Active Users:541 Time:05/04/2025 03:10:46 PM
Larzelere is not the study organizer, though, but someone critical of it. Legolas Send a noteboard - 26/09/2009 07:04:52 PM
My 9-month-old daughter has no idea if she does something that we consider to be "wrong" and she's FAR too young to be yelled at or spanked.

The study organizer said the following:

The best use of spanking, Larzelere said, is in children between the ages of 2 and 6 when milder discipline tactics, such as time out, fail.

In other words, the study basically concluded that (1) you shouldn't immediately spank as a punishment, (2) you should only spank older children who can appreciate the connection between the behavior and the punishment and (3) you don't EVER demean a child verbally - criticize actions and behaviors, not people or their intrinsic qualities.

Either that, or the study got it all wrong - maybe the kids are spanked more BECAUSE they're stupid. :P


The particular study described in the article only worked with very young children, so obviously could not state anything on the topic of spanking older children. The conclusions you state are mostly Larzelere's.
Reply to message
Apparently spanking makes children stupid. - 26/09/2009 12:25:34 PM 1108 Views
Spanking? - 26/09/2009 12:34:41 PM 642 Views
Re: Spanking? - 26/09/2009 12:36:24 PM 699 Views
Negative memories aren't all bad. Parents just need to be consistent, yet loving. *NM* - 26/09/2009 02:06:07 PM 316 Views
Indeed. *NM* - 26/09/2009 02:41:39 PM 306 Views
I dunno.. - 26/09/2009 02:49:50 PM 646 Views
I do believe this study was created to prove the point, not test it. - 26/09/2009 03:25:54 PM 667 Views
What are your grounds for that belief? - 26/09/2009 04:11:37 PM 669 Views
Duke University is one of the best universities in the United States - 26/09/2009 05:11:21 PM 652 Views
Yeah, I have heard of it. - 26/09/2009 05:56:30 PM 621 Views
I agree with her, and here's why - 26/09/2009 06:28:53 PM 629 Views
You are apparently pretty ignorant about psychology if you think it is pseudo-science. - 27/09/2009 01:09:02 AM 612 Views
Bah. It's not falsifiable. - 27/09/2009 01:09:37 PM 718 Views
Karl Popper had a turquoise willy. Falsify THAT with your CERNomatic juiceharp, Galileo. *NM* - 27/09/2009 03:05:44 PM 298 Views
hehe. *NM* - 27/09/2009 04:24:54 PM 306 Views
I would agree... and... - 27/09/2009 01:45:48 AM 587 Views
More likely their comparing two effects and claiming correlation - 27/09/2009 02:32:42 PM 596 Views
Clearly that's why all of our old people are so stupid. - 26/09/2009 04:09:52 PM 638 Views
No, no, that's just nossy bringing down the average. *NM* - 26/09/2009 04:12:10 PM 312 Views
That's not what the study says. It says don't spank VERY young children - 26/09/2009 05:16:33 PM 746 Views
Hahaha *NM* - 26/09/2009 05:58:01 PM 334 Views
Larzelere is not the study organizer, though, but someone critical of it. - 26/09/2009 07:04:52 PM 629 Views
Did I miss something or did I just forget? - 27/09/2009 12:54:13 AM 659 Views
Uh... - 27/09/2009 03:32:03 PM 624 Views
She's a beauty! - 28/09/2009 05:16:36 AM 621 Views
too cute for words! *NM* - 28/09/2009 01:33:29 PM 341 Views
That is also what I got. *NM* - 27/09/2009 12:56:08 AM 306 Views
It isn't brain science... wiat a minute, it actually is... - 27/09/2009 01:18:35 AM 627 Views
Agreed. - 28/09/2009 12:06:29 AM 687 Views
For children that young, I can agree. - 26/09/2009 05:56:41 PM 630 Views
With this too, I agree. ^_^ *NM* - 27/09/2009 01:46:32 AM 279 Views
*rings in* Same. - 04/10/2009 11:55:02 PM 802 Views
Really? - 27/09/2009 01:48:35 AM 679 Views
I must be pretty stupid, then. - 28/09/2009 05:49:26 PM 613 Views
It certainly can make them kinky. *NM* - 28/09/2009 07:19:34 PM 321 Views
It's the old "nature v. nurture" argument again... *NM* - 05/10/2009 06:08:26 PM 247 Views
When the kid has both, it's really screwed over then. *NM* - 05/10/2009 07:48:15 PM 259 Views

Reply to Message