If the state doesn't pay for schools, what happens to children whose parents have no money?
Tim Send a noteboard - 06/05/2011 10:25:48 PM
It's true that the article reaches lunatic-land when it starts about how it'd be even better if all schools were private, but up until that paragraph it certainly has good points.
That's the part I'm addressing. I read the tone of the whole analogy as suggesting that (as opposed to it only coming in at the end) – apparently you read it differently.
The thing about choice between schools is complex, and I can see reasons both for and against, so I left that part alone altogether.
Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt.
—Nous disons en allemand : le guerre, le mort, le lune, alors que 'soleil' et 'amour' sont du sexe féminin : la soleil, la amour. La vie est neutre.
—La vie ? Neutre ? C'est très joli, et surtout très logique.
—Nous disons en allemand : le guerre, le mort, le lune, alors que 'soleil' et 'amour' sont du sexe féminin : la soleil, la amour. La vie est neutre.
—La vie ? Neutre ? C'est très joli, et surtout très logique.
If Supermarkets Were Like Public Schools -
06/05/2011 05:05:33 AM
- 974 Views
the obvious solution is to just do away with public education in general
06/05/2011 06:41:58 AM
- 415 Views
If groceries were like education... the analogy would be apt. But they aren't, and it isn't.
06/05/2011 09:40:37 AM
- 586 Views
06/05/2011 01:41:10 PM
- 406 Views
I don't see your point there. The eating of groceries also goes on for many years – all one's life. *NM*
06/05/2011 01:42:38 PM
- 172 Views
Yes, but the effects of not having any are seen within days
06/05/2011 05:29:16 PM
- 396 Views
I see. Yes, that's another reason why it's easy to sit back and do nothing until it's too late.
06/05/2011 06:40:03 PM
- 384 Views
Very narrow-minded - the point is, private is better than public.....
06/05/2011 02:47:39 PM
- 400 Views
so the rest of should be forced to send our kids to bad schools to keep a level playing field? *NM*
06/05/2011 05:24:23 PM
- 166 Views
I have said nothing of the sort, and never would.
06/05/2011 06:31:48 PM
- 414 Views
That is exactly what you said.....and my other reply to you proves.....
06/05/2011 10:05:40 PM
- 413 Views
Fair enough on the second point (almost) – correction duly edited in.
06/05/2011 10:16:39 PM
- 418 Views
That's a rather big non-sequitur there, don't you think?
06/05/2011 06:36:51 PM
- 426 Views
If the state doesn't pay for schools, what happens to children whose parents have no money?
06/05/2011 10:25:48 PM
- 411 Views
More relevantly, what would schools be like if they were run like supermarkets? *NM*
06/05/2011 02:27:49 PM
- 165 Views
Bad schools would close, good ones would get more students - sounds fine to me! *NM*
06/05/2011 02:49:30 PM
- 158 Views
spoken like someone who has no idea what it takes to run a "good school" *NM*
06/05/2011 04:17:12 PM
- 166 Views
Then you have half as many schools. So not much scope for choice any more.
06/05/2011 06:44:26 PM
- 392 Views
most of your arguements are against public education being financed by property taxes *NM*
06/05/2011 02:33:41 PM
- 207 Views
And the forced attendence by where you live instead of giving parents a choice. *NM*
06/05/2011 02:50:23 PM
- 181 Views
Look, I just want a store that carries Crunch n Munch with Almonds.
06/05/2011 09:05:23 PM
- 416 Views
Well if the socialists have their way you won't get Crunch n Munch at all
06/05/2011 11:05:55 PM
- 383 Views