Active Users:1170 Time:23/11/2024 03:33:29 AM
No, I'd blame the shooter first and the mullahs shouting, "JIHAD111" second, as I always do. Joel Send a noteboard - 20/01/2011 03:11:33 AM
Because based on the evidence, a jihadist shooter would have as much a claim to have been influenced by Palin as Loughner has.

Don't you get it? Loughner isn't aligned to Palin's worldview at all, as far as all evidence has been able to establish.

In fact, he is probably closer to Gifford's point of view than Palin's.

Loughner was no more influenced by Palin's "rhetoric" than that guy from the Fort Hood shooting was.

Seriously, we're still doing this? Loughner was more liberal than conservative even though he read Ayn Rand (whose name is born by the new Tea Party Senator from KY), Hitler and Nietzsche (whose heir Hitler claimed, rightly or not, to be) before exercising his Second Amendment rights against one of the most liberal Congressmen in the state that gave us "extremism in the defence of liberty is no vice", all because of his anti-government paranoia. But because he also happened to read Marx he's somehow a liberal despite, lessee... SEVEN examples of conservative beliefs. Does he espouse seven liberal principles? I'll give you hatred of religion, but that's it.

I agree that he's apolitical, but he is closer to the right than the left, and was ripe for all the "Obama's a madrasa trained terrorist born in Kenya, not HI, and must be stopped at any cost to save America" BS constantly spewing from far right demagogues since before he took the Oath of Office. To say Loughner maintained a FB account (much like Palin) and another on MySpace in between buying guns and buying conspiracies but was somehow oblivious to the kind of paranoid militant rhetoric with which he would've been right at home is rather difficult to believe. It hasn't been proven, but stop kidding yourself, man. Again, let's put the safety of our fellow citizens and welfare of our country ahead of partisan loyalty.

