Oh i know it's not a complete solution and i have no problem with a fence
LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 16/08/2010 07:43:26 PM
but so many people just focus on the border itself and worry about building a big enough/good enough fence and patrolling it constantly in its entirety. So few people focus on the bigger issues in regards to illegal immigration that can proactively decrease it, such as process reform and drug reform.
Just for some rough numbers, I have a friend (a wotmaniac-friend) who's husband is from Australia. Our good old friend Australia, yes? To come to the States, he had to wait a full year and pay thousands of dollars. He yearly has to pay a good chunk of money (I believe it's around 1k dollars) to stay on his particular visa/green card. This is exacerbated a bit, as they are not pursuing citizenship (When she finishes school, they plan to move back to Aus).
My main point in this is that it requires a great deal of time and money to come to the US legally, even for someone from a country like Australia, and who is working in a relatively desired field (he's a techie). Is it really a surprise that impoverished Mexicans without a hope in their own country look at the finances and time required for proper immigration, and choose to chance a border jump instead? This isn't to say we should just let them all in or not remove them, but people in desperate circumstances will find away around a fence. An entire shark-infested sea doesn't stop the Cubans.
Just for some rough numbers, I have a friend (a wotmaniac-friend) who's husband is from Australia. Our good old friend Australia, yes? To come to the States, he had to wait a full year and pay thousands of dollars. He yearly has to pay a good chunk of money (I believe it's around 1k dollars) to stay on his particular visa/green card. This is exacerbated a bit, as they are not pursuing citizenship (When she finishes school, they plan to move back to Aus).
My main point in this is that it requires a great deal of time and money to come to the US legally, even for someone from a country like Australia, and who is working in a relatively desired field (he's a techie). Is it really a surprise that impoverished Mexicans without a hope in their own country look at the finances and time required for proper immigration, and choose to chance a border jump instead? This isn't to say we should just let them all in or not remove them, but people in desperate circumstances will find away around a fence. An entire shark-infested sea doesn't stop the Cubans.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
At what point does it become ok to take over a country?
16/08/2010 04:25:09 PM
- 1230 Views
why would we want to make Mexico our problem? *NM*
16/08/2010 04:30:48 PM
- 330 Views
Yeah that's why i don't want us to take over. I think the US is already too big as is *NM*
16/08/2010 04:37:41 PM
- 303 Views
One might argue it already is. The other way around too, though. *NM*
16/08/2010 04:44:19 PM
- 289 Views
I'm fairly sure that yes, the majority of them have national pride.
16/08/2010 04:51:38 PM
- 774 Views
Re: I'm fairly sure that yes, the majority of them have national pride.
16/08/2010 05:11:49 PM
- 637 Views
Actually, make that number 120 to 150. *NM*
16/08/2010 05:14:15 PM
- 301 Views
We don't invade countries we can't locate on the map...
16/08/2010 06:01:43 PM
- 849 Views
So that means there are only five or so countries you can invade, one of them yourself?
16/08/2010 06:11:43 PM
- 594 Views
Re: So that means there are only five or so countries you can invade, one of them yourself?
16/08/2010 06:30:56 PM
- 819 Views
When they get on your nerves or have something you want, preferably both
16/08/2010 05:04:10 PM
- 763 Views
I agree we should attack Canada instead
16/08/2010 05:19:48 PM
- 757 Views
Yeah, but they don't gouge us for the oil, cost the same as anyone else *NM*
16/08/2010 05:49:38 PM
- 311 Views
I would legalize drugs ten times over before I would annex Mexico.
16/08/2010 05:36:37 PM
- 831 Views
"I would stop doing a bad thing 10 times over before I did a worse thing"? WTF? *NM*
16/08/2010 06:04:48 PM
- 384 Views
Read the original post. He proposes annexing Mexico due to the drug problem.
16/08/2010 06:28:54 PM
- 799 Views
He's just nitpicking on your phrasing in the subject line. I think. *NM*
16/08/2010 06:37:17 PM
- 293 Views
that sounds like a much better immigration solution idea than "let's build a GIGANTIC FENCE!!!" *NM*
16/08/2010 06:33:46 PM
- 313 Views
Work Visas might help, but...
