Active Users:407 Time:04/04/2025 06:54:12 AM
2 things Night Walker Send a noteboard - 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM
First, NS is always specific in nature, meaning there is always a selection pressure. There has never been a case where natural selection doesn’t involve specific selection. It is intrinsic to NS. Take the guppies experiment without predators. The new selection pressure is now sex. Get rid of sex and the selection pressure might be how fast one can convert nutrients, take that away and there will be something else. There is never a static system (which you seem to imply there is) where specific selection is not on-going.

Second, (I use this phrase loosely) we can not know the mind of nature. To expand on that, it is impossible to know what selection pressure will be greatest each season. We can only evaluate specific traits on a per period basis under certain conditions. We can then use those results to make assumptions on the whole and provide evidence for theories. This is the very nature of science. By your line of reasoning all of science is tautology due to the nature of the universe.
Reply to message
Natural selection - 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM 1073 Views
selection for suitability - 06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM 719 Views
Thanks for your responce - 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM 836 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it: - 06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM 777 Views
Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM 765 Views
Yes it can - 06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM 638 Views
But how? - 06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM 837 Views
Okay, I think I see what you're saying - 08/08/2011 05:30:43 PM 653 Views
Close - 08/08/2011 05:41:46 PM 852 Views
Re: Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM 858 Views
I'm not sure I understand you - 06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM 763 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies. - 06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM 780 Views
Then it is still a tautology - 06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM 790 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations. - 06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM 892 Views
Maybe... - 07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM 749 Views
As I understand it - 06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM 711 Views
Better... - 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM 694 Views
Actually - 06/08/2011 10:13:51 PM 785 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 10:37:33 PM 923 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 11:38:52 PM 850 Views
Oeh - 07/08/2011 01:54:19 PM 700 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM 797 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 07:08:25 PM 797 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 07/08/2011 12:46:23 AM 791 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify... - 06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM 813 Views
The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM 811 Views
Re: The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM 798 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question. - 06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM 819 Views
TalkOrigins addresses this at length. - 06/08/2011 11:14:52 PM 875 Views
Not very much, but interesting none the less - 06/08/2011 11:38:36 PM 869 Views
Re: Natural selection - 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM 794 Views
Thanks a lot - 07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM 940 Views
2 things - 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM 700 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM 920 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM 732 Views
My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM 763 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM 706 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM 861 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 07:02:27 PM 708 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 09:09:57 PM 818 Views

Reply to Message