Oh, and I happened to be living about 50 miles from Ft. Hood when that shooting occurred, mere months after someone flew a plane into an IRS building 30 miles from me in the other direction, so let's not go there. The former was a right wing fundie who happened to believe the US government at war with the Muslim rather than Christian God, and the other espoused both left and right wing principles but, IMHO, tended to hold more liberal ones. Both believed themselves wrongfully persecuted, but the first has been established to be a religious fanatic and I'm aware of no links between the latter and far left demagoguery (though he's still a liberal guilty of murder in my book, and none of his stated motives justifies that).
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 20/01/2011 at 03:12:22 AM
Reply to message
OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS. - 16/01/2011 12:18:22 PM 1989 Views
Why are they calling it "blood libel"? - 16/01/2011 12:23:47 PM 851 Views
Because if the facts were as they represent them those words would be applicable. - 16/01/2011 12:49:22 PM 1028 Views
It's not entirely clear to me whether you're aware of this or not, but... - 16/01/2011 01:12:22 PM 1074 Views
That's why I said, "popularized". - 16/01/2011 01:46:52 PM 1024 Views
I think Alan Dershowitz dealt with this nonsense already - 16/01/2011 02:34:10 PM 1366 Views
Interesting. I didn't realize it was so wide-spread. - 16/01/2011 03:10:28 PM 925 Views
She wasn't even the first to use the term that week either - 16/01/2011 10:10:35 PM 928 Views
I don't know that "expert" has anything to do with it. - 16/01/2011 10:18:54 PM 956 Views
Re: I don't know that "expert" has anything to do with it. - 16/01/2011 11:30:38 PM 853 Views
Oh please don't you start to - 17/01/2011 02:34:43 PM 808 Views
I for one hadn't noticed it before. - 17/01/2011 10:25:57 PM 979 Views
it was used here and nobody commented - 17/01/2011 10:37:07 PM 868 Views
LOL, I totally forgot that got posted here - 17/01/2011 10:54:26 PM 920 Views
It's funny you should say that... - 18/01/2011 10:32:59 PM 952 Views
Re: It's funny you should say that... - 19/01/2011 03:29:52 PM 937 Views
It was permissible to ignore until it became a rallying cry. - 20/01/2011 04:27:23 PM 961 Views
A rallying cry is hardly illegal - 20/01/2011 05:32:45 PM 1013 Views
I never said it was. - 20/01/2011 06:59:39 PM 1145 Views
Oh, I noticed that one alright. - 18/01/2011 10:25:23 PM 792 Views
compared to the way similar terms are used? - 19/01/2011 06:58:02 PM 937 Views
I meant I hadn't seen it used in different contexts before. - 19/01/2011 07:35:00 PM 918 Views
Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him. - 16/01/2011 10:24:09 PM 1005 Views
Re: Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him. - 16/01/2011 11:09:21 PM 1035 Views
Again, Giffords specifically made the connection between Palins imagery and an attack on her. - 17/01/2011 12:53:08 AM 1172 Views
That means precisely nothing - 17/01/2011 03:59:07 PM 870 Views
It means everything. - 18/01/2011 08:34:55 PM 1139 Views
I'm trying to understand your logic - 19/01/2011 12:50:28 AM 744 Views
There are two points: - 19/01/2011 02:47:48 AM 932 Views
Re: It means everything. - 19/01/2011 05:55:02 PM 771 Views
That's simply illogical. - 20/01/2011 01:08:51 AM 1148 Views
the old step one steal underwear step three profit argument - 19/01/2011 06:01:14 PM 1025 Views
that is some twisted and bizarre logic - 17/01/2011 02:38:41 PM 969 Views
So I am a little confused on something... - 16/01/2011 02:38:59 PM 1026 Views
Palin putting Giffords district in the crosshairs and Giffords implying at the time she feared this - 16/01/2011 11:21:36 PM 1162 Views
If I understand what you are saying correctly... - 17/01/2011 07:07:56 AM 899 Views
I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand. - 17/01/2011 08:33:47 AM 908 Views
Re: I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand. - 17/01/2011 04:24:01 PM 961 Views
The Secret Service does guard Congressmen, just not all of them automatically. - 18/01/2011 09:13:39 PM 796 Views
No, they don't - 18/01/2011 10:19:34 PM 984 Views
Really? Cannoli says differently, and I believe he's right on that one. - 18/01/2011 10:50:51 PM 1064 Views
You seem to be reading what you want to from what I said - 19/01/2011 01:27:32 PM 913 Views
I read what you said & understood it as you restate here, hence I referenced local police (twice) - 20/01/2011 02:15:17 AM 949 Views
The problem here is your ignoring normal policing powers to concoct an absurdity - 20/01/2011 04:20:25 PM 997 Views
More absurd than the notion such incitement warrants no notice? - 20/01/2011 05:42:47 PM 1059 Views
Your shifting your original premise, *again* - 20/01/2011 08:24:18 PM 883 Views
No, you're simply missing the point of it. - 20/01/2011 11:09:57 PM 881 Views
There is no point - 21/01/2011 12:22:30 AM 928 Views
If I had no point I wouldn't bother, but fair enough. - 21/01/2011 01:20:32 AM 1177 Views
