views
No, no, that's just nossy bringing down the average. *NM* - 26/09/2009 04:12:10 PM 281 Views
That's not what the study says. It says don't spank VERY young children - 26/09/2009 05:16:33 PM 675 Views
Hahaha *NM* - 26/09/2009 05:58:01 PM 307 Views
Larzelere is not the study organizer, though, but someone critical of it. - 26/09/2009 07:04:52 PM 561 Views
Did I miss something or did I just forget? - 27/09/2009 12:54:13 AM 593 Views
Uh... - 27/09/2009 03:32:03 PM 558 Views
She's a beauty! - 28/09/2009 05:16:36 AM 555 Views
too cute for words! *NM* - 28/09/2009 01:33:29 PM 316 Views
That is also what I got. *NM* - 27/09/2009 12:56:08 AM 283 Views
It isn't brain science... wiat a minute, it actually is... - 27/09/2009 01:18:35 AM 558 Views
Agreed. - 28/09/2009 12:06:29 AM 619 Views
For children that young, I can agree. - 26/09/2009 05:56:41 PM 559 Views
With this too, I agree. ^_^ *NM* - 27/09/2009 01:46:32 AM 256 Views
*rings in* Same. - 04/10/2009 11:55:02 PM 732 Views
Really? - 27/09/2009 01:48:35 AM 614 Views
I must be pretty stupid, then. - 28/09/2009 05:49:26 PM 550 Views
It certainly can make them kinky. *NM* - 28/09/2009 07:19:34 PM 298 Views
It's the old "nature v. nurture" argument again... *NM* - 05/10/2009 06:08:26 PM 225 Views
When the kid has both, it's really screwed over then. *NM* - 05/10/2009 07:48:15 PM 232 Views

Reply to Message