Active Users:495 Time:01/11/2024 09:53:45 AM
On a gut level, I think all substance is teleologically tied to one or more kinds of consciousness. Burr Send a noteboard - 14/09/2009 04:03:31 PM
I infer that there are substances that I will never observe but some other conscious being has or will. And I imagine that God observes all, but maybe even he enjoys the occasional emergent surprise. If any of that fits with what you mean by "spiritual substance," then yes.

But not in any animist sense. I don't believe that souls exist as a special substance, for instance. I am just one of many examples of awesome physical programming.
||||||||||*MySmiley*
Only so evil.
Reply to message
Do you think there's some kind of spiritual substance in the universe? - 14/09/2009 02:42:22 PM 813 Views
no, it is mostly hydrogen *NM* - 14/09/2009 02:43:47 PM 245 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 03:01:32 PM 222 Views
not a chance *NM* - 14/09/2009 03:23:02 PM 230 Views
yes (in as much that we could choose to define it that way) - 14/09/2009 03:31:40 PM 608 Views
On a gut level, I think all substance is teleologically tied to one or more kinds of consciousness. - 14/09/2009 04:03:31 PM 551 Views
aaah but who says we can percieve all there is to percieve in relation to our persons? - 14/09/2009 04:14:08 PM 509 Views
But merely positing a soul (as a spiritual substance) doesn't actually explain anything. - 14/09/2009 07:46:35 PM 487 Views
i'm not saying that all inexplained qualities are due to "soul" - 14/09/2009 07:50:27 PM 545 Views
Re: i'm not saying that all inexplained qualities are due to "soul" - 14/09/2009 08:05:41 PM 544 Views
Carts and horses. - 18/09/2009 12:10:22 PM 678 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 05:14:33 PM 225 Views
Wouldn't spiritual and substance be mutually exclusive? - 14/09/2009 05:27:09 PM 544 Views
Re: Wouldn't spiritual and substance be mutually exclusive? - 14/09/2009 06:20:45 PM 522 Views
I think there is definitely a spiritual force that underlies the unity of all things - 14/09/2009 06:11:01 PM 559 Views
That sounds very like gnosticism in many ways. - 18/09/2009 12:17:51 PM 565 Views
No. *NM* - 14/09/2009 07:06:59 PM 219 Views
define "spiritual'. - 14/09/2009 07:36:18 PM 494 Views
Rum. - 14/09/2009 08:25:46 PM 548 Views
YES! *NM* - 16/09/2009 02:10:55 PM 253 Views
How are we not married? *NM* - 19/09/2009 04:10:13 AM 227 Views
Bigamy laws. *NM* - 19/09/2009 03:49:59 PM 209 Views
My Achilles heel! *NM* - 19/09/2009 07:30:06 PM 231 Views
Timing *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:51:37 PM 220 Views
My Achilles ankle! *NM* - 21/09/2009 08:14:42 PM 239 Views
Your Face. *NM* - 21/09/2009 08:21:44 PM 220 Views
My Achilles face! - 07/10/2009 09:40:36 PM 445 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 09:09:16 PM 212 Views
No *NM* - 14/09/2009 09:31:14 PM 225 Views
Yes, vodka. *NM* - 14/09/2009 10:02:19 PM 210 Views
Substance? - 14/09/2009 10:08:04 PM 507 Views
Yeah, boobs. - 15/09/2009 01:51:44 AM 492 Views
Not the way I'd put it, as jh notes, but unquestionably. - 15/09/2009 03:17:22 PM 535 Views
Look, don't put words in my mouth. - 15/09/2009 04:50:13 PM 564 Views
Sorry. - 15/09/2009 05:14:10 PM 493 Views
Re: Sorry. - 17/09/2009 09:20:58 PM 465 Views
People over-complicate this, it's a sort of animal abuse - 15/09/2009 09:03:01 PM 525 Views
Nicely put. *NM* - 17/09/2009 01:57:44 AM 205 Views
Very nicely put. *NM* - 17/09/2009 06:57:57 PM 208 Views
A sublte nuance most modern materialists miss. - 18/09/2009 12:21:33 PM 743 Views
I think there may be platonic forms defining purpose - 16/09/2009 06:27:36 AM 482 Views
The material universe precludes a purely natural cause. - 18/09/2009 12:04:16 PM 615 Views
One little correction - 20/09/2009 12:34:13 AM 625 Views
Nay. - 20/09/2009 07:04:47 AM 481 Views
Re: Nay. - 07/10/2009 11:55:28 AM 537 Views

Reply to Message