Uh...Last I checked conservatives didn't list the Communist Manifesto as a favourite book. - 16/01/2011 03:05:07 PM 1199 Views
You're awesome at missing points, aren't you? - 16/01/2011 07:26:30 PM 942 Views
where is the accountability for those committing slander? - 17/01/2011 02:52:40 PM 852 Views
Libs hate Mein Kampf and We the Living; conservatives hate the Communist Manifesto: He's neither. - 16/01/2011 10:06:02 PM 899 Views
conseartives hate Mein Kampf and liberals stil read the Communist Manifesto - 17/01/2011 02:57:22 PM 877 Views
That first line is says it all. - 18/01/2011 09:34:06 PM 960 Views
Nazis had more in common with communist then capitalist - 19/01/2011 04:10:09 PM 1067 Views
The founder of fascism called it "the merger of corporate and national power". - 20/01/2011 02:51:09 AM 950 Views
and that is supposed to mean something? - 20/01/2011 06:06:18 PM 989 Views
YOU are cherry picking. - 20/01/2011 07:50:21 PM 895 Views
It is to be expected that this site would be libtard central... - 16/01/2011 05:23:53 PM 1155 Views
See my reply to Dragonsoul above. - 16/01/2011 07:30:40 PM 1003 Views
Yeah, your first was better - 16/01/2011 09:48:58 PM 815 Views
Again, I don't think Palin intended this, but Giffords feared ten months ago that this could result. - 16/01/2011 11:29:19 PM 960 Views
And I call bullshit - 18/01/2011 03:12:13 PM 1100 Views
If Palin wants to accuse Giffords of libel she should have the guts to do it to her face. - 18/01/2011 10:39:07 PM 1057 Views
So if some jihadist shot Gifford, would you also blame Palin? - 19/01/2011 02:52:42 PM 943 Views
No, I'd blame the shooter first and the mullahs shouting, "JIHAD111" second, as I always do. - 20/01/2011 03:11:33 AM 1039 Views
Palin didn't really have anything to do with this, but it makes sense she's blamed. - 16/01/2011 10:19:51 PM 878 Views
Pretty much. - 16/01/2011 11:44:35 PM 962 Views
Did they ever catch the person(s) that vandalized Gifford's office? *NM* - 17/01/2011 03:30:36 AM 448 Views
politcal offices are vandalized on a regular basis *NM* - 17/01/2011 02:41:29 PM 408 Views
She only asked if they caught the guy, she didn't accuse anyone, Sarah. - 18/01/2011 11:27:18 PM 845 Views
OK Olberman when did I imply otherwise? *NM* - 19/01/2011 02:48:41 PM 459 Views
"Political offices are vandalized on a regular basis". - 20/01/2011 03:16:39 AM 1039 Views
Took you this long, huh? - 17/01/2011 01:53:31 PM 798 Views
I am sick of the desperate attempts of liberals to find a way to use a tragedy - 17/01/2011 02:31:18 PM 813 Views
I'm just curious. - 17/01/2011 03:23:47 PM 789 Views
Re: I'm just curious. - 17/01/2011 03:28:04 PM 932 Views
I always said I'd do that after Bush was re-elected. - 18/01/2011 11:52:45 PM 813 Views
like I said a matter of faith - 17/01/2011 04:27:51 PM 804 Views
I find it interesting... - 17/01/2011 05:31:54 PM 952 Views
I mention her looks solely because... - 20/01/2011 02:30:42 PM 822 Views
If slander, not mine, Giffords' (at least you don't err like Palin and say, "libel" ). - 18/01/2011 11:14:23 PM 1007 Views
mark you calendar today is the day Joel offically went around the bend into insanity - 19/01/2011 05:28:06 PM 813 Views
A mirror will show me who's to blame? On whom have I put a crosshairs? - 20/01/2011 03:23:43 AM 867 Views
so it is all a matter of faith for you - 20/01/2011 05:48:44 AM 817 Views
No, it's fairly straight forward logic. - 20/01/2011 03:25:56 PM 922 Views
sorry Joel but you haven't - 20/01/2011 03:29:49 PM 727 Views
It's there; in this thread alone people from both sides of the aisle have acknowledged that. - 20/01/2011 05:51:21 PM 820 Views
only in your does the connection exisit - 20/01/2011 06:39:35 PM 853 Views
No. - 20/01/2011 07:35:09 PM 932 Views
dude wake up - 20/01/2011 08:54:33 PM 1074 Views
So in your opinion... - 17/01/2011 05:27:58 PM 803 Views
How 'bout simply color coding them? - 18/01/2011 11:21:03 PM 851 Views
Why not just blame Giffords? - 17/01/2011 06:07:14 PM 1149 Views
Indeed, why not; Sarah Palin does. - 18/01/2011 06:58:01 PM 968 Views
The irony of this thread is not lost on me. - 19/01/2011 04:09:01 PM 991 Views
Exactly. *NM* - 19/01/2011 04:51:40 PM 497 Views
Bizarre thread for that Soapbox - 19/01/2011 05:17:58 PM 740 Views
You missed the point, obviously. - 19/01/2011 06:04:23 PM 848 Views
so you are saying it is the same old RAFO - 19/01/2011 06:47:24 PM 907 Views
The thread has admittedly degenerated - 19/01/2011 07:02:12 PM 766 Views
Check your NB. Noted you a response. *NM* - 19/01/2011 07:04:58 PM 478 Views
That I knew it would go this way is why I avoided looking closely for so long. - 19/01/2011 11:20:44 PM 996 Views
Hey, now. I have to step in. - 20/01/2011 04:44:49 PM 1018 Views
I'm just saying a significant link can be demonstrated. - 20/01/2011 07:07:27 PM 1072 Views
Re: OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS. - 22/01/2011 05:49:44 PM 1004 Views

Reply to Message