Active Users:1148 Time:23/11/2024 01:47:41 AM
2 things Night Walker Send a noteboard - 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM
First, NS is always specific in nature, meaning there is always a selection pressure. There has never been a case where natural selection doesn’t involve specific selection. It is intrinsic to NS. Take the guppies experiment without predators. The new selection pressure is now sex. Get rid of sex and the selection pressure might be how fast one can convert nutrients, take that away and there will be something else. There is never a static system (which you seem to imply there is) where specific selection is not on-going.

Second, (I use this phrase loosely) we can not know the mind of nature. To expand on that, it is impossible to know what selection pressure will be greatest each season. We can only evaluate specific traits on a per period basis under certain conditions. We can then use those results to make assumptions on the whole and provide evidence for theories. This is the very nature of science. By your line of reasoning all of science is tautology due to the nature of the universe.
Reply to message
Natural selection - 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM 982 Views
selection for suitability - 06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM 634 Views
Thanks for your responce - 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM 749 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it: - 06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM 679 Views
Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM 682 Views
Yes it can - 06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM 558 Views
But how? - 06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM 752 Views
Okay, I think I see what you're saying - 08/08/2011 05:30:43 PM 568 Views
Close - 08/08/2011 05:41:46 PM 759 Views
Re: Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM 770 Views
I'm not sure I understand you - 06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM 658 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies. - 06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM 684 Views
Then it is still a tautology - 06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM 695 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations. - 06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM 790 Views
Maybe... - 07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM 642 Views
As I understand it - 06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM 624 Views
Better... - 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM 609 Views
Actually - 06/08/2011 10:13:51 PM 689 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 10:37:33 PM 836 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 11:38:52 PM 757 Views
Oeh - 07/08/2011 01:54:19 PM 614 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM 693 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 07:08:25 PM 706 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 07/08/2011 12:46:23 AM 698 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify... - 06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM 731 Views
The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM 727 Views
Re: The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM 702 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question. - 06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM 734 Views
TalkOrigins addresses this at length. - 06/08/2011 11:14:52 PM 779 Views
Not very much, but interesting none the less - 06/08/2011 11:38:36 PM 776 Views
Re: Natural selection - 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM 701 Views
Thanks a lot - 07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM 842 Views
2 things - 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM 621 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM 830 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM 646 Views
My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM 678 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM 618 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM 765 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 07:02:27 PM 614 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 09:09:57 PM 732 Views

Reply to Message