Are you telling me monitors are THAT horribly inefficient?
Joel Send a noteboard - 22/11/2010 02:55:43 PM
Remember, a search spider cannot tell whether a site has a language filter or not unless it sees swear words, and it's not like we get thee in every other post anyway. I think it's much more likely this site would be added to blacklists because someone would notice people spending a lot of time here.
Since you categorically state that we stand the risk of beng blacklisted, it'd be nice to see some data to back this claim up. Installing a few different parental control suites and trying to access the site should be enough.
Since you categorically state that we stand the risk of beng blacklisted, it'd be nice to see some data to back this claim up. Installing a few different parental control suites and trying to access the site should be enough.
Makes sense; why take five seconds to check whether any kind of language filter has been coded and/or scan the CoC (oh, right, we don't have one yet; never mind...

Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 22/11/2010 at 02:57:30 PM
Can we swear at RAFO?
22/11/2010 04:57:59 AM
- 1026 Views
Fuck no. Are you shitting me? There's no damn chance we can swear.
22/11/2010 05:01:48 AM
- 645 Views
You DARE presume to assault my delicate ears with your nasty coarse sailor talk???
22/11/2010 05:05:23 AM
- 676 Views
I can't think of underage users
22/11/2010 11:32:40 AM
- 732 Views
Well
22/11/2010 11:47:13 AM
- 730 Views
That's a good point of course
22/11/2010 11:58:37 AM
- 649 Views
Obviously we don't know what we don't know.</Rumsfeld>
22/11/2010 12:33:53 PM
- 756 Views
Apparently it's not high on Ben's priority list, so we seem to be fine for now. *NM*
22/11/2010 12:38:42 PM
- 336 Views
The difference is webbrowsers can't be set to automatically exlude the former from web searches.
22/11/2010 12:01:05 PM
- 717 Views
How many posts have there been with swear words in titles?
22/11/2010 12:45:49 PM
- 568 Views
Are you telling me monitors are THAT horribly inefficient?
22/11/2010 02:55:43 PM
- 724 Views
Scanning a CoC requires a human (or significantly improved parsing), whereas spidering can be dumb
22/11/2010 03:06:19 PM
- 650 Views
I figured,but checking for filter subroutines seems like it would be pretty easy.
22/11/2010 04:18:01 PM
- 759 Views
Subroutines such as what?
22/11/2010 04:33:05 PM
- 975 Views
Well, honestly, I don't know, but I expect language filter subroutines are pretty standardized now.
22/11/2010 08:01:07 PM
- 955 Views
The point is that there is nothing that a browser* will see of such a filter unless...
23/11/2010 08:56:37 AM
- 630 Views
OK, but even then preventing such posts covers the contingencies while censoring none.
23/11/2010 01:49:15 PM
- 675 Views
well...
23/11/2010 04:14:51 PM
- 684 Views
Re: well...
23/11/2010 05:26:14 PM
- 660 Views
Re: well...
23/11/2010 06:42:43 PM
- 635 Views
Yes, a lot of people don't seem to want RAFO "invaded" by new people.
23/11/2010 07:03:14 PM
- 709 Views
new people is not the same as children.
*NM*
23/11/2010 08:30:43 PM
- 330 Views

True, but the same principles apply to people surfing at work or college.
23/11/2010 09:16:30 PM
- 668 Views
Please.
23/11/2010 09:40:16 PM
- 680 Views
Of course they do; who do you think creates all those time sink--er, games?
23/11/2010 11:46:09 PM
- 641 Views

I resent that.
23/11/2010 10:09:36 PM
- 556 Views

Yeah, I may have skipped a few important people, too; sorry.
23/11/2010 11:44:12 PM
- 739 Views

the whole community was younger then. It really doesn't apply to today.
24/11/2010 07:50:56 AM
- 625 Views
Unless you mean the whole internet community, it's far more applicable, but to different individuals
24/11/2010 02:26:01 PM
- 716 Views
188 f-bombs dropped in titles, $hit's used 142 times in titles
22/11/2010 05:01:02 PM
- 655 Views
Fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck
22/11/2010 06:27:59 PM
- 642 Views
Yea, you're helping exclude dozens, if not hundreds of potential RAFOlk.
22/11/2010 07:42:58 PM
- 799 Views

Watch out. The CIA is watching you post that. And then they're going to arrest EVERYONE.
22/11/2010 08:09:07 PM
- 683 Views
I used the search function, it was just the number of post that had those in their title
22/11/2010 07:45:18 PM
- 615 Views
*waves* Hi! *NM*
22/11/2010 10:17:52 PM
- 345 Views
Hey there!
22/11/2010 10:30:24 PM
- 832 Views
A great deal of us were underage, though.
23/11/2010 01:11:58 AM
- 725 Views
And look what a dirty mouth you got even without our help
*NM*
23/11/2010 08:04:06 AM
- 321 Views

All I can say to that is that people who think cursing on RAFO/WoTmania corrupts the youth
23/11/2010 10:13:26 PM
- 617 Views
Who cares about the cursing. In other ways wotmania did probably corrupt me, though.
23/11/2010 10:25:37 PM
- 656 Views