16/08/2010 06:51:11 PM
- 949 Views
Oh i know it's not a complete solution and i have no problem with a fence
16/08/2010 07:43:26 PM
- 695 Views
Just so long as we're both on the 'multi-front solution' page
16/08/2010 08:35:06 PM
- 610 Views
it's also worth noting that no one is proposing throwing out the Cubans
16/08/2010 08:54:46 PM
- 758 Views
When the US says so. We are the bosses of the World, are we not? *NM*
16/08/2010 08:06:08 PM
- 311 Views
Not even Hitler's Germany? (if he never went to war but just stayed put) Reply to Yuna *NM*
16/08/2010 09:24:41 PM
- 401 Views
If he had never gone to war, that would also have meant no Holocaust... *NM*
16/08/2010 09:28:16 PM
- 304 Views
Really? Why is that? I'm not too terribly familiar with Hitler's reasons for mass genocide *NM*
16/08/2010 09:30:48 PM
- 307 Views
Dachau opened in '33, Nuremburg Laws were '35
16/08/2010 09:36:59 PM
- 689 Views
Ok that's what I was thinking
16/08/2010 09:45:51 PM
- 697 Views
Uh, yeah, see, there's a difference between "blaming" and "exterminating".
16/08/2010 09:52:37 PM
- 733 Views
Re: Uh, yeah, see, there's a difference between "blaming" and "exterminating".
16/08/2010 09:54:29 PM
- 662 Views
I don't know if there's really anything to specifically compare it to...
16/08/2010 10:00:59 PM
- 832 Views
Also, perhaps someone should just invoke the (variation of the) Godwin Law and stop this whole thing
16/08/2010 10:02:23 PM
- 738 Views
Ah,
16/08/2010 10:04:39 PM
- 645 Views
Nah, more like, I know I shouldn't have done this, but I couldn't resist. *NM*
16/08/2010 10:07:35 PM
- 326 Views
Well, you'll note I didn't make that causal relation you attribute to me.
16/08/2010 09:55:39 PM
- 773 Views
The Dachau follow up was bookkeeping
16/08/2010 10:05:35 PM
- 723 Views
I'm confused, but I'll take that as something I don't have to argue.
16/08/2010 10:09:16 PM
- 784 Views
Re: I'm confused, but I'll take that as something I don't have to argue.
16/08/2010 10:19:19 PM
- 700 Views
The US already took half of Mexico, so why not the other half?
16/08/2010 09:57:56 PM
- 771 Views
"Took" is an unfriendly word, we purchased it *NM*
16/08/2010 10:21:58 PM
- 311 Views
yes after a messy political and physical "conflict"
16/08/2010 10:53:22 PM
- 744 Views
There was also the Gasdsen Purchase
17/08/2010 12:30:21 AM
- 686 Views
The Gadsden Purchase was a pittance and an afterthought, as I'm sure you're aware.
18/08/2010 12:36:24 PM
- 606 Views
and why did it belong to Mexico to begin with? *NM*
17/08/2010 01:28:28 AM
- 343 Views
same way it seems to be the way most people who own the Americas came to own it.
17/08/2010 01:46:49 AM
- 563 Views
my best friend is an illegal and is going back to mexico in a few months
16/08/2010 11:28:11 PM
- 737 Views
every issue is simpler when you don't have faces to represent it for you. *NM*
16/08/2010 11:29:38 PM
- 313 Views
We should seal our border and peform drone strikes on cartels.
17/08/2010 12:58:37 AM
- 584 Views
Re: We should seal our border and peform drone strikes on cartels.
17/08/2010 02:39:11 AM
- 654 Views
Re: We should seal our border and peform drone strikes on cartels.
17/08/2010 03:34:59 AM
- 817 Views
I think maybe we've had enough of nation building for a while *NM*
17/08/2010 02:45:22 AM
- 293 Views